Sineed
rabble-rouser-machine
Member: 12260
Joined: Dec 4 2005

Me too, Boom Boom (nice to see you, BTW.  Now is about the time we'd get a gardening thread going about our fall harvests, but it won't be me as the crap weather in Toronto this summer has meant my garden is a total washout).

At the risk of being a bit drifty: I think Stockholm got to the heart of it in this post:

Quote:
I suspect that there are actually a very large number of people who vote NDP in places like Sackville-Eastern Shore, north Winnipeg, Northern Ontario, Windsor, hamilton, Churchill and various suburban BC ridings like in Surrey - who are not all that big on drug legalization and who may not be all that big on cannabis legalization either and if the NDP were depicted as a party that was being infiltrated by former Marijuana Party activists etc... it would make the party look whacky and fringe and not to be taken seriously.

I'm not arguing against decriminalization of marijuana. That is already NDP policy and i agree with it. But I think you are kidding yourself if you think that there is no political price to be paid anywhere in canada for being viewed as the "pro-drug party".

The NDP wants more seats, so they're going to try and discreetly shed their fringier elements.  The Liberals would have handled this better, IMO; they've far more experience with being hypocritical sellouts.  

But take SS marriage, for instance.  The NDP adopted a principled stance, and we all applauded them for it, but there are people in the NDP who believe that supporting the most activist extremist position on that issue cost them seats.  And they don't want to lose more seats over another "fringe" issue.


Investigation into treatment of Dana Larson and the marijuana resolution needed By: Darwin OConnor (114 replies) August 27, 2009 - 12:05pm
  • The issue here is not BC or By: MUN Prof. (Aug 28 2009 - 2:42pm)
  • remind wrote: If heroin By: Sineed (Aug 28 2009 - 2:39pm)
  • melovesproles wrote: I wish By: Slumberjack (Aug 28 2009 - 2:30pm)
  • Quote:Yes, as we have seen, By: melovesproles (Aug 28 2009 - 2:26pm)
  • But Mexico is also building By: pcml (Aug 28 2009 - 2:24pm)
  • Mexico apparently did an By: Snert (Aug 28 2009 - 2:00pm)
  • Dana, I agree that it is a By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 1:55pm)
  • edit just not worth the By: Bookish Agrarian (Aug 28 2009 - 1:49pm)
  • Quote: Larsen and his gang By: Dana Larsen (Aug 28 2009 - 1:40pm)
  • ... it is obvious the NDP By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 1:34pm)
  • Sineed wrote: And crack By: ocsi (Aug 28 2009 - 1:17pm)
  • MUN Prof. wrote: Yes, as we By: Sineed (Aug 28 2009 - 1:12pm)
  • To clarify, I never said By: ottawaobserver (Aug 28 2009 - 12:45pm)
  • Yes, as we have seen, single By: MUN Prof. (Aug 28 2009 - 12:40pm)
  • I have not been here for a By: pcml (Aug 28 2009 - 12:07pm)
  • Stockholm wrote: And the By: Darwin OConnor (Aug 28 2009 - 11:50am)
  • Regulation and strict By: ocsi (Aug 28 2009 - 11:48am)
  • Stockholm wrote: Darwin By: mahara (Aug 28 2009 - 11:42am)
  • Stockholm wrote:   As has By: ocsi (Aug 28 2009 - 11:39am)
  • Maybe they weren't being By: Stockholm (Aug 28 2009 - 9:51am)
  • How could they have given By: Darwin OConnor (Aug 28 2009 - 9:36am)
  • Darwin OConnor wrote: SSM By: Stockholm (Aug 28 2009 - 9:36am)
  • Darwin OConnor wrote: Even By: Sineed (Aug 28 2009 - 9:27am)
  • SSM was unpopular in Canada By: Darwin OConnor (Aug 28 2009 - 9:11am)
  • Actually, I've never met By: Stockholm (Aug 28 2009 - 9:00am)
  • Me too, Boom Boom (nice to By: Sineed (Aug 28 2009 - 8:47am)
  • I agree Dana was treated By: Boom Boom (Aug 27 2009 - 5:43pm)
  • ...just like in the BC By: Stockholm (Aug 27 2009 - 5:38pm)
  • I think the Green party is By: melovesproles (Aug 27 2009 - 5:31pm)
  • Daniel, I'd like to see what By: Stockholm (Aug 27 2009 - 4:33pm)
  • MUN Prof. wrote: How about a By: kropotkin1951 (Aug 27 2009 - 4:23pm)
  • How about a Royal By: MUN Prof. (Aug 27 2009 - 1:58pm)
  • There was no filibuster, By: sandpiper (Aug 27 2009 - 1:56pm)
  • I highly doubt there was By: madmax (Aug 27 2009 - 1:51pm)
  • You may want to add to it By: Daniel Grice (Aug 27 2009 - 12:10pm)