remind
\,,/ rabble-rouser-l33t \,,/
Member: 7289
Joined: Jun 25 2004

Wow...what a Liberal shilling that was....."who will stop Harper"....narrowing things down to "the NDP only wants to replace the Liberals", yap yap, yap..

 

obliquely admitting the NDP has some good things going on, but their vision is narrow....as they are apparently  fixated on  "only want to  replace the Liberals",  while stating Jack was running to be Prime Minister...which means replacing Harper too...is discontinuity at best..

 

so what if the NDP want to replace the Liberals? That is the whole point in Canadian politics to replace that which is fucking over  Canadians, eh!

making it sound as if it is a crime is TFF....and indeed I hope/pray/long for the day when they do replace the Liberals

 

the Liberals need to be replaced, as much as Harper needs to be gone too, the Liberals are no saviours of Canada... no more than Harper is.


NDP / Dobbin: "Who will stop Stephen Harper?" By: hsfreethinkers (57 replies) December 3, 2009 - 8:57am
  • Sunday Hat wrote: 2) I think By: KenS (Dec 8 2009 - 4:07pm)
  • Exactly. Too many alleged By: Scott Piatkowski (Dec 8 2009 - 3:39pm)
  • As someone who actually By: Sunday Hat (Dec 8 2009 - 3:25pm)
  • The BC NDP did present a By: kropotkin1951 (Dec 7 2009 - 3:02pm)
  • A "green economy and a real By: George Victor (Dec 7 2009 - 10:30am)
  • I agree with what you say By: KenS (Dec 7 2009 - 8:29am)
  • Dobbin's piece is By: West Coast Lefty (Dec 7 2009 - 3:19am)
  • Murray Dobbin is a Liberal? By: Frustrated Mess (Dec 6 2009 - 11:57am)
  • To paraphrase that old By: George Victor (Dec 6 2009 - 11:54am)
  • kropotkin1951 wrote:I think By: Fidel (Dec 4 2009 - 3:28pm)
  • LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO By: remind (Dec 4 2009 - 1:10pm)
  • KenS wrote: Like most people By: hsfreethinkers (Dec 4 2009 - 1:00pm)
  • I think that if the federal By: kropotkin1951 (Dec 4 2009 - 12:36pm)
  • I didnt see or forgot what By: KenS (Dec 4 2009 - 12:22pm)
  • Scott Piatkowski wrote:. By: remind (Dec 4 2009 - 12:10pm)
  • Polunatic2 wrote:I think By: KenS (Dec 4 2009 - 10:46am)
  • I would not call it a By: KenS (Dec 4 2009 - 10:41am)
  • I think what they're trying By: Polunatic2 (Dec 4 2009 - 10:36am)
  • KenS wrote: To the degree By: hsfreethinkers (Dec 4 2009 - 10:09am)
  • hsfreethinkers wrote:I think By: KenS (Dec 4 2009 - 8:20am)
  • The problem with the By: Fidel (Dec 4 2009 - 6:56am)
  • No, I'm saying that the NDP By: Scott Piatkowski (Dec 3 2009 - 11:50pm)
  • Scott Piatkowski wrote: It's By: hsfreethinkers (Dec 3 2009 - 11:38pm)
  • No, you're missing the By: Scott Piatkowski (Dec 3 2009 - 11:25pm)
  • Exactly By: remind (Dec 3 2009 - 11:19pm)
  • I think a lot of you are By: hsfreethinkers (Dec 3 2009 - 11:22pm)
  • I really can't stand it when By: Scott Piatkowski (Dec 3 2009 - 10:22pm)
  • There is a nugget about By: janfromthebruce (Dec 3 2009 - 2:46pm)
  • I agree. Just pointing out By: KenS (Dec 3 2009 - 1:01pm)
  • It is what it is Ken... By: remind (Dec 3 2009 - 12:57pm)
  • But with this strategy the By: hsfreethinkers (Dec 3 2009 - 12:39pm)
  • I don't think its necessary By: KenS (Dec 3 2009 - 11:57am)
  • Wow...what a Liberal By: remind (Dec 3 2009 - 10:52am)
  • There is a nice irony in By: KenS (Dec 3 2009 - 9:39am)
  • I agree that the NDP lacks a By: KenS (Dec 3 2009 - 9:20am)