babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.
It is interesting. Not just the learning part, but trying to squeeze the most production out of the process as one can. There's a thousand little tricks, and the learning should never stop. Most of that pressure is self inflicted. However, the pressure I feel when I'm moving the coils around with the crane is something different. An accident there won't leave you with a black finger nail. You can kill someone. That's the kind of task where fear is an interesting companion. Of course, you don't want fear to overwhelm you so you can't do the job-- which isn't dangerous at all if you do everything the way it's supposed to be done. But on the other hand, you want to keep that fear somewhere in the back of your mind so respect for what you're dealing with is maintained.
That's the kind of job I could never do, Tommy, bcause I'm easily distracted. I made the mistake of choosing the technical program in high school, because, as it turns out, I simply didn't have the aptitude for technical things. Once I blundered my way to the end of high school, I went and graduated from two arts colleges, two universities, and none of these had anything whatsoever to do with technology.
Years ago, when I was more snide, on other message boards, I used a tag line that read "Philosophy is a field of study designed to keep the right people away from sharp objects and moving machinery."
I'm not Joe handy guy either, compared to many of my co-workers. But, all it takes is a little focus. For example, when using a skill saw at home, I make sure my work area isn't cluttered, I make sure the blade depth is set right, and I think the cut through before I do it, conscious of where my hands will be and where the cord will be in relation to the blade. Same with moving coils of steel around. You think it through, look for potential problems first. Most accidents are the result of several small things going wrong. You eleminate all the ones you can, and the ones you miss probably won't have a catastrophic impact.
That's why someone once observed that "luck" is the residue of good planning.
Speaking of which, I've promised to construct a light box for Rebecca West, and I should probably do that today-- or at least get started.
Years ago, when I was more snide, on other message boards, I used a tag line that read "Philosophy is a field of study designed to keep the right people away from sharp objects and moving machinery."
Excellent discussion guys, really enjoyed it, keep us informed boomboom what the disks are all about.
Tommy_Paine wrote:
I read the thread on jets in space last night, and was really depressed because I know I had good comprehension of cosmology at one time, but it just seemed too heavy for my brain to lift last night.
That is funny you should say that, I started to read it, and felt the same way, so I moved along, but kept thinking about it in the background, and of a sudden, it all started clicking and I went "hey", and went back to the thread and read it, and the majority of the linked info.
And yep, sure enough, it all meant that relativity exists in the micro and macro of this light speed.
I'm hoping I can download the disks into both my computers - my desktop is a generic 2003 WinXP with an 80GB hard drive/1.5GB RAM, which I use every morning; my laptop is a 2008 Dell Inspiron 1525 with the latest version of Windoze, a big hard drive, lots of RAM, which I use every evening and when I travel. I'm wondering if manufacturers prevent downloads of their (purchased) material on more than one computer? The package should arrive in a few days.
(ps: please don't harass me for using Windoze - it came installed on both computers at the time of purchase)
Received the Brain Exercises CD today. The cover is all French, but the CD offers a choice between English and French, as does the handbook. It can only be installed on one computer; a license for a second computer is just $20.00. I guess I'll install it just on my laptop, as the laptop follows me everywhere I go.
In a nutshell, what Karim showed was that each time a memory is used, it has to be restored as a new memory in order to be accessible later. The old memory is either not there or is inaccessible. In short, your memory about something is only as good as your last memory about it. Joseph LeDoux
I am not as old as you are Boom Boom, but I have a similar problem that if I do not use it, I tend to loose it.
Quote:
Psychological mindednessPsychological Mindedness (PM) is a concept which refers to an individual's capacity for self-examination, self-observation, introspection and personal insight.[citation needed] It also includes an ability to recognize and see the links between current problems within self and with others, and the ability to insight one's past particularly for its impact on present attitudes and functioning. Psychologically minded people have average and above average intelligence and generally have some insight into their problems even before they enter therapy. Psychological mindedness is distinct from intellectualizations and obsessional rumination about one's inner problems. The latter is of no help in psychotherapy, but it is a sign of resistance.
Since we can be creatures of habit, it seems to me that neurological pathways are highways so to speak, and not traveling these roads, names of towns can slip our mind. "Waking up by traveling similar journeys" do tend to re-ignited those same neurological pathways. Having a strokes and damaging areas of the brain means that in order to ignite processes in our body expressions means to try and ignited those same pathways that were used.
By correspondence, we see correlations to our own lives. Looking at something and orientating the mind to see angles of something, is to me much like looking deep within the functioning of society to see what lies at the "bedrock or infrastructure" of the supporting objects of perception.
This is where something vaguely familiar eggs the conscious mind to look harder into the reservoir of our own histories. Brings those memories back to the surface.
I correspond quite a bit with friends on Facebook, and I'm finding that my memory is actually not as bad as I feared, especially my long term memory. Short-term memory is a bit more iffy. These cognitive brain exercises - and they suggest on the CD doing them three times minimun per week, half hour each time - I think are going to be interesting.
Having attended a recent seminar, I can attest that Anaka is very good. Some of his exercises, e.g., relate to getting communication between the different hemispheres of the brain going. (Juggling is one way.) But it is his infectious enthusiasm that is, perhaps, most memorable. For those interested in brain exercises, his presentations and books are great resources.
When I do the job I've been doing for the past month or so, where the problems are all solved and the only skills required of me are to physically move the parts, I have felt rather stupid. Very stupid. Slow. In fact, I was in some important problem solving yesterday afternoon, and Rebecca West had to step in and rescue me a couple times as my head swam.
Harry Braverman wrote about the deskilling associated with many jobs under current capitalism. I don't know if this relates to your above remarks but, it sounds like it does and, if it does then I would suggest having a look at Braverman's famous book.
Psychology professor Karim Nader is helping sufferers of post-traumatic stress disorder lessen debilitating symptoms—and in some cases, regain a normal life.Owen Egan See also: The Trauma Tamer
Karim Nader: There are a lot of implications. All psychopathological disorders, such as PTSD, epilepsy, obsessive compulsive disorders, or addiction—all these things have to do with your brain getting rewired in a way that is malfunctioning. Theoretically, we may be able to treat a lot of these psychopathologies. If you could block the re-storage of the circuit that causes the obsessive compulsion, then you might be able to reset a person to a level where they aren’t so obsessive. Or perhaps you can reset the circuit that has undergone epilepsy repeatedly so that you can increase the threshold for seizures. And there is some killer data showing that it’s possible to block the reconsolidation of drug cravings.
The other reason why I think it is so striking is that it is so contrary to what has been the accepted view of memory for so long in the mainstream. My research caused everybody in the field to stop, turn around and go, “Whoa, where’d that come from?” Nobody’s really working on this issue, and the only reason I came up with this is because I wasn’t trained in memory. [Nader was originally researching fear.] It really caused a fundamental reconceptualization of a very basic and dogmatic field in neuroscience, which is very exciting. It is the first time in 100 years that people are starting to come up with new models of memory at the physiological level.
For certain when composing articles in blogging format your trying to build off of previous information. You gather information so providing links is a way, much like connecting neurons to what was written before. Doing search functions for what is relevant to a topic in Google, or as a mean to use these search functions to help memory point to correlations.
Betrayal of Images" by Rene Magritte. 1929 painting on which is written "This is not a Pipe"
Looking at things from different angles is much like an artist who grabs onto an idea and furnishes us with a expose' into the idea of attention with further presentations visually. It is about seeing the idea manifest toward some kind of reality that is dare to say abstract in it's extrapolations, much as math is used to describe an aspect of nature.
Salvador Dalí (Spanish, 1904-1989). Crucifixion (Corpus Hypercubicus), 1953–54. Oil on canvas. 77 x 49 in. (195.6 x 124.5 cm). Gift of the Chester Dale Collection, 1955 (55.5). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.
So in a way, while we seem to see true representations "about the fundamental ideas" these manifest toward physical manifestation. These ideas "are covered by abstractions." Much like experience in our daily lives. Sorting through the memory is like sorting through the experience. Recall then becomes something of a challenge when we seek to better understand how we have become who are.
Waking up means to become aware at what resides at the basis of our experiences in society, and how these have manifested in our daily dealings within that society.
As simple as possible then in mathematical interpretation. You see?
OMG, you know Gary, nbeltov?What a blast from the past.
Having attended a recent seminar, I can attest that Anaka is very good. Some of his exercises, e.g., relate to getting communication between the different hemispheres of the brain going. (Juggling is one way.) But it is his infectious enthusiasm that is, perhaps, most memorable. For those interested in brain exercises, his presentations and books are great resources.
Interesting, Gary's and my paths have intersected a few times over the last 20 years, or so....
This is an amazing thread, thanks for starting it boom boom....
I can't stand Escher, personally - I find his stuff too tacky, technical, impersonal, etc....
Spending a little time looking into science and art, Dali rose to the occasion in my view in terms of Geometry and the tesseract.
Quote:
In geometry, the tesseract, or hypercube, is a regular convex polychoron with eight cubical cells. It can be thought of as a 4-dimensional analogue of the cube. Roughly speaking, the tesseract is to the cube as the cube is to the square.
Generalizations of the cube to dimensions greater than three are called hypercubes or measure polytopes. This article focuses on the 4D hypercube, the tesseract.
He had a "religious epiphany" moving toward dimensional perspective, and related it too, moving perception toward geometry, as if "other worldly." Many understand his private life not to be so blessed with such religiosity?:)
Quote:
Penrose's Influence on EscherDuring the later half of the 1950’s, Maurits Cornelius Escher received a letter from Lionel and Roger Penrose. This letter consisted of a report by the father and son team that focused on impossible figures. By this time, Escher had begun exploring impossible worlds. He had recently produced the lithograph Belvedere based on the “rib-cube,” an impossible cuboid named by Escher (Teuber 161). However, the letter by the Penroses, which would later appear in the British Journal of Psychology, enlightened Escher to two new impossible objects; the Penrose triangle and the Penrose stairs. With these figures, Escher went on to create further impossible worlds that break the laws of three-dimensional space, mystify one’s mind, and give a window to the artist heart.See:Penroses Influence on Escher
IN this way, I felt there was a kinship toward artist expression moving minds in science toward an malleable experience in terms of "using the brain and twisting it" one might say.
This is a perspective I formed around how we view projective geometry in terms of it leading perspective in that artistic sense.
The NeuroActive Program CD isn't easy - it amounts to IQ testing for 20 minutes every second day (although my first session took an hour to get used to the program). There were four tasks - math was one, and the easiest. The others were identifying different shapes, memorizing constellations, and skill tests involving shopping at a store. It's very challenging, and you really need to be fully awake to succeed at the tests. I registered as a person with a post-graduate university degree, although that was 30 years ago! I think if I registered at a lower level, it might have been an easier set-up. But, perhaps the tests are adjusted according to one's results on these tests as one proceeds through them. It's quite a large disk - with 14,500+ mb of space required (14 GB?). I liked doing all the tests except memorizing the constellations - that was bloody difficult, and I had to do that part of the test four times before I completed it. I'm sure the program thinks I'm an idiot.
Albert (who is married) is looking at Bertha who is looking at Callum (who is unmarried).
Question: Is a married person looking at an unmarried person?
Answer: (a) Yes; (b) No; or (c) Impossible to tell from information given.
Apparently, 80% of people get this one wrong.
Guess I should post the answer, too, which is (a) Yes. If Bertha is married, then it's Bertha looking Callum. If Bertha is unmarried, then it's Albert looking at Bertha. Either way, a married person is looking at an unmarried person.
Aside from slowing my year-old laptop computer down a bit because it's such a massive program, I am quite pleased with the NeuroActive CD. It has a ton of brain exercises that one can do anytime, besides the regular program designed to be done every two days. All these exercises take quite a bit of concentration, and some memorization, as well. It's such a large program, however, that I've decided not to install it on my old desktop computer, which is already quite slow.
Twenty minutes every second day is the suggested schedule. There are music and spoken words sections as well, so headphones are a good idea unless your computer has good speakers.
It is interesting. Not just the learning part, but trying to squeeze the most production out of the process as one can. There's a thousand little tricks, and the learning should never stop. Most of that pressure is self inflicted. However, the pressure I feel when I'm moving the coils around with the crane is something different. An accident there won't leave you with a black finger nail. You can kill someone. That's the kind of task where fear is an interesting companion. Of course, you don't want fear to overwhelm you so you can't do the job-- which isn't dangerous at all if you do everything the way it's supposed to be done. But on the other hand, you want to keep that fear somewhere in the back of your mind so respect for what you're dealing with is maintained.
That's the kind of job I could never do, Tommy, bcause I'm easily distracted. I made the mistake of choosing the technical program in high school, because, as it turns out, I simply didn't have the aptitude for technical things. Once I blundered my way to the end of high school, I went and graduated from two arts colleges, two universities, and none of these had anything whatsoever to do with technology.
He he.
Years ago, when I was more snide, on other message boards, I used a tag line that read "Philosophy is a field of study designed to keep the right people away from sharp objects and moving machinery."
I'm not Joe handy guy either, compared to many of my co-workers. But, all it takes is a little focus. For example, when using a skill saw at home, I make sure my work area isn't cluttered, I make sure the blade depth is set right, and I think the cut through before I do it, conscious of where my hands will be and where the cord will be in relation to the blade. Same with moving coils of steel around. You think it through, look for potential problems first. Most accidents are the result of several small things going wrong. You eleminate all the ones you can, and the ones you miss probably won't have a catastrophic impact.
That's why someone once observed that "luck" is the residue of good planning.
Speaking of which, I've promised to construct a light box for Rebecca West, and I should probably do that today-- or at least get started.
Excellent discussion guys, really enjoyed it, keep us informed boomboom what the disks are all about.
That is funny you should say that, I started to read it, and felt the same way, so I moved along, but kept thinking about it in the background, and of a sudden, it all started clicking and I went "hey", and went back to the thread and read it, and the majority of the linked info.
And yep, sure enough, it all meant that relativity exists in the micro and macro of this light speed.
Very simply put of course.
Loved that whole read, wonderfully refreshing.
I'm hoping I can download the disks into both my computers - my desktop is a generic 2003 WinXP with an 80GB hard drive/1.5GB RAM, which I use every morning; my laptop is a 2008 Dell Inspiron 1525 with the latest version of Windoze, a big hard drive, lots of RAM, which I use every evening and when I travel. I'm wondering if manufacturers prevent downloads of their (purchased) material on more than one computer? The package should arrive in a few days.
(ps: please don't harass me for using Windoze - it came installed on both computers at the time of purchase)
just register your computers as a network, in the soft ware registration prompt
Received the Brain Exercises CD today. The cover is all French, but the CD offers a choice between English and French, as does the handbook. It can only be installed on one computer; a license for a second computer is just $20.00. I guess I'll install it just on my laptop, as the laptop follows me everywhere I go.
I correspond quite a bit with friends on Facebook, and I'm finding that my memory is actually not as bad as I feared, especially my long term memory. Short-term memory is a bit more iffy. These cognitive brain exercises - and they suggest on the CD doing them three times minimun per week, half hour each time - I think are going to be interesting.
Having attended a recent seminar, I can attest that Anaka is very good. Some of his exercises, e.g., relate to getting communication between the different hemispheres of the brain going. (Juggling is one way.) But it is his infectious enthusiasm that is, perhaps, most memorable. For those interested in brain exercises, his presentations and books are great resources.
Harry Braverman wrote about the deskilling associated with many jobs under current capitalism. I don't know if this relates to your above remarks but, it sounds like it does and, if it does then I would suggest having a look at Braverman's famous book.
Harry Braverman: Labour and Monopoly Capital
The Spotless Mind
For certain when composing articles in blogging format your trying to build off of previous information. You gather information so providing links is a way, much like connecting neurons to what was written before. Doing search functions for what is relevant to a topic in Google, or as a mean to use these search functions to help memory point to correlations.
Betrayal of Images" by Rene Magritte. 1929 painting on which is written "This is not a Pipe"
Looking at things from different angles is much like an artist who grabs onto an idea and furnishes us with a expose' into the idea of attention with further presentations visually. It is about seeing the idea manifest toward some kind of reality that is dare to say abstract in it's extrapolations, much as math is used to describe an aspect of nature.
Salvador Dalí (Spanish, 1904-1989). Crucifixion (Corpus Hypercubicus), 1953–54. Oil on canvas. 77 x 49 in. (195.6 x 124.5 cm). Gift of the Chester Dale Collection, 1955 (55.5). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.
© Salvador Dalí, Gala-Salvador Dalí Foundation / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New YorkSo in a way, while we seem to see true representations "about the fundamental ideas" these manifest toward physical manifestation. These ideas "are covered by abstractions." Much like experience in our daily lives. Sorting through the memory is like sorting through the experience. Recall then becomes something of a challenge when we seek to better understand how we have become who are.
Waking up means to become aware at what resides at the basis of our experiences in society, and how these have manifested in our daily dealings within that society.
As simple as possible then in mathematical interpretation. You see?
I've been a huge fan of Dali's paintings most of my life.
Yes mine too. Another of course is Escher.
I can't stand Escher, personally - I find his stuff too tacky, techical, impersonal, etc.... On the other hand, the Surrealists really appeal to me.
Interesting, Gary's and my paths have intersected a few times over the last 20 years, or so....
This is an amazing thread, thanks for starting it boom boom....
The NeuroActive Program CD isn't easy - it amounts to IQ testing for 20 minutes every second day (although my first session took an hour to get used to the program). There were four tasks - math was one, and the easiest. The others were identifying different shapes, memorizing constellations, and skill tests involving shopping at a store. It's very challenging, and you really need to be fully awake to succeed at the tests. I registered as a person with a post-graduate university degree, although that was 30 years ago! I think if I registered at a lower level, it might have been an easier set-up. But, perhaps the tests are adjusted according to one's results on these tests as one proceeds through them. It's quite a large disk - with 14,500+ mb of space required (14 GB?). I liked doing all the tests except memorizing the constellations - that was bloody difficult, and I had to do that part of the test four times before I completed it. I'm sure the program thinks I'm an idiot.
Check this out:
http://www.braingym.org
I came across one today.
Albert (who is married) is looking at Bertha who is looking at Callum (who is unmarried).
Question: Is a married person looking at an unmarried person?
Answer: (a) Yes; (b) No; or (c) Impossible to tell from information given.
Apparently, 80% of people get this one wrong.
Ha! Good one, G. Pie. That's a good puzzle.
Guess I should post the answer, too, which is (a) Yes. If Bertha is married, then it's Bertha looking Callum. If Bertha is unmarried, then it's Albert looking at Bertha. Either way, a married person is looking at an unmarried person.
Oh boo! I'm in there with the 80 percent.
And then there's always this little beauty: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_hall_problem
Aside from slowing my year-old laptop computer down a bit because it's such a massive program, I am quite pleased with the NeuroActive CD. It has a ton of brain exercises that one can do anytime, besides the regular program designed to be done every two days. All these exercises take quite a bit of concentration, and some memorization, as well. It's such a large program, however, that I've decided not to install it on my old desktop computer, which is already quite slow.
How many hours does it take to complete usually did it say boom boom?
Twenty minutes every second day is the suggested schedule. There are music and spoken words sections as well, so headphones are a good idea unless your computer has good speakers.
Gammagard Hope for Alzheimer's sufferers