Michelle
\,,/ rabble-rouser-l33t \,,/
Member: 1560
Joined: May 10 2001

If one of those former sex workers comes to babble and asks us to start calling them "prostituted people" then we will consider that.  Until then, I'm not going to demand that people adopt one term over the other since I think this is one of those issues where feminists on both sides of the issue use terminology that they feel is most descriptive of their position. 

But I also think that outright dismissal of the requests of people directly involved in sex work when it comes to terminology they prefer is not okay.

I think writer mentioned this a couple of weeks ago before she left (wish she'd come back!) - babble is an open forum, and anyone can (and does) join.  All women, including women who have left the sex trade and share Martin's opinion, are welcome to come here and discuss this issue.  Men are welcome to discuss it too.  But male voices, even ones claiming to speak for women they know who aren't here to speak for themselves, will not be privileged above the voices of women who have direct experience and involvement in this industry. 

I would like the women who are sharing their experiences with us to be respected.


Charter challenge launched against prostitution law By: Doug (86 replies) October 6, 2009 - 8:15am
  • It isn't just a matter of By: Stargazer (Oct 7 2009 - 6:51pm)
  • Answering Stargazer about By: martin dufresne (Oct 7 2009 - 8:16pm)
  • martin dufresne By: Unionist (Oct 7 2009 - 5:54pm)
  • Sorry Martin, there is not a By: Stargazer (Oct 7 2009 - 5:49pm)
  • Re: Charter challenge launched against prostitution law By: martin dufresne (Oct 7 2009 - 5:39pm)
  • martin dufresne wrote: Just By: Unionist (Oct 7 2009 - 5:08pm)
  • That's great Martin but By: Stargazer (Oct 7 2009 - 4:08pm)
  • Contestation à la Cour By: martin dufresne (Oct 7 2009 - 3:49pm)
  • I read through all of By: Stargazer (Oct 7 2009 - 2:43pm)
  • Just to be clear Unionist: I By: martin dufresne (Oct 7 2009 - 1:52pm)
  • I'm of two minds about the By: Unionist (Oct 7 2009 - 1:45pm)
  • A non sequitur. And By: martin dufresne (Oct 7 2009 - 1:26pm)
  • The difference being that By: Stargazer (Oct 7 2009 - 1:20pm)
  • Sorry, but no cigar. Neither By: martin dufresne (Oct 7 2009 - 1:09pm)
  • Okay then Martin, I'll use a By: Stargazer (Oct 7 2009 - 12:43pm)
  • And, I'm told, liberals. Not By: martin dufresne (Oct 7 2009 - 12:25pm)
  • Stargazer wrote: "I don't By: martin dufresne (Oct 7 2009 - 12:19pm)
  • Janine BenedetLegalization By: martin dufresne (Oct 7 2009 - 12:16pm)
  • Perhaps.  I'm glad you By: Snert (Oct 7 2009 - 12:07pm)
  • Actually I haven't formed a By: Stargazer (Oct 7 2009 - 12:02pm)
  • Quote:Well, think about it By: Snert (Oct 7 2009 - 11:50am)
  • Exactly Michelle.  It is By: Ghislaine (Oct 7 2009 - 11:45am)
  • Martin doesn't agree with By: Michelle (Oct 7 2009 - 11:44am)
  • Well, think about it this By: Michelle (Oct 7 2009 - 11:40am)
  • I'm not sure how this is to By: Stargazer (Oct 7 2009 - 11:22am)
  • Okay, I know I've done it By: Michelle (Oct 7 2009 - 11:14am)
  • If I was betting on this By: Caissa (Oct 7 2009 - 10:46am)
  • There are feminists who By: just one of the concerned (Oct 7 2009 - 10:41am)
  • vancouver.24hrs.ca By: martin dufresne (Oct 6 2009 - 9:35pm)
  • i will be live on CTV 4 pm By: susan davis (Oct 6 2009 - 5:32pm)
  • martin dufresne wrote: The By: Ghislaine (Oct 6 2009 - 10:40am)
  • CBC story: A new coalition By: martin dufresne (Oct 6 2009 - 10:01am)
  • Yes, I'll move it to the By: Michelle (Oct 6 2009 - 8:14am)
  • Prostitution laws dead By: Ghislaine (Oct 6 2009 - 8:06am)
  • Given how past discussions By: Ghislaine (Oct 5 2009 - 9:45pm)