V. Jara
rabble-rouser
Member: 10193
Joined: May 12 2005

All the smart bets are against the Liberals at this point. They are the only party sagging in the polls and the last set of byelections showed their support is soft. As such, these are the NDP's best bets for pickups if an election were held today:

Gatineau

St. John's-Mount Pearl

South Shore - St Margaret's

Palliser

Parkdale-High Park

Surrey North

----

Other ridings where I would drop some change in on the chance that things could go well:

Nunavut

Oshawa

Edmonton East

Beaches East York

Newton North Delta (assuming a nominated candidate)

----

The NDP will be in a fight to the death in:

Vancouver Island North

Edmonton-Strathcona

Welland

Sudbury

Saskatoon - Rosetown - Biggar

Burnaby - Douglas (perennial close shaves for the NDP here, the riding association deserves the Victoria Cross Tongue out)

---

The NDP will need to carefully watch its back in:

Sault Ste. Marie

Outremont

Western Artic

---

If Jack didn't make a carefully planned stop in each of these ridings over the course of a campaign held today, I would be shocked. In fact, I think these ridings are likely to see a lot more of Jack Layton and other Dippers in the next little while. Some of them have already received a fair number of visits.

And the NDP now has an economic issue to hang the Conservatives in Saskatchewan on too. The NDP MUST develop a policy on the federal deficit (btw, the provincial ones are looking much more serious) or they are going to get road pizza-ed!


So...why wasn't Hochelaga closer? By: Ken Burch (96 replies) November 11, 2009 - 5:41pm
  • flight from kamakura By: adma (Nov 13 2009 - 9:45pm)
  • Thanks ffk. I think the NPD By: V. Jara (Nov 13 2009 - 8:36pm)
  • I think those people will be By: ottawaobserver (Nov 13 2009 - 7:30pm)
  • That's a good on the ground By: Stockholm (Nov 13 2009 - 6:49pm)
  • a few things: 1. hochelaga By: flight from kamakura (Nov 13 2009 - 5:00pm)
  • I think the simple reason By: genstrike (Nov 13 2009 - 3:13pm)
  • ... it's more than a By: ottawaobserver (Nov 13 2009 - 8:47am)
  • Maybe if one were to By: adma (Nov 13 2009 - 8:29am)
  • Another thing that convinces By: V. Jara (Nov 13 2009 - 2:14am)
  • BTW, it's so fantastic that By: ottawaobserver (Nov 13 2009 - 1:57am)
  • Probably the one union with By: ottawaobserver (Nov 13 2009 - 1:54am)
  • That being said Wilf, it was By: V. Jara (Nov 13 2009 - 1:16am)
  • ottawaobserver wrote:Give By: Wilf Day (Nov 13 2009 - 12:12am)
  • V.Jara, your points #1 and By: ottawaobserver (Nov 12 2009 - 6:27pm)
  • Most people haven't tried to By: V. Jara (Nov 12 2009 - 6:16pm)
  • The NDP vote in Hochelaga By: Stockholm (Nov 12 2009 - 4:19pm)
  • ottawaobserver wrote: I By: Debater (Nov 12 2009 - 3:39pm)
  •  interesting reading OO, By: remind (Nov 12 2009 - 1:54pm)
  • The answer to the thread By: madmax (Nov 12 2009 - 1:08pm)
  • KenS wrote: And the Liberals By: bekayne (Nov 12 2009 - 12:27pm)
  • Who represents anglophone By: autoworker (Nov 12 2009 - 11:02am)
  • Debater wrote: Ken Burch By: ottawaobserver (Nov 12 2009 - 8:43am)
  • Debater wrote:And the By: KenS (Nov 12 2009 - 8:07am)
  • adma wrote:...to say "even By: KenS (Nov 12 2009 - 7:39am)
  • Considering that Outremont By: adma (Nov 12 2009 - 7:22am)
  • Ken Burch wrote: Then again, By: Debater (Nov 12 2009 - 4:29am)
  • Then again, even fewer are By: Ken Burch (Nov 12 2009 - 2:29am)
  • Ken Burch wrote: What By: Debater (Nov 12 2009 - 1:29am)
  •  I wonder what the NDP plan By: NorthReport (Nov 12 2009 - 12:27am)
  • Ken, I don't know if that's By: ottawaobserver (Nov 11 2009 - 11:43pm)
  • Is the assumption that By: Ken Burch (Nov 11 2009 - 10:31pm)
  • Compare the 2000 election By: David Young (Nov 11 2009 - 8:53pm)
  • To me the key By: ottawaobserver (Nov 11 2009 - 6:27pm)
  • But not Layton. Jack said he By: NorthReport (Nov 11 2009 - 6:15pm)
  • The future is a longer By: Sean in Ottawa (Nov 11 2009 - 6:06pm)