On Legitimate and Illegitimate Protest
Those who profess to favor freedom and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightening. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one, or it may be a physical one, and it may be both moral and physical, but it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.
Frederick Douglass, 1857
This page grows out of dialogue with many community members between the Vancouver Olympics in February and the Toronto G8/G20 in June. It needs saying.
I am writing this for friends who believe that direct action tactics - namely property damage - are either violent and/or 'overshadow' the messages of our movement. I have had so many of these conversations that clearly there is a will and a need to make these points public.
How you can help: Support the Toronto 900: Till every last one is free! Solidarity actions and statements of support are being called for by organizers. Also, you can send bail/legal support funds via paypal by clicking on the 'support us!' link at the bottom right of this page: http://g20.torontomobilize.org/
My pacifism can - must - coexist with your militancy if we are to acheive any of our goals
The thing is that my basic nature is to prefer to avoid physical confrontation. For my own spiritual reasons, as well as straight up fear of being hit on the head or penned in by police, I tend to feel in my gut the same way as many of these voices do who are unhappy when the smashing begins - scared, overwhelmed, afraid of the police response, and preferring for my own ethical reasons to be gentle in my actions - which is why i'm not there smashing shit up myself.
At the same time, speaking out of care for and friendships with many people who have thought through their choice of tactics and intentionally use direct action strategies as one set in a large and varied toolbox - I can say that in fact those members of our communities who choose to use these strategies are some of the least violent and most responsible, loving people I know in how they choose to live their lives.
If I were trapped on a desert island a la Lord of the Flies, and had to figure out how to survive collectively, share our food and set up a new society, these are the folks I'd want there with me.
They're the ones with the concrete skills in collective decision making and the respect for life that would make me feel the most cared for and safe.
They're the ones who would make sure no one else gobbled up my share of the food, and the ones who would make sure everyone else had a safe place to sleep before they hit the sack themelves, and who would be the first and most willing to take their turn on watch.
They're the ones least likely to put pig heads on sticks and kill each other with conch shells.
I can't speak for the actions of everyone out on the streets, but if the people I know personally are any example, this is not 'wanton destruction' but comes out of a long, deep, intelligent and educated commitment to larger global social justice movements.
If people here glorify the Zapatistas (which a lot of northern progressives tend to do), then how can we villify people who use the same tactics for the same purposes here?
I think these moments of crisis, and those who create them, help us reach each other in a more genuine way through the haze and bubble wrap of consumerism in which north americans are encouraged to live.
The police, the state, and the corporate media want to separate us into:
'legitimate' protestors: those thousands who walk in incredible numbers with passion and banners - who can be ignored and have absolutely no effect any longer, because the current dominant culture in media and government - i.e. government by elites for elites, and the rest of us can eat cake - no longer takes any notice of expressions of democratic will. Remember the enormous peaceful demonstrations in 2003 when the US stepped up bombing in Afghanistan? All over the world, we marched and sang in the hundreds of thousands as the bombs dropped, and it acheived not a thing.
And 'illegitimate' protestors: those who actually challenge the system, those who recognize that marches may - may - have worked in the 1960s but they no longer work today. In fact, I'm not sure they are what really brought about change in the 60s either - if you look at the civil rights movement, the black panthers, etc. in successful social change movements, there was always a more militant wing of the movement that helped make the 'peaceful' events have more weight and effect.
Basically the 'legitimate/illegitimate' labels work to separate us from one another, and the commercial media laps it right up.
Unity in Diversity means space for genuine diversity
The thing is we live in a world with so many different kinds of people in it... and I don't think my personal preference for slow gentle movement needs to overwrite other people's need for direct, militant resistance.
Do our discomforts with one another's choices about how to resist mean that we have to all resist in the same ways? Would we ever want to live in a world, or be part of a movement, in which there is one uniform party line that we all have to buy into (i.e. only one kind of resistance is allowed, only slow, gentle resistance... or only militant resistance)?
In a conflict with someone or something much, much more powerful... when people live their daily lives in fear... sometimes we may need to be free to scream and yell or be really really firm and not allow ourselves to get trampled because that is asserting freedom from the fear that people live with normally - the fear people live with when we all act like everything is fine. Particularly for the people whose livelihoods, lands, and cultures are on the line.
The quiet daily system of aggression is more frightening when people let it poison our bodies and spirits quietly and while acting nice then it is when people are free/liberated to speak the truth - the full truth- about systems of power - even if that means a few inanimate objects get destroyed.
For those who feel strengthened and liberated by speaking out and refusing to be afraid, I think power to them - it's not my way, and that's fine with them and fine with me.
At this point, while I have a personal (maybe spiritual, maybe self-preservation) discomfort with militancy, so long as it is against inanimate objects, I don't see these things (direct action vs. gentle protest) as in opposition - I see them as complimentary.
And I see them both as profoundly loving and profoundly hopeful.
My gentle approach acheives certain kinds of things, such as the sympathy of middle and upper middle class people who want change without 'plowing the ground' - and there are other things it simply can't do - and I recognize its limitations.
I depend on people with the stomach for more direct action to take those risks, and to push the neoliberal state to recognize that there is only so far the corporate elite can push the population.
There is only so far the corporate elite can steal from us, repress Indigenous peoples and continue to colonize land, destroy our planet and our ecosystems, erode all of our human and civil rights, take apart our social safety net, and repress or ignore us when we speak up.
There is only so far that inequality between the wealthy and the poor can go, before unrest becomes widespread, and this is an important message for governments and the corporate elite to hear. I remember how it felt to be part of an enormous demonstration against the war and then realize that our governments were going to go ahead and bomb anyway.
I remember the feeling of hopelessness and powerlessness watching unspeakably, unthinkably horrible things happen and knowing that no matter how many hundreds of thousands of us take to the streets, we would acheive a tiny blip in the corporate media world, and absolutely nothing in the world of international capital and colonial domination.
When you ignore us, and allow only ineffective marches in Green Zones to be 'legitimate', as you dismantle everything we care about and expand your destruction of our cultures, of civil society, and of the planet, yes, eventually more and more people will resist.
Those who choose direct action tactics are standing their ground and speaking the truth to power, at great personal cost. For taking a stand, I owe them both my honesty and my support.
I think the reason people don't see the value of direct action is because of media and official PR spin. I'm not suggesting that any of us are fools who suck up what's in the news, but rather that we don't have access to a lot of information - in the sense of what doesn't get heard, what doesn't get covered, what is downplayed or ignored... what daily regular violence is ignored.
Rather than turning the dominant opinion against the vulnerable people who take these risks to speak truth to power by destroying symbols - symbols! A cop car is not alive; it is a potent symbol - while people's faces, bodies, lands, and freedoms are being smashed... I prefer to use the conversations as opportunities to build mass movements. Don't let the media trick us into blaming each other.
The protesters in jail deserve kindness and support, whether we share their strategies or not. Let's get them out and be clear in our wholehearted support, and then when we've got them back in our communities and in our arms and around our dinner tables, and out of the arms of the state, then let's strengthen our ability to make space for and compliment each other's approaches - both our gentler approaches and our more assertive ones.
Support the Toronto 900: Till every last one is free! Solidarity actions and statements of support are being called for by organizers. Also, you can send bail/legal support funds via paypal by clicking on the 'support us!' link at the bottom right of this page: http://g20.torontomobilize.org/
Here in Vancouver, where I live, many people I care about were involved in a direct action in February against a corporate sponsor of the Olympics games - Hudson's Bay. After the fact, I heard a lot of pain, fear, and confusion from many around me who are struggling with a perceived rift in the global justice movement: a rift between those who want to protest using only gentle tactics such as marches, singing, and sit-ins, and those who want to protest by actively fighting back against the ever-growing police repression in our lives, and by destroying symbols of corporate domination and colonization such as the windows of massive corporations.
I heard from members of the community choir that I sang in at the demos, for instance, that the direct action tactics 'overshadowed' the message of what I'm going to call 'gentle' protestors.
In response, I can't help but note that, if those I know are any example, the people who used direct action strategies in Vancouver are very committed to social change, and spent countless hours organizing things including the direct action 'heart attack' march but also the tent city, the Women's March (Indigenous women in Vancouver's downtown eastside), and the general flag-waving puppeted facepainted large demonstrations.
The behind-the-scenes relationships can look very different - much more cooperative, organized, meaningful and respectful - than media portrayals or even the way events might look to people who just show up for a demo without coming to the meetings beforehand to find out what's planned and how and why. I find it divisive to separate out and demonize those 'bad' protestors from us 'good' protestors, when really we're all the same people doing different work on different days... particularly since the media and police want to make that distinction.
I wonder, given the history of agitation for social change, which always includes direct physical struggle of some sort or another, whether it's helping anyone to replicate that division of 'good' and 'bad' forms of protest against oppression
As my choir director noted, had the result in the mainstream media been better - for instance, had there been an actual discussion of the real issues in the mainstream media - then those who were so upset about how things turned out in Vancouver (people injured and in jail, protesters branded as thugs, media even less sympathetic) would have been cheering the physical tactics of the direct action folks as part of the reason for success. Anyone who attempted to protest the Olympics at all knows that mainstream perspectives had already decided that the protesters were just a bunch of grumps and killjoys.
It is very easy to scapegoat and blame each other within a movement that is striving to be heard by larger forces who so easily manipulate the message: "Good" protesters and "bad" protesters.
In Toronto, as I write this, the people who have been breaking things (police cars, windows, corporate buildings) are not harming anything alive - they are attacking symbols rather than life - while the corporate status quo is daily harming/killing/destroying not only individual lives but whole ecosystems as a daily matter of course.
As a recent update stated: 'While the media focuses on its predictable ritual of scape-goating protestors, tens of thousands of labour, anti war, migrant justice, Indigenous solidarity, anarchist, environmental justice, anti-oppression, anti capitalist, socialist, student, and community-based activists took to the streets to expose and confront the violent policies of the criminal G20. The reasons they did so - Indigenous self determination; environmental justice; a world free of militarization; income equity and community control over resources; migrant justice; gender, queer, disability, and reproductive rights - are just as relevant today as they were this past weekend.'
The violence i'm seeing in all the reports - from corporate and independent media alike - is of police en masse with weapons and riot gear penning people in, attacking people, threatening and assaulting trans folk, queer folks and women, beating, trampling, charging, and injuring people (including people with disabilities, people holding babies, elders, journalists, random passersby, people in so-called `green zones`), rounding people up in mass arrests, sending people to the hospital with broken bones, throwing people physically to the ground by their necks, and generally using brute violence and intimidation against the population.
All of which is 'legitimated' by new laws passed very recently and very quietly (the lawyers and the mayor weren't even informed) stating that within the 'security perimiter' the Toronto police can bodily search anyone they wish upon demand, and can demand that we produce ID without the usual privacy and civil liberties protections we expect in this country.
This is Stephen Harper's Canada - and culturally, people`s acceptance of such a state of affairs smacks of Weimar Germany to anyone who has studied - or lived through - the rise of actual authoritarianism. It is also the side of Canada that those of us who are non-native don`t usually have to see. As Ray says in one of the interviews cited below, the brute force Canada has always used against native people under colonial rule, Canada is now using against the rest of us. Witness the four-hour pen at Queen and Spadina, or the charging at crowds peacefully assembled singing Oh Canada. What the state does to the most vulnerable of us, it will eventually do to all of us, so we must stand in solidarity with those who are most vulnerable.
I met a woman who had moved to Canada from the former Yugoslavia. She works at the flower shop where I picked up flowers to give to friends as they were released from jail last February. As she cut and wrapped daisies for me, she looked out the front window of her shop at the police lined up outside and the Canadian flags marching past, and said she left and came to Canada to get away from this kind of thing and never expected it here. Her words have stayed with me. "Didn't we learn anything? The german people put up with a lot before things got really bad."
For those not currently in TO who are asking what's going on and looking for analysis, here are the news sources IMHO currently worth using for information:
and on twitter by checking the #g20report hashtag
and following g20mobilize
and here are a few other stories and clips:
Journalist threatened with gang rape by police while being held; young woman searched "had finger put up her" by Toronto police: http://vimeo.com/12925239
Conditions in Detention Centre Illegal Immoral Dangerous: http://toronto.mediacoop.ca/story/conditions-g20-dentention-centre-are-i...
Police Drag Man With Cane: www.facebook.com/#!/video/video.php
Childcare/teacher in Green Zone says: "I had a walking stick, and they took it and broke it and pushed me" Journalist reports: "Police Broke Cameraman's Finger": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5G7aCgXtWg
"Refuse to be afraid, refuse to be silent": http://bchannelnews.tv/?p=5959
Report re arrests: http://bchannelnews.tv/?p=5959
Quiet Boost in Arrest Powers: http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/torontog20summit/article/828974--dalton-...
New Police Powers: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/g8-g20/news/new-police-powers-...
Police attack seated demonstrators who are singing Oh Canada: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Heb9BXjYcII
Provocateurs and Media Stunts: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5G7aCgXtWg
Real News journalist punched in the face by police, and police attack a deaf man for not hearing their commands: http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&I...
Police Fire at Protestors: http://www.thestar.com/videozone/829371--police-fire-muzzle-blast-at-pro...
"Your rights don't apply within this building": 18-year-old bystander detainee in mass roundups reports on treatment in detention: filthy conditions, denied water, food thrown on floor, 24-hour lights on, overcrowded containment, threats to gay people told to 'act straight': http://rabble.ca/rabbletv/program-guide/2010/06/features/exclusive-eight...
"learn what the issues actually are, and why people are resisting": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAOhCdWsb2M&feature=related
"Your Bra Is A Weapon and Must be Removed" Reports of freezing conditions, body searches in detention, told to stay away from all protests in the future despite no charges: http://rabble.ca/rabbletv/program-guide/2010/06/features/young-woman-tel...
Journalist beaten and arrested: http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/rabble-staff/2010/06/guardian-journalist...
"Whatever they do to native people they will eventually do to everybody else in this country." http://toronto.mediacoop.ca/story/outside-makeshift-prisonfor-us-native-...
Arrestees Disappear Down a Rabbit Hole: Lawyer http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/torontog20summit/article/829465--arreste...
Parents of 6 month old awoken with gun to head in bedroom, no warrants shown: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/toronto/story/2010/06/26/police-booth-raid426.html
Police State and Humiliation on Toronto's free streets: http://www.torontosun.com/news/columnists/joe_warmington/2010/06/27/1453...
Police detained and handcuffed journalists: http://toronto.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20100627/g20-protests-100...
Thank you to Patti Powell of Accapelaboratory for dialogue (and words ;P) that shaped some of this post; thank you to friends and organizers who have challenged me, argued with me, and taught me; those thoughts in some form or another make it into everything I write, whether we agree or disagree. And thank you to those who have put themselves on the line to keep our movements strong and thriving. We've got your back.