babble-intro-img
babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.

Kirpans II

36 replies [Last post]

Comments

Doug
Offline
Joined: Apr 17 2001

milo204 wrote:

i still think the easiest way to solve this debate is (what some sikhs have proposed) to carry a kirpan that cannot be confused with a knife.  Then it can be worn at all times (on planes or other places where knives are not allowed) and still meet the religious requirement.

 

As I understand there isn't consensus among Sikhs about this. Some think that a nonfunctional symbolic kirpan is sufficient while others insist on the real thing since they're supposed to be able to defend someone else with it at need. So that doesn't get rid of the problem.

Quote:

i think the point of the scottish daggers is relevant, perhaps someone with more knowledge on this could say, but if that cultural symbol isn't allowed why would they allow others?  did the scottish people remove their daggers without complaint and that's why it never came to be debated or talked about?

 

It's not really relevant because it's not a religious obligation to possess or wear a sgian dubh. It isn't a comparable thing.

 


Unionist
Offline
Joined: Dec 11 2005

What's this thread doing in Ontario?


RevolutionPlease
Offline
Joined: Oct 15 2007

Sorry fir the concern,


Catchfire
Offline
Joined: Apr 16 2003

We shall absorb your paltry nation yet, Unionist. But for now, I shall acquiesce to your request.


Unionist
Offline
Joined: Dec 11 2005

Catchfire wrote:

We shall absorb your paltry nation yet, Unionist. But for now, I shall acquiesce to your request.

Some paltry. Some absorb!!

 


Caissa
Offline
Joined: Jun 14 2006

Resistance is futile.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or register to post comments