Sask. cuts funding to First Nations University By: al-Qa'bong (33 replies) February 4, 2010 - 11:58am
- I really cannot believe what By: homanchoochoo (Sep 13 2010 - 7:12am)
- FNUC lays off By: al-Qa'bong (Apr 7 2010 - 10:15pm)
- remind wrote: An interesting By: kropotkin1951 (Feb 10 2010 - 12:21pm)
- An interesting aside is that By: remind (Feb 10 2010 - 11:09am)
- I don't think the provincial By: Timebandit (Feb 9 2010 - 4:31pm)
- Timebandit wrote: Um. I By: Sean in Ottawa (Feb 9 2010 - 2:05pm)
- Quote:In BC we would have to By: remind (Feb 9 2010 - 11:19am)
- I listened to the head to By: kropotkin1951 (Feb 9 2010 - 11:03am)
- It appears the NDP have By: japagaijin (Feb 8 2010 - 9:36pm)
- Thank you Timebandit. Well By: japagaijin (Feb 8 2010 - 9:22pm)
- The federal government has By: Bacchus (Feb 8 2010 - 9:22pm)
- Um. I think you need to By: Timebandit (Feb 8 2010 - 5:46pm)
- So are there no other levers By: Sean in Ottawa (Feb 8 2010 - 5:09pm)
- Given the complete absence By: Timebandit (Feb 8 2010 - 3:29pm)
- Malcolm wrote: There was a By: kropotkin1951 (Feb 8 2010 - 2:55pm)
- There was a group within the By: Malcolm (Feb 8 2010 - 2:21pm)
- It's not about ability, it's By: Timebandit (Feb 8 2010 - 2:17pm)
- I'm not saying I don't By: japagaijin (Feb 8 2010 - 2:04pm)
- you either believe in FN's By: kropotkin1951 (Feb 8 2010 - 1:59pm)
- Okay, to get back on topic. By: japagaijin (Feb 8 2010 - 1:44pm)
- al-q This person likely By: kropotkin1951 (Feb 8 2010 - 1:22pm)
- Maybe that was the case at By: al-Qa'bong (Feb 8 2010 - 10:39am)
- It was made up of as many By: Ktown (Feb 8 2010 - 9:43am)
- Quote: How is that the By: al-Qa'bong (Feb 7 2010 - 11:47pm)
- So...what about the four By: japagaijin (Feb 7 2010 - 9:23pm)
- japagaijin wrote: I too By: kropotkin1951 (Feb 7 2010 - 11:48am)
- On another note, I don't By: japagaijin (Feb 6 2010 - 10:43am)
- I too would like By: japagaijin (Feb 6 2010 - 10:26am)
- kropotkin1951 wrote:Next you By: al-Qa'bong (Feb 5 2010 - 5:12pm)
- 4 former Progressive By: Ktown (Feb 5 2010 - 4:49pm)
- The Conservative Party of By: kropotkin1951 (Feb 5 2010 - 11:30am)
- kropotkin1951 wrote: I think By: Ktown (Feb 5 2010 - 1:04am)
- I think since there are By: kropotkin1951 (Feb 7 2010 - 11:41am)
The Conservative Party of Sask. became the Sask. Party because their MLA's were convicted of fraud. They did a name chance and now the Sask. Party has a clean slate. I was saying the university should do the same thing and rebrand themslves just like the corrupt Conservatives became the squeaky clean Sask. Party.
And yes a slim majority of the electorate that isn't disgusted by the game voted for the Sask. Party not a majority of the electorate. About a third of the eleigible voters actually voted for the Sask. Party. About 250,00 votes all told to win a provincial election with a majority government.
Next you will tell me how brilliant that asshole "free market" shill John Gormley is.