Sex trade - Harm Reduction By: Infosaturated (103 replies) October 9, 2009 - 11:43amDid anyone catch Janine By: martin dufresne (Oct 11 2009 - 10:01pm) (double post) By: martin dufresne (Oct 11 2009 - 10:01pm) Yes, I would consider them By: remind (Oct 11 2009 - 9:52pm) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ By: Infosaturated (Oct 11 2009 - 9:18pm) Infosaturated wrote:remind By: remind (Oct 11 2009 - 8:43pm) (No subject) By: remind (Oct 11 2009 - 7:44pm) Why are leftists so immature By: martin dufresne (Oct 11 2009 - 7:38pm) Faith, ya right, I have been By: remind (Oct 11 2009 - 7:28pm) Voice of a prostitute who By: CMOT Dibbler (Oct 11 2009 - 7:20pm) remind wrote:
And I am By: Infosaturated (Oct 11 2009 - 7:16pm)
Ground rules need to By: CMOT Dibbler (Oct 11 2009 - 7:13pm) *bump* By: remind (Oct 11 2009 - 6:30pm) Ground rules need to be By: remind (Oct 11 2009 - 5:45pm) I am pro decriminalization By: CMOT Dibbler (Oct 11 2009 - 5:47pm) Then she should have stated By: remind (Oct 11 2009 - 5:35pm) Soliciting by women and By: martin dufresne (Oct 11 2009 - 5:29pm) What a BS starting By: remind (Oct 11 2009 - 5:18pm) I am pro decriminalization By: Infosaturated (Oct 11 2009 - 4:57pm) In whose world do you live By: remind (Oct 11 2009 - 5:01pm) What you are proposing By: CMOT Dibbler (Oct 11 2009 - 4:05pm) Isn't that a bit unfair, By: CMOT Dibbler (Oct 11 2009 - 11:06am) Janine Benedet, from By: martin dufresne (Oct 10 2009 - 9:10pm) CMOT Dibbler wrote:
If our By: Infosaturated (Oct 10 2009 - 8:52pm) Isn't that a bit unfair, By: martin dufresne (Oct 10 2009 - 7:50pm) If our focus was on any By: CMOT Dibbler (Oct 10 2009 - 6:55pm) could we not at least By: susan davis (Oct 10 2009 - 10:07am) susan davis wrote:
i would By: Infosaturated (Oct 9 2009 - 4:18pm) i would like share how By: susan davis (Oct 9 2009 - 1:25pm) I appreciate your By: martin dufresne (Oct 9 2009 - 12:44pm) it's my belief those who By: susan davis (Oct 9 2009 - 12:40pm) Actually, I change my By: Michelle (Oct 9 2009 - 11:34am) I also agree that this is By: Michelle (Oct 9 2009 - 8:22am) Is there a reason for thread By: Unionist (Oct 9 2009 - 7:50am) Harm redcution emerged from By: peasant woman (Oct 9 2009 - 7:45am) CLES has a committee working By: martin dufresne (Oct 9 2009 - 3:53am)
- Closing for length By: oldgoat (Oct 29 2009 - 11:18am)
- Caissa This time I enjoyed By: Lee Lakeman (Oct 29 2009 - 10:15am)
- Remind wrote: Okay, I am By: Caissa (Oct 29 2009 - 6:59am)
- ach Lee, I did not even By: remind (Oct 28 2009 - 9:37pm)
- skdadl wrote: I don't By: Lee Lakeman (Oct 28 2009 - 8:54pm)
- Okay, I am willing to be By: remind (Oct 28 2009 - 8:44pm)
- remind wrote: All things By: skdadl (Oct 28 2009 - 8:39pm)
- Quote:The stigma has been By: remind (Oct 28 2009 - 8:40pm)
- What we seem to be grappling By: skdadl (Oct 28 2009 - 7:57pm)
- skdadl wrote: One thing I By: Infosaturated (Oct 28 2009 - 7:31pm)
- Quote:instead of dumping By: remind (Oct 28 2009 - 7:30pm)
- I apologize I was pasting a By: Lee Lakeman (Oct 28 2009 - 6:53pm)
- Yes stigma is a problem, a By: Lee Lakeman (Oct 28 2009 - 6:55pm)
- martin dufresne wrote: Or, By: skdadl (Oct 28 2009 - 6:49pm)
- Or, instead of dumping that By: martin dufresne (Oct 28 2009 - 6:41pm)
- Maybe we should have a By: skdadl (Oct 28 2009 - 6:36pm)
- skdadl wrote:I think it By: Infosaturated (Oct 28 2009 - 6:07pm)
- martin dufresne wrote: It By: skdadl (Oct 28 2009 - 5:55pm)
- Yes skdadl, most people By: Lee Lakeman (Oct 28 2009 - 5:55pm)
- Exactly remind. This class By: Lee Lakeman (Oct 28 2009 - 5:46pm)
- It would be egregious By: martin dufresne (Oct 28 2009 - 5:45pm)
- Lee Lakeman By: skdadl (Oct 28 2009 - 5:33pm)
- Thanks Lee that is By: remind (Oct 28 2009 - 5:00pm)
- The term used by those By: Lee Lakeman (Oct 28 2009 - 4:50pm)
- ....anyway back on By: remind (Oct 28 2009 - 4:47pm)
- Infosaturated wrote: the By: skdadl (Oct 28 2009 - 4:06pm)
- Laws, in theory, cannot be By: remind (Oct 28 2009 - 3:50pm)
- skdadl wrote: We have so By: Infosaturated (Oct 28 2009 - 3:34pm)
- That's the first time (Noah By: skdadl (Oct 28 2009 - 3:45pm)
- Quote:Prohibition is the By: remind (Oct 28 2009 - 2:31pm)
- Noah_Scape wrote: By: Infosaturated (Oct 28 2009 - 1:30pm)
- Prohibition is the problem - By: Noah_Scape (Oct 28 2009 - 12:59pm)
- Hi...I think that's what By: peasant woman (Oct 15 2009 - 9:58am)
- peasant woman wrote: While By: Infosaturated (Oct 14 2009 - 1:19am)
- skdadl wrote: I'm not sure By: Infosaturated (Oct 14 2009 - 1:08am)
- While this is all By: peasant woman (Oct 14 2009 - 1:07am)
- Thanks skdadl! By: remind (Oct 13 2009 - 11:06am)
- Your presence here is not By: Michelle (Oct 13 2009 - 11:05am)
- No no no. We need more By: Stargazer (Oct 13 2009 - 10:59am)
- remind wrote: "Concern By: skdadl (Oct 13 2009 - 10:46am)
- definition of sex worker vs By: susan davis (Oct 13 2009 - 2:28am)
- martin dufresne By: susan davis (Oct 13 2009 - 2:12am)
- well that definition could By: remind (Oct 12 2009 - 10:12pm)
- From Wikipedia A concern By: Infosaturated (Oct 12 2009 - 9:40pm)
- "Concern trolling for By: remind (Oct 12 2009 - 8:09pm)
- skdadl wrote: Infosaturated, By: Infosaturated (Oct 12 2009 - 8:05pm)
- Skdadl, thanks for your By: Unionist (Oct 12 2009 - 7:54pm)
- Infosaturated wrote: skdadl By: skdadl (Oct 12 2009 - 7:44pm)
- Infosaturated wrote: Your By: skdadl (Oct 12 2009 - 7:37pm)
- skdadl wrote: What has By: Infosaturated (Oct 12 2009 - 7:32pm)
- skdadl, I am fine with using By: martin dufresne (Oct 12 2009 - 7:38pm)
- skdadl wrote: Gee, I arrive, By: Infosaturated (Oct 12 2009 - 7:25pm)
- CASAC's Lee Lakeman answered By: martin dufresne (Oct 12 2009 - 7:12pm)
- Gee, I arrive, and suddenly By: skdadl (Oct 12 2009 - 6:20pm)
- Faith, ya right, I have been By: CMOT Dibbler (Oct 12 2009 - 4:23pm)
- skdadl wrote: People might By: Infosaturated (Oct 12 2009 - 12:54pm)
- Some facts that challenge By: martin dufresne (Oct 12 2009 - 12:29pm)
- Skdadl, it has been pointed By: martin dufresne (Oct 12 2009 - 10:31am)
- Excellent post Skdadl and I By: Stargazer (Oct 12 2009 - 9:29am)
- I've been reading Antonia's By: Michelle (Oct 12 2009 - 9:18am)
- People might be interested By: skdadl (Oct 12 2009 - 8:29am)
- CMOT Dibbler wrote: Voice of By: Infosaturated (Oct 12 2009 - 1:42am)
- Just got finished watching By: remind (Oct 12 2009 - 1:09am)
- You'll have to wait as it By: martin dufresne (Oct 11 2009 - 11:06pm)
- Going to watch it in 8 By: remind (Oct 11 2009 - 10:52pm)
- martin dufresne wrote: Did By: Infosaturated (Oct 11 2009 - 10:45pm)
- remind wrote: Yes, I would By: Infosaturated (Oct 11 2009 - 10:44pm)
- Thinking about Harm Reduction By: martin dufresne (Oct 9 2009 - 11:36am)
Prohibition is the problem - let the hookers set up shoppe and run it like any business. That way they can protect themselves.
Meanwhile, harm reduction is the next best thing. Using condoms is harm reduction, and it has been helpfull and it is now accepted as "standard equiptment" when paying for sex.
I want to add one thing off topic - this whole SEX thing is a little wierd isn't it? Mostly, for the men I mean - it just seems like their natural instincts are being used to control them, and to take their money from them, like hanging out a carrot that they cannot resist. I think it would be liberating for males to lose their sex addiction... but apparently then there wouldn't be much worth living for? Really?