At the UN, Dutch try to defend abject failure of liberalization of prostitution laws By: Infosaturated (63 replies) October 28, 2009 - 2:54pmfortunate wrote: But I can By: Infosaturated (Nov 3 2009 - 10:00pm) Infosaturated By: fortunate (Nov 3 2009 - 9:46pm) martin dufresne By: fortunate (Nov 3 2009 - 9:39pm) "(How long can we keep By: remind (Nov 3 2009 - 3:56pm) ...realistically you first By: martin dufresne (Nov 3 2009 - 9:41am) fortunate wrote: The By: Infosaturated (Nov 3 2009 - 2:54am) remind wrote:
what sex By: fortunate (Nov 3 2009 - 1:40am) I don't want to create yet By: martin dufresne (Nov 3 2009 - 12:12am) susan davis By: Infosaturated (Nov 1 2009 - 12:35pm) Infosaturated wrote:
To get By: susan davis (Nov 1 2009 - 12:09pm) Annie Temple wrote:
I do not By: susan davis (Nov 1 2009 - 12:08pm) To get back to the point, By: Infosaturated (Nov 1 2009 - 12:03pm) I do not feel I have to By: Annie Temple (Nov 1 2009 - 11:24am) so true babe!! By: susan davis (Oct 31 2009 - 7:56pm) susan davis wrote:
excuse By: fortunate (Oct 31 2009 - 6:02pm) Links? By: remind (Oct 31 2009 - 3:23pm) fortunate, ingrid......? By: susan davis (Oct 31 2009 - 3:11pm) what sex workers who engage By: remind (Oct 31 2009 - 3:05pm) excuse me, other sex workers By: susan davis (Oct 31 2009 - 12:23pm) Trisha Baptie, jmartin, By: remind (Oct 31 2009 - 12:06pm) 3 or 4? once again....i have By: susan davis (Oct 31 2009 - 10:53am) Quote:Silencing people by By: remind (Oct 30 2009 - 6:17pm) Silencing people by deeming By: Annie Temple (Oct 30 2009 - 5:47pm) Annie Temple wrote:I'm By: remind (Oct 30 2009 - 1:11pm) I'm confused. You need two By: Annie Temple (Oct 30 2009 - 11:39am) remind wrote:
Don't see an By: susan davis (Oct 30 2009 - 11:25am) Don't see an impasse at all, By: remind (Oct 30 2009 - 10:58am) Bacchus, please don't tell By: Michelle (Oct 30 2009 - 5:58am) Info, when I read the By: remind (Oct 29 2009 - 11:46pm) Martin-Fuck off
Info-If a By: Bacchus (Oct 29 2009 - 10:45pm) Bacchus wrote:
Isn't this By: Infosaturated (Oct 28 2009 - 11:26pm) You might want to consult a By: martin dufresne (Oct 28 2009 - 9:54pm) answer resides in this By: remind (Oct 28 2009 - 9:49pm) Isn't this topic already in By: Bacchus (Oct 28 2009 - 9:19pm) The Netherlands talks big on By: Infosaturated (Oct 28 2009 - 2:56pm)
- And this thread is now By: Michelle (Nov 5 2009 - 10:39pm)
- Infosaturated is suspended By: Michelle (Nov 5 2009 - 10:38pm)
- $10,000.00 fine....are you By: susan davis (Nov 5 2009 - 8:21pm)
- Infosaturated wrote: Every By: susan davis (Nov 5 2009 - 8:19pm)
- you know, i think the mods By: susan davis (Nov 5 2009 - 8:10pm)
- Edited to add the comment I By: Infosaturated (Nov 5 2009 - 9:46pm)
- Ghislaine wrote: I agree By: fortunate (Nov 5 2009 - 7:51pm)
- I agree with Info on post By: Ghislaine (Nov 5 2009 - 12:51pm)
- Well said, and to the point. By: martin dufresne (Nov 5 2009 - 12:45pm)
- Michelle wrote:There are By: Infosaturated (Nov 5 2009 - 12:32pm)
- P.S. The attacks on Susan By: Michelle (Nov 4 2009 - 5:07pm)
- I posted this in another By: Michelle (Nov 4 2009 - 5:00pm)
- susan davis wrote:and no By: remind (Nov 4 2009 - 4:44pm)
- susan davis wrote:no? i By: Infosaturated (Nov 4 2009 - 3:25pm)
- Hear, hear. Susan's calling By: martin dufresne (Nov 4 2009 - 3:11pm)
- susan davis wrote: your By: Infosaturated (Nov 4 2009 - 3:15pm)
- and no comment or apology By: susan davis (Nov 4 2009 - 12:52pm)
- no? i can see clearly that By: susan davis (Nov 4 2009 - 12:50pm)
- "worker" indicates a chosen By: remind (Nov 4 2009 - 12:42pm)
- also we have gone over this By: susan davis (Nov 4 2009 - 10:57am)
- you know what, you guys By: susan davis (Nov 4 2009 - 10:54am)
- fortunate wrote: You have By: Infosaturated (Nov 4 2009 - 9:33am)
- remind wrote: I agree it has By: fortunate (Nov 3 2009 - 11:19pm)
- I agree it has not been By: remind (Nov 3 2009 - 11:17pm)
- .... and it is a By: fortunate (Nov 3 2009 - 11:15pm)
- Infosaturated By: fortunate (Nov 3 2009 - 11:12pm)
- fortunate wrote: I do not By: Infosaturated (Nov 3 2009 - 10:53pm)
- Infosaturated By: fortunate (Nov 3 2009 - 10:18pm)
Silencing people by deeming them too incompetent to speak for themselves is oppressive. For example, not respecting the preferred terminology of people who are working for health, safety, and the rights of sex workers on a day to day basis, in the thick of the frontlines, conducting ethical research about the needs of sex workers on the street, etc. Discriminating against people based on their occupation, is oppressive. For instance, lobbying to have all their customers criminalized; closing down strip clubs or outlawing them in certain municipalities; police raids on legitimate businesses taking the "trafficked" women out in handcuffs. Presuming to speak on behalf of all sex workers, ignoring their voices, and lobbying against safe work spaces, is oppressive. For example, former sex workers who had terrible experiences referring to all sex workers as "prostituted."
I hope to be a priveleged business owner, as I have not made a profit yet. But I admitted my business owner status as an invitation to disparage me (as I knew you would). I stand as one sex industry business owner who is not afraid of your oppressive tactics. Your words don't say anything about me. But they sure say something about you. Prejudiced.