Petty and pointless censorship by rabble.ca By: M. Spector (48 replies) February 17, 2010 - 6:07pmWell funny thing, I actually By: GOD (Feb 19 2010 - 9:37am) Oldgoat wrote: God knows By: Caissa (Feb 19 2010 - 9:26am) M. Spector wrote:
How does By: oldgoat (Feb 19 2010 - 9:21am) A little benefit of the By: Slumberjack (Feb 19 2010 - 9:20am) Can't buy that explanation By: RevolutionPlease (Feb 19 2010 - 3:00am) How does your theory account By: M. Spector (Feb 19 2010 - 2:28am) Exactly, spam deletions. By: Michelle (Feb 19 2010 - 12:32am) Delete the flagged comment? By: remind (Feb 18 2010 - 9:59pm) It's quite possible that By: Michelle (Feb 18 2010 - 8:56pm) i've never deleted a blog By: Gary Shaul (Feb 18 2010 - 8:49pm) OH! You know, I just By: Michelle (Feb 18 2010 - 8:01pm) I think that the original By: Michelle (Feb 18 2010 - 7:51pm) Other than getting rid of By: oldgoat (Feb 18 2010 - 6:41pm) Me, too. By: M. Spector (Feb 18 2010 - 6:22pm) I am opposed to it. By: remind (Feb 18 2010 - 5:18pm) As a blogger, I noticed that By: Gary Shaul (Feb 18 2010 - 4:59pm) Cornish pixies? By: Fidel (Feb 18 2010 - 4:11pm) Good question.
As for this By: M. Spector (Feb 18 2010 - 3:45pm) Why do bloggers here get to By: remind (Feb 18 2010 - 2:54pm) rabble isn't "privately By: Michelle (Feb 18 2010 - 1:17pm) Hi M. Spector. I'm not sure By: Paul D. Boin (Feb 18 2010 - 1:01pm) It doesn't make sense that By: Slumberjack (Feb 18 2010 - 7:20am) Wow, see the new ebblab even By: RevolutionPlease (Feb 18 2010 - 2:21am) I have no idea if the By: oldgoat (Feb 17 2010 - 11:03pm) Farmpunk wrote:
Is this the By: M. Spector (Feb 17 2010 - 10:25pm) Welcome back M.Spector hope By: Pogo (Feb 17 2010 - 10:21pm) Unionist wrote:
The removal By: Fidel (Feb 17 2010 - 9:49pm) Libel of whom? There is no By: Unionist (Feb 17 2010 - 9:36pm) Is it censorship if it's a By: jas (Feb 17 2010 - 9:31pm) The removal of your posts is By: Unionist (Feb 17 2010 - 8:37pm) Re: Petty and pointless censorship by rabble.ca By: Farmpunk (Feb 17 2010 - 8:34pm) Excellent post, M. Spector. By: Sven (Feb 17 2010 - 7:30pm) Probe: Olympic track didn't By: Fidel (Feb 17 2010 - 7:11pm) M. Spector wrote:
Just By: NoDifferencePartyPooper (Feb 17 2010 - 6:26pm) Just dropping by to let you By: M. Spector (Feb 17 2010 - 6:08pm)
- n/a By: Michelle (Mar 1 2010 - 3:35pm)
- That gas light. It's By: Snert (Mar 1 2010 - 3:13pm)
- Michelle, M. Spector didn't By: Catchfire (Mar 1 2010 - 3:05pm)
- n/a By: Michelle (Mar 1 2010 - 3:03pm)
- n/a By: Michelle (Mar 1 2010 - 2:59pm)
- Did you take a snap of the By: remind (Mar 1 2010 - 1:01pm)
- Hi again. At least two By: M. Spector (Mar 1 2010 - 12:23pm)
- Well I think modern hard By: Fidel (Feb 19 2010 - 4:10pm)
- Don't you mean his Cornish By: Caissa (Feb 19 2010 - 3:54pm)
- I still think it was By: Fidel (Feb 19 2010 - 3:53pm)
- oldgoat wrote: God knows By: M. Spector (Feb 19 2010 - 11:51am)
- Quote:How many of us scour By: remind (Feb 19 2010 - 11:20am)
- If this isn't proof of By: Slumberjack (Feb 19 2010 - 9:40am)
Frig, I just lost my whole post because I was logged in under another account to test out my theory that blog comments might be able to be deleted by the person who posted them, then logged into my regular account in another window, and it screwed up this window! :)
Anyhow. Here's the deal with blogs at rabble.
Bloggers are hosting their own blogs on rabble. Bloggers have the ability to delete posts as a result. (I'm not saying that this is what happened in this case, since Judy hosts highly critical comments about her postings at her personal blog site and here, and there are lots of critical posts in that thread anyhow.)
But bloggers can moderate their blog comments as they see fit, and according to their own standards. This means that they may have different standards than babble around when a post might get deleted. People might delete posts for a variety of reasons - if they're insulting, they don't consider them to be useful to the debate, abusive, whatever. And they may have different standards than you do when it comes to what constitutes abusive, insulting, etc.
They might also delete a comment upon request from the person commenting, or if the poster deletes the post except for one character, which one of our staff noticed in a blog posting recently and then deleted it for them. We have no idea what happened in this case because we don't have anything to go on beyond a claim that a couple of posts, from unnamed posters, were deleted. If the people whose posts were lost contact us, we'll look into it further.
But what it comes down to is this: if you want to make absolutely sure your post stays intact, post it on babble, where there is a pretty standard policy of not deleting posts unless they cross the bounds of legality or spam.
P.S. Just spoke with Judy - she didn't delete anyone's posts and neither has anyone on staff.