babble-intro-img
babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.

Eat vegetarian at work - the leftovers

al-Qa'bong
Offline
Joined: Feb 27 2003

Continued from the other thread.

 

Snert wrote:

 

But we had two staff members originally from Jamaica, and another from Trinidad, and we kind of understood that their leftover saltfish curry was the "food that smells".

 

….Anyway, I assume that those who support management's right to say "no meat" would also support management's right to say "no meat curry"?

 

This prohibition probably had more to do with their being West Indian than the odour emitted by their food, which is another issue entirely…I think. 

 

When I was a student, living in a residence with a lot of East Indians who cooked such "smelly" food, I caught a ride with my boss to my summer job - driving a manure spreader for a feedlot-cleaning operation.  The boss said he preferred the smell of the feedlots to that of the corridor outside my apartment.


Comments

bagkitty
Offline
Joined: Aug 27 2008

CBCarticlelinkedinOP wrote:

"The office here, we like to think of it as our temple. So it's important to us to have certain policies. Employees are free to obviously go out and do whatever they like outside the temple, but inside here, we try to stick to the policy," said Bedi.

[emphasis added to quote]

The Company's spokesperson's own words make it pretty clear that this is a pseudo-religious dogma being imposed. It may be laudable, it may have beneficial effects for the community at large, but it is still imposing an essentially religious barrier to employment. Off with their heads.

 


polly bee
Offline
Joined: Jul 14 2010

I find it interesting that this thread on "workers rights" has gone to two pages, whereas the one on women being told to dress sexy for their job petered out at only a few posts.


al-Qa'bong
Offline
Joined: Feb 27 2003

There's something about the existence of vegetarians that makes meat-eaters crazy.


bagkitty
Offline
Joined: Aug 27 2008

Just the missionary ones al-Q, just the missionary ones.Wink


kropotkin1951
Offline
Joined: Jun 6 2002

polly bee wrote:

I find it interesting that this thread on "workers rights" has gone to two pages, whereas the one on women being told to dress sexy for their job petered out at only a few posts.

Given that there are more male posters on this board and most male posters don't feel well versed enough in feminist thought to comment without stepping on a land mine I don't find it strange at all.

Everyone who wants to condemns it and any comments like Snert's above if posted in the feminist forum would almost certainly lead to a polite request to not post anymore. Then the topic would die out as the controversy is gone from the discussion.  I personally am never sure whether this is a good or bad thing but I lean towards not having to put up with misogynist statements and therefore there is often not much to say because there are no obnoxious points to refute.


Dodger718
Offline
Joined: Nov 23 2010

My daughter's school has a "no meat" policy because it's a Jewish school and they don't want kids bringing non-kosher meat into the school. There's also a "no peanuts" policy because of allergy concerns. It makes it a bit of a pain in teh ass but we knew the rules going in and agreed to them. It's hardly an undue hardship.


wage zombie
Offline
Joined: Dec 8 2004

These vegans are assigning personhood to animals.  People may or may not agree with that view, but that's the view they have.  Those who are arguing that it's not inclusive to ban the eating of animal carcasses in the lunch room are missing the point about what it means to include.

A small business that employs 18 people has a lunch room policy that people are free to not follow by simple eating their lunch somewhere else.  Meanwhile, both the planet and our country are being gored by the powers that be.  Fight on babble!  Where was that thread about effectiveness?


Snert
Offline
Joined: Nov 4 2008

Quote:
 There's also a "no peanuts" policy because of allergy concerns.

 

That's a safety concern, not a morality concern.


kropotkin1951
Offline
Joined: Jun 6 2002

Dodger718 wrote:

My daughter's school has a "no meat" policy because it's a Jewish school and they don't want kids bringing non-kosher meat into the school. There's also a "no peanuts" policy because of allergy concerns. It makes it a bit of a pain in teh ass but we knew the rules going in and agreed to them. It's hardly an undue hardship.

So you do not support public education? is your daughter being taught she is part of the "Chosen People" and the rest of us are second class peons to god?


polly bee
Offline
Joined: Jul 14 2010

al-Qa'bong wrote:

There's something about the existence of vegetarians that makes meat-eaters crazy.

Aint that the truth.  We met up with old friends on the weekend that we hadn't seen in over ten years.  We went out for supper, and she noticed that both of us ordered meatless and she was completely gobsmacked about it.  "Whaaaaaaat????  You don't eat MEAT?  Really??  When did that happen????  What DO you eat???"   You would have sworn we had admitted to joining some clandestine baby eating cult or something. 


Dodger718
Offline
Joined: Nov 23 2010

kropotkin1951 wrote:

Dodger718 wrote:

My daughter's school has a "no meat" policy because it's a Jewish school and they don't want kids bringing non-kosher meat into the school. There's also a "no peanuts" policy because of allergy concerns. It makes it a bit of a pain in teh ass but we knew the rules going in and agreed to them. It's hardly an undue hardship.

So you do not support public education? is your daughter being taught she is part of the "Chosen People" and the rest of us are second class peons to god?

What do you mean I don't "support public education". I pay may taxes which support public education and my wife and I choose to send her to a school outside of that system. Just like I "support public transit" despite sometimes driving a car or riding my bike or taking a taxi.

I won't even get into the rest of your drive-by nonsense...


wage zombie
Offline
Joined: Dec 8 2004

polly bee wrote:

al-Qa'bong wrote:

There's something about the existence of vegetarians that makes meat-eaters crazy.

Aint that the truth.

It is strange, and I don't understand it.  Most dietary choices have no effect on other people's emotional state.  But mention that you're a vegetarian and some people get quite uncomfortable (very noticeably).

I can't explain it.  I don't think it is repressed guilt, nor can I think of any other reason for the reaction.


Dodger718
Offline
Joined: Nov 23 2010

I wuldn't call it "repressed guilt" either but I think meat eaters might feel that a vegetarian would be negatively judging them and feeling superior (assuming their diet is based on moral choices as opposed to health reasons). I can tell you that the people who tend to scoff when I mention that my family keeps a kosher home tends to be Jews who don't keep kosher who may feel like we're judging their level of observance whereas most non-Jews don't care in the slightest and some express admiration for our committment.


polly bee
Offline
Joined: Jul 14 2010

I agree Dodger, I know when I tell people that I don't eat meat I generally get a lengthy description of their meat based diet and how little meat they actually eat and how organic they shop and so on.  Sometimes it sounds like they are apologizing for not being vegetarian while at the same time explaining that they "almost are" vegetarian while at the same time insisting that they love their meat too much to give it up.   Back in the day, I would have simply ordered a burger, they would have had the same, and dietary choices would never have come up in conversation.  It is odd.

 

Edit to add:  I get similar responses from my smoker friends when they notice I don't smoke anymore.


Unionist
Offline
Joined: Dec 11 2005

kropotkin1951 wrote:

Dodger718 wrote:

My daughter's school has a "no meat" policy because it's a Jewish school and they don't want kids bringing non-kosher meat into the school. There's also a "no peanuts" policy because of allergy concerns. It makes it a bit of a pain in teh ass but we knew the rules going in and agreed to them. It's hardly an undue hardship.

So you do not support public education? is your daughter being taught she is part of the "Chosen People" and the rest of us are second class peons to god?

Kropotkin, please retract that. I know you don't mean it as an anti-semitic meme, but that's what it is.

 


kropotkin1951
Offline
Joined: Jun 6 2002

Unionist wrote:

kropotkin1951 wrote:

Dodger718 wrote:

My daughter's school has a "no meat" policy because it's a Jewish school and they don't want kids bringing non-kosher meat into the school. There's also a "no peanuts" policy because of allergy concerns. It makes it a bit of a pain in teh ass but we knew the rules going in and agreed to them. It's hardly an undue hardship.

So you do not support public education? is your daughter being taught she is part of the "Chosen People" and the rest of us are second class peons to god?

Kropotkin, please retract that. I know you don't mean it as an anti-semitic meme, but that's what it is.

 

I will add to it to make it clear it is not just jewish religious schools I despise.

Jewish schools are the same as fundamentalist christian schools for preaching the same Chosen People shit.  I do not believe anyone who tells me that their god chose them or speaks to them and I think that as more and more people of various fundamentalist faiths send their children to indoctrination centers the more fucked up and intolerant our society gets.  I would have said the same comment to a born again.


al-Qa'bong
Offline
Joined: Feb 27 2003

polly bee wrote:

I agree Dodger, I know when I tell people that I don't eat meat I generally get a lengthy description of their meat based diet and how little meat they actually eat and how organic they shop and so on.  Sometimes it sounds like they are apologizing for not being vegetarian while at the same time explaining that they "almost are" vegetarian while at the same time insisting that they love their meat too much to give it up.   Back in the day, I would have simply ordered a burger, they would have had the same, and dietary choices would never have come up in conversation.  It is odd.

I've had many of these conversations myself.  There is the type where the meat-eater would either apologise or make rationalisations about eating meat, as if their dietary choice somehow mattered to me or they thought that they were offending me by eating meat.  Typically I hear, "I'd eat less meat, except..."  These seem to be the most common.

I recieve an entirely different response from other circles.  I have a buddy who bow-hunts deer.  He makes no apologies.  Those cattle farmers I worked for were the same.  These people think meatlessness is weird, but they shrug their shoulders and say, "whatever."  Their attitudes are refreshingly free of judgement.


Maysie
Offline
Joined: Apr 21 2005

kropotkin, while your anti-religious-schools thread drift is noted as not being only about Jewish schools, the term Chosen People, especially when capitalized, is a well-known reference to Jewish people and is used as an anti-Semitic slur.

It's not okay.

Please retract or acknowledge this. And we should stop with any further drift of the thread topic.

 


kropotkin1951
Offline
Joined: Jun 6 2002

I am sorry that I responded to someone trumpeting their sending their children to jewish schools with a jewish reference that is in fact often used by anti-semites.

I should have not said chosen people I should merely have asked if they are taught the same as other children of fundamentalist religions are taught i.e. that their religion is the only true one and other religions are not gods religion but abominations for which they will be punished.  


Maysie
Offline
Joined: Apr 21 2005

Thanks kropotkin. 

Now, back to the thread topic!


polly bee
Offline
Joined: Jul 14 2010

 

Quote:

Matt & Nat
In case you didn’t know, this uber-hip Vegan handbag line out of Montreal makes fashionable bags and wallets and totes from recycled water bottles. In addition to being environmentally smart, designer Inder Bedi gives back to various charities throughout Europe, Canada and the United States. From battered women’s shelters to animal rights, Bedi cares. He also sees that hundreds of homeless people eat a vegetarian meal twice annually in their home base of Montreal.

Additionally, a dollar for every bag sold goes to the charity of your choice. Within the first quarter, the line has accumulated charitable contribution dollars exceeding $16,000.

 

http://www.jaunted.com/story/2009/11/5/201554/172/travel/Five+Travel+Gear+Companies+That+Give+Back+To+The+World

 


bagkitty
Offline
Joined: Aug 27 2008

Mostly in response to polly bee's anecdotes about dining with carnivores.

I think there is a distinction that should be drawn between discussions that take place before a meal, and those that take place during a meal.

Before the meal, whether it be deciding on a restaurant or settling on a menu to be cooked at home, I think it is quite valid to raise questions as to whether any of the (potential) diners has dietary restrictions - self-imposed or otherwise - or strong aversions to something. In my experience, I don't think vegetarians or vegans are necessarily singled out or ostracized on this basis.

Perhaps my experience is skewed (I have family members with very severe [potentially life threatening] allergies to certain food items), and have been responsible for providing "refreshments" or meals where "consumers" of the food have "diverse" dietary restrictions (veggie, vegan, Muslim, Mormon, etc.). I think it is incumbent on me to inquire in advance if there are any food restrictions that apply (asking at a meeting if anyone has food allergies that I should watch out for, things that should be avoided or that they should be alerted about for personal or religious reasons) -- whether I am an individual who is hosting or if I am volunteering to provide a service within a group, it is up to me to inquire in advance. The flip side of this is that I think that it is the responsibility of the person who is operating under the food restriction to speak up and provide information that makes my task possible (okay veggie, but are you strictly vegan or an ova-lacto vegetarian? is it sufficient to avoid pork and shellfish, or should I make sure that any "dead animal" that may be there has come from a halal butcher? I know enough to avoid lard in baked goods, but if the vanilla flavouring is out of a bottle (i.e., suspended in alcohol) rather than fresh vanilla beans does the fact that the alcohol itself will boil off during baking suffice or is the end product still haram?)

On one level I understand that no-one wants to be singled out for the "inquisition", but reasonable accomodation requires information... and particularly in those situations where someone's food restrictions are based on ritual purity, don't assume this carnivorous atheist (or anyone else) is sufficiently concerned about the intricacies of another's particular superstitions to be familiar with the minutiae.

When food is actually being consumed, I think the onus shifts. As tempting as it may sometimes be to drop an "ew, how can you eat that" that bomb (something I am tempted to do when people are gorging on broccoli or cauliflower or head cheese... my three big NO WAY is that passing my lips items) I think it is the height of discourtesy to talk about anyone else's meal other than to inquire if they are enjoying their choice (okay, perhaps a couple of variants - the "I have never tried that before, what is it like - is it enjoyable" and the "oh, nice choice, I wish I had order that too"). So-called jokes about whether what the other person is consuming is "just bunny food", "has more calories than is good for you", "smells funny", "had a mother" and the flip side "you don't know what you are missing" are out of line. They are rude and judgemental and during a meal is not the time to be doing it debating someone else's food choices (or pontificating about your own).

With a couple of very, very memorable exceptions (in my experience at least) the people who feel the least responsibility to contain their rudeness fall into one of two camps. The first of those are the "white bread, meat and 'taters" crowd - and I think it is these that the vegetarians and vegans in our midst have been referring to and I don't think I have to go on at any great length describing their rude behaviour.

The second camp (and hats off to j.m. in the previous thread for identifying them) are, to paraphrase, "Western vegetarians and vegans". While my evidence is only anecdotal, I feel that their rude commentary and dietary chauvinism has disrupted way too many food sharing occasions for me to excuse them. What offends me the most is to listen to them belittle volunteers who have given of their time to purchase, prepare and present "refreshments" at meetings and other social events (and the harshness of their criticism seems to have an inverse relationship to their willingness to take on the voluntary work of providing the refreshments). That others do not know the details of, or share the militant fervour about, someone's dietary regime does not grant anyone a pass on being courteous. While "rules of hospitality" may not be as formal in contemporary Canadian society as they may have been in the past (or still are in other settings), along with the host's responsibility to accomodate the guest, is the guest's (or participants if it is not a hosted event) responsibility to accept that the host's efforts are presented with the best of intentions and good will.


polly bee
Offline
Joined: Jul 14 2010

I would just like to second that......"ewwwwwwwwwwwwww headcheese". 


Snert
Offline
Joined: Nov 4 2008

It's OK... it doesn't really contain any cheese.


polly bee
Offline
Joined: Jul 14 2010

My mom used to make headcheese.  I remember opening the freezer one time to see two severed pigs heads on freezer trays staring back at me.  I puked.

 

edit to add:   the ultimate threadkill comment?


Doug
Offline
Joined: Apr 17 2001

I never said they weren't a fine company otherwise, just that it does seem like an excessive intrusion into their workers' lives.


Sineed
Offline
Joined: Dec 4 2005

bagkitty wrote:

As tempting as it may sometimes be to drop an "ew, how can you eat that" that bomb (something I am tempted to do when people are gorging on broccoli or cauliflower...

So I guess broccoliflower is out of the question:

Speaking of Western vegetarians, I have a little anecdote: I worked at Shoppers with a pharmacist from Russia who was working as my assistant, as she was not yet licensed here.  A customer asked me for advice on vitamins, so I asked, as I always do, are you vegetarian?  After I finished talking to the customer, my assistant asked, what is a vegetarian?  She kept hearing about it, and didn't understand what it was about.  So I started explaining about vegetarianism, vegan vs lacto-ovo, etc.  So she said, "In Russia, we do not have vegetarians.  In Russia, we eat what we can get."

So yeah; we should be polite about people's food choices, and grateful that we have options.


Unionist
Offline
Joined: Dec 11 2005

Doug wrote:

I never said they weren't a fine company otherwise, just that it does seem like an excessive intrusion into their workers' lives.

That's deeply irrelevant. Who cares if they're a fine company or not? If they say, please don't bring meat on the premises, that's the end of the story. Please respond to the example of the Muslim-run laundromat that requests that customers and employees not bring pork onto the premises.

 


Catchfire
Offline
Joined: Apr 16 2003

Did you know that Broccoli is already a hybrid plant? It's half cabbage, half cauliflower. Incredible, I know.


Sineed
Offline
Joined: Dec 4 2005

How about these hybrids?

They taste just the same as the white, IMV.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or register to post comments