Investigation into treatment of Dana Larson and the marijuana resolution needed By: Darwin OConnor (114 replies) August 27, 2009 - 1:05pmThe issue here is not BC or By: MUN Prof. (Aug 28 2009 - 3:42pm) remind wrote:
If heroin By: Sineed (Aug 28 2009 - 3:39pm) melovesproles wrote: I wish By: Slumberjack (Aug 28 2009 - 3:30pm) Quote:Yes, as we have seen, By: melovesproles (Aug 28 2009 - 3:26pm) But Mexico is also building By: pcml (Aug 28 2009 - 3:24pm) Mexico apparently did an By: Snert (Aug 28 2009 - 3:00pm) Dana, I agree that it is a By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 2:55pm) edit
just not worth the By: Bookish Agrarian (Aug 28 2009 - 2:49pm) Quote: Larsen and his gang By: Dana Larsen (Aug 28 2009 - 2:40pm) ... it is obvious the NDP By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 2:34pm) Sineed wrote:
And crack By: ocsi (Aug 28 2009 - 2:17pm) MUN Prof. wrote:
Yes, as we By: Sineed (Aug 28 2009 - 2:12pm) To clarify, I never said By: ottawaobserver (Aug 28 2009 - 1:45pm) Yes, as we have seen, single By: MUN Prof. (Aug 28 2009 - 1:40pm) I have not been here for a By: pcml (Aug 28 2009 - 1:07pm) Stockholm wrote:
And the By: Darwin OConnor (Aug 28 2009 - 12:50pm) Regulation and strict By: ocsi (Aug 28 2009 - 12:48pm) Stockholm wrote:
Darwin By: mahara (Aug 28 2009 - 12:42pm) Stockholm wrote:
As has By: ocsi (Aug 28 2009 - 12:39pm) Maybe they weren't being By: Stockholm (Aug 28 2009 - 10:51am) How could they have given By: Darwin OConnor (Aug 28 2009 - 10:36am) Darwin OConnor wrote:
SSM By: Stockholm (Aug 28 2009 - 10:36am) Darwin OConnor wrote:
Even By: Sineed (Aug 28 2009 - 10:27am) SSM was unpopular in Canada By: Darwin OConnor (Aug 28 2009 - 10:11am) Actually, I've never met By: Stockholm (Aug 28 2009 - 10:00am) Me too, Boom Boom (nice to By: Sineed (Aug 28 2009 - 9:47am) I agree Dana was treated By: Boom Boom (Aug 27 2009 - 6:43pm) ...just like in the BC By: Stockholm (Aug 27 2009 - 6:38pm) I think the Green party is By: melovesproles (Aug 27 2009 - 6:31pm) Daniel, I'd like to see what By: Stockholm (Aug 27 2009 - 5:33pm) MUN Prof. wrote:
How about a By: kropotkin1951 (Aug 27 2009 - 5:23pm) How about a Royal By: MUN Prof. (Aug 27 2009 - 2:58pm) There was no filibuster, By: sandpiper (Aug 27 2009 - 2:56pm) I highly doubt there was By: madmax (Aug 27 2009 - 2:51pm) You may want to add to it By: Daniel Grice (Aug 27 2009 - 1:10pm)
- Continued here By: remind (Aug 29 2009 - 6:21pm)
- "Resolutions don't matter By: Erik Redburn (Aug 29 2009 - 6:19pm)
- Debater wrote: remind By: Erik Redburn (Aug 29 2009 - 5:52pm)
- I don't give a flying fig By: Erik Redburn (Aug 29 2009 - 5:41pm)
- remind wrote: ... it is By: Debater (Aug 29 2009 - 5:02pm)
- We cross-posted BA. How By: Coyote (Aug 29 2009 - 5:00pm)
- Re: "curious timing". Do you By: Coyote (Aug 29 2009 - 4:58pm)
- I find the timing of her By: Bookish Agrarian (Aug 29 2009 - 4:55pm)
- Coyote wrote: Thank you for By: Unionist (Aug 29 2009 - 4:52pm)
- Thank you for that link, By: Coyote (Aug 29 2009 - 4:47pm)
- remind wrote: What? Are you By: Unionist (Aug 29 2009 - 4:16pm)
- remind wrote: What? Are you By: Bookish Agrarian (Aug 29 2009 - 4:13pm)
- more drift by way of By: NoDifferencePartyPooper (Aug 29 2009 - 4:10pm)
- madmax wrote: 1,000kms or By: Unionist (Aug 29 2009 - 4:02pm)
- What? Are you saying Bill is By: remind (Aug 29 2009 - 3:54pm)
- Oh don't interject fact and By: Bookish Agrarian (Aug 29 2009 - 3:35pm)
- Dana Larsen wrote: I know By: the grey (Aug 29 2009 - 3:18pm)
- ah...but he is not a By: remind (Aug 29 2009 - 2:52pm)
- Bill Siskay is one of the By: Coyote (Aug 29 2009 - 2:30pm)
- Well, I think you are By: remind (Aug 29 2009 - 2:24pm)
- Right. What I am saying is By: Coyote (Aug 29 2009 - 1:20pm)
- Oh...I thought he meant that By: remind (Aug 29 2009 - 1:17pm)
- I was obviously referring to By: Coyote (Aug 29 2009 - 1:05pm)
- Who was doing so coyote? Are By: remind (Aug 29 2009 - 1:00pm)
- It does appear she was in By: Coyote (Aug 29 2009 - 12:50pm)
- Stockholm wrote:I will bet By: remind (Aug 29 2009 - 12:49pm)
- Coyote wrote: Libby is to By: madmax (Aug 29 2009 - 12:35pm)
- Unionist wrote:The problem By: Stockholm (Aug 29 2009 - 11:51am)
- Stockholm wrote: "Why don't By: Aristotleded24 (Aug 29 2009 - 11:35am)
- Re: Investigation into treatment of Dana Larson and the marijuan By: Unionist (Aug 29 2009 - 11:23am)
- The NDP already supports By: Stockholm (Aug 29 2009 - 11:17am)
- Stockholm wrote: If you By: ennir (Aug 29 2009 - 10:36am)
- Stockholm wrote: If you By: Cueball (Aug 29 2009 - 8:13am)
- I don't support an official By: Erik Redburn (Aug 29 2009 - 4:47am)
- Never thought that for a By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 9:31pm)
- remind wrote: The NDP spoke By: Slumberjack (Aug 28 2009 - 8:58pm)
- If you think a chorus of By: Stockholm (Aug 28 2009 - 8:57pm)
- Ya well stockie boy, just By: remind (Aug 29 2009 - 11:58am)
- You have your opinion. By: Stockholm (Aug 28 2009 - 8:27pm)
- Don't give a shit By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 8:06pm)
- Stockholm wrote: NDP By: Aristotleded24 (Aug 28 2009 - 8:03pm)
- NDP policies stand until a By: Stockholm (Aug 28 2009 - 7:41pm)
- Libby until at some point By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 8:13pm)
- Unionist wrote:Instead of By: Pogo (Aug 28 2009 - 7:01pm)
- Ridiculing you? For my part, By: Coyote (Aug 28 2009 - 6:51pm)
- Re: Investigation into treatment of Dana Larson and the marijuan By: Unionist (Aug 28 2009 - 6:45pm)
- Unionist wrote: Dana, I By: Pogo (Aug 28 2009 - 6:12pm)
- Sineed wrote: Unionist By: Coyote (Aug 28 2009 - 6:09pm)
- remind wrote: Unionist those By: janfromthebruce (Aug 28 2009 - 6:04pm)
- She's also house leader By: Stockholm (Aug 28 2009 - 5:57pm)
- Unionist wrote: Sineed, By: Sineed (Aug 28 2009 - 5:56pm)
- Libby is to Jack's left :) By: Coyote (Aug 28 2009 - 5:53pm)
- Libby was in Halifax, at By: Coyote (Aug 28 2009 - 5:47pm)
- Here's what Libby said when By: Unionist (Aug 28 2009 - 5:27pm)
- Unionist those 2 statements By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 5:19pm)
- Dana, thanks that is a far By: Bookish Agrarian (Aug 28 2009 - 5:01pm)
- Darwin OConnor wrote: Buzz By: Unionist (Aug 28 2009 - 4:54pm)
- Dana, I still admire you, By: Unionist (Aug 28 2009 - 4:51pm)
- edit By: MUN Prof. (Aug 28 2009 - 4:52pm)
- Quote:Dana I am going to By: Dana Larsen (Aug 28 2009 - 4:49pm)
- Dana Larsen wrote:I know By: Darwin OConnor (Aug 28 2009 - 4:44pm)
- Sineed wrote: I have no By: Unionist (Aug 28 2009 - 4:42pm)
- MUN Prof. wrote: The issue By: Unionist (Aug 28 2009 - 4:37pm)
- Quote: and if Dana Larsen is By: Dana Larsen (Aug 28 2009 - 4:36pm)
- Dana I am going to call you By: Bookish Agrarian (Aug 28 2009 - 4:35pm)
- Sineed wrote:remind By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 4:22pm)
- Quote:I highly doubt there By: Dana Larsen (Aug 28 2009 - 4:22pm)
- Sineed wrote: remind By: Bookish Agrarian (Aug 28 2009 - 4:22pm)
- Would decriminalization also By: Snert (Aug 28 2009 - 4:18pm)
- Michelle wrote:I don't think By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 4:15pm)
- remind wrote: Sineed, I am By: Sineed (Aug 28 2009 - 4:12pm)
- melovesproles wrote: A By: Slumberjack (Aug 28 2009 - 3:59pm)
- I don't think By: Michelle (Aug 28 2009 - 3:58pm)
- A passionate principled By: melovesproles (Aug 28 2009 - 3:57pm)
- Quote:Who should have the By: melovesproles (Aug 28 2009 - 3:52pm)
- Sineed, I am speaking about By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 3:50pm)
- MUN Prof. wrote: The issue By: Darwin OConnor (Aug 28 2009 - 3:48pm)
- jack layton ? Any here that By: pcml (Aug 28 2009 - 3:48pm)
- Forget blaming Dana, put the By: remind (Aug 28 2009 - 3:42pm)
Re: "curious timing". Do you suppose Brad Lavigne conspired with Code Pink to keep Libby away from Convention?
Nah, that would be absurd. Especially given her presence at Convention (the picture is from the third day). I mean, who conspires to send someone thousands of miles away from somewhere, but doesn't ensure that they aren't able to attend?
No one would believe that. That would just be too absurd.
As absurd as suggesting that the House Leader and Co-Deputy Leader of the NDP is somehow on thin ice with the party.
And that truly is absurd, as I'm sure you would agree.