Investigation into treatment of Dana Larson and the marijuana resolution needed By: Darwin OConnor (114 replies) August 27, 2009 - 1:05pmThe issue here is not BC or By: MUN Prof. (Aug 28 2009 - 3:42pm) remind wrote:
If heroin By: Sineed (Aug 28 2009 - 3:39pm) melovesproles wrote: I wish By: Slumberjack (Aug 28 2009 - 3:30pm) Quote:Yes, as we have seen, By: melovesproles (Aug 28 2009 - 3:26pm) But Mexico is also building By: pcml (Aug 28 2009 - 3:24pm) Mexico apparently did an By: Snert (Aug 28 2009 - 3:00pm) Dana, I agree that it is a By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 2:55pm) edit
just not worth the By: Bookish Agrarian (Aug 28 2009 - 2:49pm) Quote: Larsen and his gang By: Dana Larsen (Aug 28 2009 - 2:40pm) ... it is obvious the NDP By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 2:34pm) Sineed wrote:
And crack By: ocsi (Aug 28 2009 - 2:17pm) MUN Prof. wrote:
Yes, as we By: Sineed (Aug 28 2009 - 2:12pm) To clarify, I never said By: ottawaobserver (Aug 28 2009 - 1:45pm) Yes, as we have seen, single By: MUN Prof. (Aug 28 2009 - 1:40pm) I have not been here for a By: pcml (Aug 28 2009 - 1:07pm) Stockholm wrote:
And the By: Darwin OConnor (Aug 28 2009 - 12:50pm) Regulation and strict By: ocsi (Aug 28 2009 - 12:48pm) Stockholm wrote:
Darwin By: mahara (Aug 28 2009 - 12:42pm) Stockholm wrote:
As has By: ocsi (Aug 28 2009 - 12:39pm) Maybe they weren't being By: Stockholm (Aug 28 2009 - 10:51am) How could they have given By: Darwin OConnor (Aug 28 2009 - 10:36am) Darwin OConnor wrote:
SSM By: Stockholm (Aug 28 2009 - 10:36am) Darwin OConnor wrote:
Even By: Sineed (Aug 28 2009 - 10:27am) SSM was unpopular in Canada By: Darwin OConnor (Aug 28 2009 - 10:11am) Actually, I've never met By: Stockholm (Aug 28 2009 - 10:00am) Me too, Boom Boom (nice to By: Sineed (Aug 28 2009 - 9:47am) I agree Dana was treated By: Boom Boom (Aug 27 2009 - 6:43pm) ...just like in the BC By: Stockholm (Aug 27 2009 - 6:38pm) I think the Green party is By: melovesproles (Aug 27 2009 - 6:31pm) Daniel, I'd like to see what By: Stockholm (Aug 27 2009 - 5:33pm) MUN Prof. wrote:
How about a By: kropotkin1951 (Aug 27 2009 - 5:23pm) How about a Royal By: MUN Prof. (Aug 27 2009 - 2:58pm) There was no filibuster, By: sandpiper (Aug 27 2009 - 2:56pm) I highly doubt there was By: madmax (Aug 27 2009 - 2:51pm) You may want to add to it By: Daniel Grice (Aug 27 2009 - 1:10pm)
- Continued here By: remind (Aug 29 2009 - 6:21pm)
- "Resolutions don't matter By: Erik Redburn (Aug 29 2009 - 6:19pm)
- Debater wrote: remind By: Erik Redburn (Aug 29 2009 - 5:52pm)
- I don't give a flying fig By: Erik Redburn (Aug 29 2009 - 5:41pm)
- remind wrote: ... it is By: Debater (Aug 29 2009 - 5:02pm)
- We cross-posted BA. How By: Coyote (Aug 29 2009 - 5:00pm)
- Re: "curious timing". Do you By: Coyote (Aug 29 2009 - 4:58pm)
- I find the timing of her By: Bookish Agrarian (Aug 29 2009 - 4:55pm)
- Coyote wrote: Thank you for By: Unionist (Aug 29 2009 - 4:52pm)
- Thank you for that link, By: Coyote (Aug 29 2009 - 4:47pm)
- remind wrote: What? Are you By: Unionist (Aug 29 2009 - 4:16pm)
- remind wrote: What? Are you By: Bookish Agrarian (Aug 29 2009 - 4:13pm)
- more drift by way of By: NoDifferencePartyPooper (Aug 29 2009 - 4:10pm)
- madmax wrote: 1,000kms or By: Unionist (Aug 29 2009 - 4:02pm)
- What? Are you saying Bill is By: remind (Aug 29 2009 - 3:54pm)
- Oh don't interject fact and By: Bookish Agrarian (Aug 29 2009 - 3:35pm)
- Dana Larsen wrote: I know By: the grey (Aug 29 2009 - 3:18pm)
- ah...but he is not a By: remind (Aug 29 2009 - 2:52pm)
- Bill Siskay is one of the By: Coyote (Aug 29 2009 - 2:30pm)
- Well, I think you are By: remind (Aug 29 2009 - 2:24pm)
- Right. What I am saying is By: Coyote (Aug 29 2009 - 1:20pm)
- Oh...I thought he meant that By: remind (Aug 29 2009 - 1:17pm)
- I was obviously referring to By: Coyote (Aug 29 2009 - 1:05pm)
- Who was doing so coyote? Are By: remind (Aug 29 2009 - 1:00pm)
- It does appear she was in By: Coyote (Aug 29 2009 - 12:50pm)
- Stockholm wrote:I will bet By: remind (Aug 29 2009 - 12:49pm)
- Coyote wrote: Libby is to By: madmax (Aug 29 2009 - 12:35pm)
- Unionist wrote:The problem By: Stockholm (Aug 29 2009 - 11:51am)
- Stockholm wrote: "Why don't By: Aristotleded24 (Aug 29 2009 - 11:35am)
- Re: Investigation into treatment of Dana Larson and the marijuan By: Unionist (Aug 29 2009 - 11:23am)
- The NDP already supports By: Stockholm (Aug 29 2009 - 11:17am)
- Stockholm wrote: If you By: ennir (Aug 29 2009 - 10:36am)
- Stockholm wrote: If you By: Cueball (Aug 29 2009 - 8:13am)
- I don't support an official By: Erik Redburn (Aug 29 2009 - 4:47am)
- Never thought that for a By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 9:31pm)
- remind wrote: The NDP spoke By: Slumberjack (Aug 28 2009 - 8:58pm)
- If you think a chorus of By: Stockholm (Aug 28 2009 - 8:57pm)
- Ya well stockie boy, just By: remind (Aug 29 2009 - 11:58am)
- You have your opinion. By: Stockholm (Aug 28 2009 - 8:27pm)
- Don't give a shit By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 8:06pm)
- Stockholm wrote: NDP By: Aristotleded24 (Aug 28 2009 - 8:03pm)
- NDP policies stand until a By: Stockholm (Aug 28 2009 - 7:41pm)
- Libby until at some point By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 8:13pm)
- Unionist wrote:Instead of By: Pogo (Aug 28 2009 - 7:01pm)
- Ridiculing you? For my part, By: Coyote (Aug 28 2009 - 6:51pm)
- Re: Investigation into treatment of Dana Larson and the marijuan By: Unionist (Aug 28 2009 - 6:45pm)
- Unionist wrote: Dana, I By: Pogo (Aug 28 2009 - 6:12pm)
- Sineed wrote: Unionist By: Coyote (Aug 28 2009 - 6:09pm)
- remind wrote: Unionist those By: janfromthebruce (Aug 28 2009 - 6:04pm)
- She's also house leader By: Stockholm (Aug 28 2009 - 5:57pm)
- Unionist wrote: Sineed, By: Sineed (Aug 28 2009 - 5:56pm)
- Libby is to Jack's left :) By: Coyote (Aug 28 2009 - 5:53pm)
- Libby was in Halifax, at By: Coyote (Aug 28 2009 - 5:47pm)
- Here's what Libby said when By: Unionist (Aug 28 2009 - 5:27pm)
- Unionist those 2 statements By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 5:19pm)
- Dana, thanks that is a far By: Bookish Agrarian (Aug 28 2009 - 5:01pm)
- Darwin OConnor wrote: Buzz By: Unionist (Aug 28 2009 - 4:54pm)
- Dana, I still admire you, By: Unionist (Aug 28 2009 - 4:51pm)
- edit By: MUN Prof. (Aug 28 2009 - 4:52pm)
- Quote:Dana I am going to By: Dana Larsen (Aug 28 2009 - 4:49pm)
- Dana Larsen wrote:I know By: Darwin OConnor (Aug 28 2009 - 4:44pm)
- Sineed wrote: I have no By: Unionist (Aug 28 2009 - 4:42pm)
- MUN Prof. wrote: The issue By: Unionist (Aug 28 2009 - 4:37pm)
- Quote: and if Dana Larsen is By: Dana Larsen (Aug 28 2009 - 4:36pm)
- Dana I am going to call you By: Bookish Agrarian (Aug 28 2009 - 4:35pm)
- Sineed wrote:remind By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 4:22pm)
- Quote:I highly doubt there By: Dana Larsen (Aug 28 2009 - 4:22pm)
- Sineed wrote: remind By: Bookish Agrarian (Aug 28 2009 - 4:22pm)
- Would decriminalization also By: Snert (Aug 28 2009 - 4:18pm)
- Michelle wrote:I don't think By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 4:15pm)
- remind wrote: Sineed, I am By: Sineed (Aug 28 2009 - 4:12pm)
- melovesproles wrote: A By: Slumberjack (Aug 28 2009 - 3:59pm)
- I don't think By: Michelle (Aug 28 2009 - 3:58pm)
- A passionate principled By: melovesproles (Aug 28 2009 - 3:57pm)
- Quote:Who should have the By: melovesproles (Aug 28 2009 - 3:52pm)
- Sineed, I am speaking about By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 3:50pm)
- MUN Prof. wrote: The issue By: Darwin OConnor (Aug 28 2009 - 3:48pm)
- jack layton ? Any here that By: pcml (Aug 28 2009 - 3:48pm)
- Forget blaming Dana, put the By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 3:42pm)
Oh...I thought he meant that the NDP would eventually oust them, or completely marginalize their voices, and not what you suggested at all.
As the NDP looks to be on a track that is not, or will not in the future, be in solid support of who and what they are.
So I guess that is why I did not get who you were obliquely refering to.