remind
\,,/ rabble-rouser-l33t \,,/
Member: 7289
Joined: Jun 25 2004

Stockholm wrote:
I will bet my life savings that when the NDP wins a majority government, marijuana will be decriminalized. I can also promise that if there is a Liberal minority government that introduces legislation to decriminalize possession of small amounts of marijuana - the NDP and the BQ will vote in favour of it.

I think that's enough.

Really?

Good thing you speak only for yourself. Great MP's like Libby Davis  and Bill Siksay certainly don't think it is enough.

Moreover, quite the cute slight of hand in your sentence that I bolded, "if" the minority Liberal government introduces it, eh? Not the NDP spear heading it though.

And if the NDP win a majority government, not "when", you think they would do so, eh. No wonder your life savings are so easily bet away.

If this is representative of the "new" thinking in the NDP upper echelons, I must say they have smarmy platitudes down to a fine art.

ALL drug addictions have to be moved into the realm of health care and out of the criminal code jurisdiction.

This isn't really even about the decriminalization of pot, it is about social justice on an  societal scale, and democracy in the party politic body.


Investigation into treatment of Dana Larson and the marijuana resolution needed By: Darwin OConnor (114 replies) August 27, 2009 - 12:05pm
  • The issue here is not BC or By: MUN Prof. (Aug 28 2009 - 2:42pm)
  • remind wrote: If heroin By: Sineed (Aug 28 2009 - 2:39pm)
  • melovesproles wrote: I wish By: Slumberjack (Aug 28 2009 - 2:30pm)
  • Quote:Yes, as we have seen, By: melovesproles (Aug 28 2009 - 2:26pm)
  • But Mexico is also building By: pcml (Aug 28 2009 - 2:24pm)
  • Mexico apparently did an By: Snert (Aug 28 2009 - 2:00pm)
  • Dana, I agree that it is a By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 1:55pm)
  • edit just not worth the By: Bookish Agrarian (Aug 28 2009 - 1:49pm)
  • Quote: Larsen and his gang By: Dana Larsen (Aug 28 2009 - 1:40pm)
  • ... it is obvious the NDP By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 1:34pm)
  • Sineed wrote: And crack By: ocsi (Aug 28 2009 - 1:17pm)
  • MUN Prof. wrote: Yes, as we By: Sineed (Aug 28 2009 - 1:12pm)
  • To clarify, I never said By: ottawaobserver (Aug 28 2009 - 12:45pm)
  • Yes, as we have seen, single By: MUN Prof. (Aug 28 2009 - 12:40pm)
  • I have not been here for a By: pcml (Aug 28 2009 - 12:07pm)
  • Stockholm wrote: And the By: Darwin OConnor (Aug 28 2009 - 11:50am)
  • Regulation and strict By: ocsi (Aug 28 2009 - 11:48am)
  • Stockholm wrote: Darwin By: mahara (Aug 28 2009 - 11:42am)
  • Stockholm wrote:   As has By: ocsi (Aug 28 2009 - 11:39am)
  • Maybe they weren't being By: Stockholm (Aug 28 2009 - 9:51am)
  • How could they have given By: Darwin OConnor (Aug 28 2009 - 9:36am)
  • Darwin OConnor wrote: SSM By: Stockholm (Aug 28 2009 - 9:36am)
  • Darwin OConnor wrote: Even By: Sineed (Aug 28 2009 - 9:27am)
  • SSM was unpopular in Canada By: Darwin OConnor (Aug 28 2009 - 9:11am)
  • Actually, I've never met By: Stockholm (Aug 28 2009 - 9:00am)
  • Me too, Boom Boom (nice to By: Sineed (Aug 28 2009 - 8:47am)
  • I agree Dana was treated By: Boom Boom (Aug 27 2009 - 5:43pm)
  • ...just like in the BC By: Stockholm (Aug 27 2009 - 5:38pm)
  • I think the Green party is By: melovesproles (Aug 27 2009 - 5:31pm)
  • Daniel, I'd like to see what By: Stockholm (Aug 27 2009 - 4:33pm)
  • MUN Prof. wrote: How about a By: kropotkin1951 (Aug 27 2009 - 4:23pm)
  • How about a Royal By: MUN Prof. (Aug 27 2009 - 1:58pm)
  • There was no filibuster, By: sandpiper (Aug 27 2009 - 1:56pm)
  • I highly doubt there was By: madmax (Aug 27 2009 - 1:51pm)
  • You may want to add to it By: Daniel Grice (Aug 27 2009 - 12:10pm)