remind
\,,/ rabble-rouser-l33t \,,/
Member: 7289
Joined: Jun 25 2004

Trisha Baptie, jmartin, Infosaturated, and another, self proclaimed prostitute stepped forwad last evening as well, was just reading the post when the hydro went out, and have been trying to find it again. And there is only you, in the "sex worker" category, as per explained parameters of what that term meant in this case of forum development.

 

So...not sure what you  are not getting, about the sex worker's rights forum and the self identified prostitutes issues with it,  nor  about how those you have brought into it,  really do not apply to the forum's mandate, as they already have rights under the current laws, because they do not have oral and inter-genital contact.

 

As such, they fill a completely different category of sex worker, and are only allies of yours, at best.

 

Because they are self declared business owners, in the non-contact sex industry, their voices have even less weight, as one can only see them as lobbyists, to bolster their business. And they have even said so here that that is want they want.

It is not disrespectful to indicate all of this, it is the way things are.

 

If you respresent others, who are independant prostitutes, why is it only legit business owners and their customers that are appearing here?

 

 

 

 


At the UN, Dutch try to defend abject failure of liberalization of prostitution laws By: Infosaturated (63 replies) October 28, 2009 - 3:54pm
  • fortunate wrote:  But I can By: Infosaturated (Nov 3 2009 - 11:00pm)
  • Infosaturated By: fortunate (Nov 3 2009 - 10:46pm)
  • martin dufresne By: fortunate (Nov 3 2009 - 10:39pm)
  • "(How long can we keep By: remind (Nov 3 2009 - 4:56pm)
  • ...realistically you first By: martin dufresne (Nov 3 2009 - 10:41am)
  • fortunate wrote: The By: Infosaturated (Nov 3 2009 - 3:54am)
  • remind wrote: what sex By: fortunate (Nov 3 2009 - 2:40am)
  • I don't want to create yet By: martin dufresne (Nov 3 2009 - 1:12am)
  • susan davis By: Infosaturated (Nov 1 2009 - 1:35pm)
  • Infosaturated wrote: To get By: susan davis (Nov 1 2009 - 1:09pm)
  • Annie Temple wrote: I do not By: susan davis (Nov 1 2009 - 1:08pm)
  • To get back to the point, By: Infosaturated (Nov 1 2009 - 1:03pm)
  • I do not feel I have to By: Annie Temple (Nov 1 2009 - 12:24pm)
  • so true babe!! By: susan davis (Oct 31 2009 - 8:56pm)
  • susan davis wrote: excuse By: fortunate (Oct 31 2009 - 7:02pm)
  • Links? By: remind (Oct 31 2009 - 4:23pm)
  • fortunate, ingrid......? By: susan davis (Oct 31 2009 - 4:11pm)
  • what sex workers who engage By: remind (Oct 31 2009 - 4:05pm)
  • excuse me, other sex workers By: susan davis (Oct 31 2009 - 1:23pm)
  • Trisha Baptie, jmartin, By: remind (Oct 31 2009 - 1:06pm)
  • 3 or 4? once again....i have By: susan davis (Oct 31 2009 - 11:53am)
  • Quote:Silencing people by By: remind (Oct 30 2009 - 7:17pm)
  • Silencing people by deeming By: Annie Temple (Oct 30 2009 - 6:47pm)
  • Annie Temple wrote:I'm By: remind (Oct 30 2009 - 2:11pm)
  • I'm confused.  You need two By: Annie Temple (Oct 30 2009 - 12:39pm)
  • remind wrote: Don't see an By: susan davis (Oct 30 2009 - 12:25pm)
  • Don't see an impasse at all, By: remind (Oct 30 2009 - 11:58am)
  • Bacchus, please don't tell By: Michelle (Oct 30 2009 - 6:58am)
  • Info, when I read the By: remind (Oct 30 2009 - 12:46am)
  • Martin-Fuck off Info-If a By: Bacchus (Oct 29 2009 - 11:45pm)
  • Bacchus wrote: Isn't this By: Infosaturated (Oct 29 2009 - 12:26am)
  • You might want to consult a By: martin dufresne (Oct 28 2009 - 10:54pm)
  • answer resides in this By: remind (Oct 28 2009 - 10:49pm)
  • Isn't this topic already in By: Bacchus (Oct 28 2009 - 10:19pm)
  • The Netherlands talks big on By: Infosaturated (Oct 28 2009 - 3:56pm)