susan davis
rabble-rouser
Member: 18114
Joined: Aug 1 2009

no? i can see clearly that some of us are offended and have provided numerous reasons why which you choose to ignore. you seem completely complacent about hharming us with your words. we have a right to stand up for ourselves and to confront you on your behaviour.

you are even trying to diminish our voices as if we are not the ones to be worried about and only the abusd and trafiicked or street level wrkers voices are valid. as if we are some how "priveldged" and ourisde of the issues.

we are sex workers, we are affected by your disregard for our choosen language, and we are completely entrenched in finding ways to support trafficked and abused people in the sex industry.

once again, please.....lay out your plan....how exactly will you decrim workers yet criminalize men? although it seems clearer and clearer to me that you do not even support the swedish model. you support full criminalization and eradication of our industry and us.

to hell with the human rights charter, exploited and trafficked people are our only concern. sex workers who choose this work get what they deserve and hopefully we will all be killed in what is inherently violent work.

am i understnading you correctly remind?


At the UN, Dutch try to defend abject failure of liberalization of prostitution laws By: Infosaturated (63 replies) October 28, 2009 - 3:54pm
  • fortunate wrote:  But I can By: Infosaturated (Nov 3 2009 - 11:00pm)
  • Infosaturated By: fortunate (Nov 3 2009 - 10:46pm)
  • martin dufresne By: fortunate (Nov 3 2009 - 10:39pm)
  • "(How long can we keep By: remind (Nov 3 2009 - 4:56pm)
  • ...realistically you first By: martin dufresne (Nov 3 2009 - 10:41am)
  • fortunate wrote: The By: Infosaturated (Nov 3 2009 - 3:54am)
  • remind wrote: what sex By: fortunate (Nov 3 2009 - 2:40am)
  • I don't want to create yet By: martin dufresne (Nov 3 2009 - 1:12am)
  • susan davis By: Infosaturated (Nov 1 2009 - 1:35pm)
  • Infosaturated wrote: To get By: susan davis (Nov 1 2009 - 1:09pm)
  • Annie Temple wrote: I do not By: susan davis (Nov 1 2009 - 1:08pm)
  • To get back to the point, By: Infosaturated (Nov 1 2009 - 1:03pm)
  • I do not feel I have to By: Annie Temple (Nov 1 2009 - 12:24pm)
  • so true babe!! By: susan davis (Oct 31 2009 - 8:56pm)
  • susan davis wrote: excuse By: fortunate (Oct 31 2009 - 7:02pm)
  • Links? By: remind (Oct 31 2009 - 4:23pm)
  • fortunate, ingrid......? By: susan davis (Oct 31 2009 - 4:11pm)
  • what sex workers who engage By: remind (Oct 31 2009 - 4:05pm)
  • excuse me, other sex workers By: susan davis (Oct 31 2009 - 1:23pm)
  • Trisha Baptie, jmartin, By: remind (Oct 31 2009 - 1:06pm)
  • 3 or 4? once again....i have By: susan davis (Oct 31 2009 - 11:53am)
  • Quote:Silencing people by By: remind (Oct 30 2009 - 7:17pm)
  • Silencing people by deeming By: Annie Temple (Oct 30 2009 - 6:47pm)
  • Annie Temple wrote:I'm By: remind (Oct 30 2009 - 2:11pm)
  • I'm confused.  You need two By: Annie Temple (Oct 30 2009 - 12:39pm)
  • remind wrote: Don't see an By: susan davis (Oct 30 2009 - 12:25pm)
  • Don't see an impasse at all, By: remind (Oct 30 2009 - 11:58am)
  • Bacchus, please don't tell By: Michelle (Oct 30 2009 - 6:58am)
  • Info, when I read the By: remind (Oct 30 2009 - 12:46am)
  • Martin-Fuck off Info-If a By: Bacchus (Oct 29 2009 - 11:45pm)
  • Bacchus wrote: Isn't this By: Infosaturated (Oct 29 2009 - 12:26am)
  • You might want to consult a By: martin dufresne (Oct 28 2009 - 10:54pm)
  • answer resides in this By: remind (Oct 28 2009 - 10:49pm)
  • Isn't this topic already in By: Bacchus (Oct 28 2009 - 10:19pm)
  • The Netherlands talks big on By: Infosaturated (Oct 28 2009 - 3:56pm)