"We also have no history of colonialism" - Harper lying at the G20 By: martin dufresne (37 replies) September 26, 2009 - 9:44pm
Where was the By: NoDifferencePartyPooper (Oct 5 2009 - 1:30am) Colonialism - Who, us? By: M. Spector (Oct 2 2009 - 5:32pm) we received an email back By: effandtee (Sep 30 2009 - 10:56am) Quote from the article By: Boom Boom (Sep 30 2009 - 9:29am) FYI, Yves Engler has a By: N.Beltov (Sep 30 2009 - 9:06am) Then we have the issue of By: Machjo (Sep 30 2009 - 12:15am) ditto - good to do this. By: janfromthebruce (Sep 29 2009 - 8:21pm) Oh and good on ya, By: remind (Sep 29 2009 - 7:19pm) So...Olivia took exception By: remind (Sep 29 2009 - 7:18pm) we've decided to take this By: effandtee (Sep 29 2009 - 7:08pm) we've decided to take this By: effandtee (Sep 29 2009 - 7:08pm) Yeah......Jean!
Thanks Kim! By: remind (Sep 29 2009 - 6:07pm) Jean Crowder (NDP, By: kim elliott (Sep 29 2009 - 5:55pm) Why should they step forward By: martin dufresne (Sep 29 2009 - 12:22am) Boom Boom wrote:
WRT the By: Machjo (Sep 28 2009 - 11:42pm) Good answer! By: Boom Boom (Sep 28 2009 - 4:24pm) Th penis commentary is just By: remind (Sep 28 2009 - 4:23pm) I'll choose B: "rolling By: Lard Tunderin Jeezus (Sep 28 2009 - 4:21pm) WRT the thread title, has no By: Boom Boom (Sep 28 2009 - 4:04pm) It's a good thing he has a By: KeyStone (Sep 28 2009 - 11:19am) the reactionary right, which By: clandestiny (Sep 27 2009 - 3:54pm) The internal/external By: Eric Lloyd Smith (Sep 27 2009 - 3:04pm) And how do we explain By: Machjo (Sep 27 2009 - 1:12pm) Making the Indigenous FACT By: NoDifferencePartyPooper (Sep 27 2009 - 1:12pm) Once again Stephen Harper By: Lard Tunderin Jeezus (Sep 27 2009 - 12:33pm) In response to the By: Machjo (Sep 27 2009 - 12:06pm) Yeah. By: Ken Burch (Sep 27 2009 - 2:11am) Haha.
Just like the U.S. By: -=+=- (Sep 27 2009 - 1:45am) OK...then "'no history of By: Ken Burch (Sep 27 2009 - 12:39am) Harper was speaking to By: remind (Sep 27 2009 - 12:39am) Ken Burch wrote:
Now, By: Frmrsldr (Sep 27 2009 - 12:19am) Harper is such a piece of By: Boom Boom (Sep 26 2009 - 10:15pm) deleted By: Michael Nenonen (Feb 25 2012 - 1:22pm) That's how invisible first By: 500_Apples (Sep 26 2009 - 9:51pm) Now, Now...he meant no By: Ken Burch (Sep 26 2009 - 9:47pm)
- And instead of the British By: Fidel (Nov 17 2009 - 5:07am)
- I'm a bit late on the scene, By: Arius (Nov 17 2009 - 4:25am)
In response to the OP:
Even if what Harper said were true, it would have come across as tactless and arrogant. Now as for the indigenous people's being invisible, tell me about it. I've read a few books discussing French and English Canadians ad nauseum with not a mention of the First Nations. Two examples that come to mind are Lament for a Notion by Scott Reid MP and Sorry I don't Speak French by Graham Fraser, now the Commissioner of Official Languages. In neither case do the First Nations even exist. I remember e-mailing the Assemblée de la francophonie de l'Ontario (AFO)awhile back asking about its opinion of the First Nations in Ontario, and the response was that that assosiation's mandate is to defend the French language in Ontario but had nothing against other language communities defending their rights. Well, if we think about it, it's clear that millions of French Canadians are far more capable of defending their rights than a few thousand First Nations. Granted, this applies even more so to the English-speaking Community. Canadians for Language Fairness is so focussed on French and English that First Nations don't even cross their minds and even react to them as a pseky nuisance. So yes, teh First Nations are invisible to many across Canada.