babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.
I do believe is Wallace could have been criticized in terms of one of the most taboo—yet most needed—conversations: white female privilege.
Of course, when this phrase is put into the public square of ideas, quite a few white women, both feminist and non, will storm in with their vociferous exceptionalizing to this privilege—more specifically, how their individual selves are the exceptions to this because of mitigating identities and circumstances: they aren’t able-bodied; they don’t fit the blonde-and-blue phenotype; they aren’t slender and/or or buxom; they are poor or come from poverty; they are not educated and/or hipsters; they are in interracial relationships; so on and so forth. Usually, the exceptionalizing derails the conversation into silence. But for a person without that privilege, especially if the privilege is based on that person’s degradation or erasure, the mitigated advantage is still an advantage. The mitigation(s) shape(s) the privilege as that of gradation, not kind.
But, as Audre Lorde said, silence doesn’t protect … in this case, the privilege getting read.
@ Maysie
Yeah, you're right.
Grrrr
Racialicious on recent Alexandra Wallace video and related fallout: Go After the Privilege, Not the Tits
If this thread isn't an example hereabouts of a siesmic shift of late, I don't know what is.