At the UN, Dutch try to defend abject failure of liberalization of prostitution laws By: Infosaturated (63 replies) October 28, 2009 - 2:54pmfortunate wrote: But I can By: Infosaturated (Nov 3 2009 - 10:00pm) Infosaturated By: fortunate (Nov 3 2009 - 9:46pm) martin dufresne By: fortunate (Nov 3 2009 - 9:39pm) "(How long can we keep By: remind (Nov 3 2009 - 3:56pm) ...realistically you first By: martin dufresne (Nov 3 2009 - 9:41am) fortunate wrote: The By: Infosaturated (Nov 3 2009 - 2:54am) remind wrote:
what sex By: fortunate (Nov 3 2009 - 1:40am) I don't want to create yet By: martin dufresne (Nov 3 2009 - 12:12am) susan davis By: Infosaturated (Nov 1 2009 - 12:35pm) Infosaturated wrote:
To get By: susan davis (Nov 1 2009 - 12:09pm) Annie Temple wrote:
I do not By: susan davis (Nov 1 2009 - 12:08pm) To get back to the point, By: Infosaturated (Nov 1 2009 - 12:03pm) I do not feel I have to By: Annie Temple (Nov 1 2009 - 11:24am) so true babe!! By: susan davis (Oct 31 2009 - 7:56pm) susan davis wrote:
excuse By: fortunate (Oct 31 2009 - 6:02pm) Links? By: remind (Oct 31 2009 - 3:23pm) fortunate, ingrid......? By: susan davis (Oct 31 2009 - 3:11pm) what sex workers who engage By: remind (Oct 31 2009 - 3:05pm) excuse me, other sex workers By: susan davis (Oct 31 2009 - 12:23pm) Trisha Baptie, jmartin, By: remind (Oct 31 2009 - 12:06pm) 3 or 4? once again....i have By: susan davis (Oct 31 2009 - 10:53am) Quote:Silencing people by By: remind (Oct 30 2009 - 6:17pm) Silencing people by deeming By: Annie Temple (Oct 30 2009 - 5:47pm) Annie Temple wrote:I'm By: remind (Oct 30 2009 - 1:11pm) I'm confused. You need two By: Annie Temple (Oct 30 2009 - 11:39am) remind wrote:
Don't see an By: susan davis (Oct 30 2009 - 11:25am) Don't see an impasse at all, By: remind (Oct 30 2009 - 10:58am) Bacchus, please don't tell By: Michelle (Oct 30 2009 - 5:58am) Info, when I read the By: remind (Oct 29 2009 - 11:46pm) Martin-Fuck off
Info-If a By: Bacchus (Oct 29 2009 - 10:45pm) Bacchus wrote:
Isn't this By: Infosaturated (Oct 28 2009 - 11:26pm) You might want to consult a By: martin dufresne (Oct 28 2009 - 9:54pm) answer resides in this By: remind (Oct 28 2009 - 9:49pm) Isn't this topic already in By: Bacchus (Oct 28 2009 - 9:19pm) The Netherlands talks big on By: Infosaturated (Oct 28 2009 - 2:56pm)
- And this thread is now By: Michelle (Nov 5 2009 - 10:39pm)
- Infosaturated is suspended By: Michelle (Nov 5 2009 - 10:38pm)
- $10,000.00 fine....are you By: susan davis (Nov 5 2009 - 8:21pm)
- Infosaturated wrote: Every By: susan davis (Nov 5 2009 - 8:19pm)
- you know, i think the mods By: susan davis (Nov 5 2009 - 8:10pm)
- Edited to add the comment I By: Infosaturated (Nov 5 2009 - 9:46pm)
- Ghislaine wrote: I agree By: fortunate (Nov 5 2009 - 7:51pm)
- I agree with Info on post By: Ghislaine (Nov 5 2009 - 12:51pm)
- Well said, and to the point. By: martin dufresne (Nov 5 2009 - 12:45pm)
- Michelle wrote:There are By: Infosaturated (Nov 5 2009 - 12:32pm)
- P.S. The attacks on Susan By: Michelle (Nov 4 2009 - 5:07pm)
- I posted this in another By: Michelle (Nov 4 2009 - 5:00pm)
- susan davis wrote:and no By: remind (Nov 4 2009 - 4:44pm)
- susan davis wrote:no? i By: Infosaturated (Nov 4 2009 - 3:25pm)
- Hear, hear. Susan's calling By: martin dufresne (Nov 4 2009 - 3:11pm)
- susan davis wrote: your By: Infosaturated (Nov 4 2009 - 3:15pm)
- and no comment or apology By: susan davis (Nov 4 2009 - 12:52pm)
- no? i can see clearly that By: susan davis (Nov 4 2009 - 12:50pm)
- "worker" indicates a chosen By: remind (Nov 4 2009 - 12:42pm)
- also we have gone over this By: susan davis (Nov 4 2009 - 10:57am)
- you know what, you guys By: susan davis (Nov 4 2009 - 10:54am)
- fortunate wrote: You have By: Infosaturated (Nov 4 2009 - 9:33am)
- remind wrote: I agree it has By: fortunate (Nov 3 2009 - 11:19pm)
- I agree it has not been By: remind (Nov 3 2009 - 11:17pm)
- .... and it is a By: fortunate (Nov 3 2009 - 11:15pm)
- Infosaturated By: fortunate (Nov 3 2009 - 11:12pm)
- fortunate wrote: I do not By: Infosaturated (Nov 3 2009 - 10:53pm)
- Infosaturated By: fortunate (Nov 3 2009 - 10:18pm)
Isn't this topic already in another forum. Shouldn't you address your concerns there to debate which point of view seems correct?
Babble tends to frown on multiple threads on the exact same topic
You might want to consult a mod
A mod already commented here: #2 (permalink)
I hope this will be an acceptable solution to this impasse. Everyone is welcome to discuss the issue in the feminism forum OR the sex worker rights forum, but the sex worker rights forum will be primarily from the perspective of people who have been sex workers, while the discussions in the feminism forum will be basically open to all feminist perspectives.
I don't feel comfortable in the "Sex Workers Rights" forum and I prefer a more democratic discussion "open to all feminist perspectives" so I decided to offer my thoughts here rather than in the more restricted forum. As noted by the mod you are free to participate in either thread so I don't see a problem. If you feel the need for a more protected environment it is available to you.