babble-intro-img
babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.

Toronto Pride funding in danger - here we go again!

59 replies [Last post]

Comments

bagkitty
Offline
Joined: Aug 27 2008

Excellent tactical move on the part of QuAIA... I hope it is followed up by a statement out of PT which will say, albeit in more diplomatic language, "Fuck you, we will not pre-emptively ban anyone!" and then demand that both Ford and Mammoliti be tested for rabies and quarantined if necessary. I hope that when the asshat's motion is debated, repeated reference is made to the City's own report (see link in post #23 above) and he gets laughed out of the chamber.


swallow
Offline
Joined: May 16 2002

Quote:
The committee heard from more than 45 speakers, 26 in support of PT, during the eight-hour meeting. In the end, no motion was brought forward that would have made funding contingent on a guarantee by PT that the group Queers Against Israeli Apartheid (QuAIA) take no part in any festival events, anywhere, all week.


A city manager’s report, released in April, confirmed that the phrase "Israeli apartheid" – and by extension QuAIA's participation in Pride celebrations – does not violate the city's anti-discrimination policy. Those who oppose QuAIA's participation have argued from the outset of the controversy that it does, and that, therefore, makes PT ineligible for city funding. 

It’s good news for PT. But Ward 27 Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam warns, “Council rules supreme. So at any time there could be a motion on the floor of council for a vote in June without notice. Then we would have to open it up and go through a big debate all over again, this time without public consultation.... But it seems unlikely because council voted unanimously to receive the report. I was scared because some councillors had their knives out and had made some threats.”

Xtra: Pride funding likely safe

Quote:
Although the controversy over QuAIA’s involvement in Toronto Pride propelled the debate of Israeli Apartheid into the public, the group is not fundamentally about the right to march in the Pride Parade. QuAIA’s primary project is to combat pinkwashing. In the lead-up to Pride 2011, the group will launch a campaign calling on queers to join the Boycott, Divestment and Sanction of Israel movement as a peaceful tactic to pressure the Israeli government to comply with international law. It is also working to build stronger connections with other groups doing similar work internationally to help bring the issue of pinkwashing to the forefront of larger queer movements. Recent attacks on the LGBT Community Center in New York for hosting an Israeli Apartheid Week event are not isolated incidents. As the successful fight against Toronto Pride’s banning of QuAIA demonstrates, solidarity work is at the heart of queer struggles, and it is only through collective action that we can effectively defend these spaces.

Briarpatch: Sanitizing Pride

 


Roscoe
Offline
Joined: Nov 7 2010

How much funding is at risk?


edmundoconnor
Offline
Joined: Jul 7 2009

"In 2010, PT received a $123,807 grant and about $250,000 worth of in-kind services from the city, including garbage cleanup and policing."

From here.


Roscoe
Offline
Joined: Nov 7 2010

Thats not even a rounding error in the city budget is it?

What is Toronto policy on event grants and in-kind services? Is Toronto's position on political use of city sponsored events a matter of even-handed policy or is the Pride event a political football?

In other words, does the city grant funds to other venues or events that include and activist component or is the politicisation of the Pride event the only event that Toronto city is concerned about?


Maysie
Offline
Joined: Apr 21 2005

I guess it depends on what you define as political.

The City's monetary and in-kind contributions to Pride are pretty insignificant, to both the City and to a lesser extent, to Pride.

The City of Toronto funds museums, which are hugely political with an enormous political agenda, and no I'm not being funny.

They also fund special events like a Canada Day event every year, enough said.

They fund Summerlicious and Winterlicious, which are basically extended advertising and marketing campaigns for upscale restaurants. Certainly not a free event open to all.

Pride brings in tens of millions of dollars into the city every year. Through tourism (hotels, cabs, restaurants) and locals spending in bars and restaurants.

If this was really about money, Mayor Tight Purse Strings Asshole Fuckwad wouldn't give a shit. It's about ideology. QUAIA is a smokescreen.


Roscoe
Offline
Joined: Nov 7 2010

Very progressive ass chewing Laughing You must practice. 

 If this funding is relatively insignificant, why not find other funding and refuse to give the TPSAFs a soapbox? Make Pride a successful event in spite of the city. Leave them on the outside looking in AND, explaining why.


Maysie
Offline
Joined: Apr 21 2005

Roscoe wrote:

Very progressive ass chewing Laughing You must practice.

Years of practice, dahhling.  Cool

 

Roscoe wrote:
If this funding is relatively insignificant, why not find other funding and refuse to give the TPSAFs a soapbox? Make Pride a successful event in spite of the city. Leave them on the outside looking in AND, explaining why.

I think they need the city for permits, garbage, po-po, etc. But that's a great idea.


swallow
Offline
Joined: May 16 2002

The funding is insignificant for the City. Is is fairly significant for Pride. Finding other funding might well eman going cap in hand to the wealthiest donors in the LGBT communities. The Salah Bashir Pride Parade? 

The City's proposed funding cut was also, of course, an example of vicious attacks designed to shut down open debate. Sometimes those are worth standing up to, maybe? (Even though I agree with the growing community consensus for a stripped-down, less corporate, more activist and free-speechy Pride.)


Doug
Offline
Joined: Apr 17 2001

It's not unusual for creepy guys with videocameras to film the Dyke March hoping to get some boobie shots. It's much more unusual for one of the to be a city councillor.

 

Giorgio Mammoliti and his camcorder want to axe city funding for Pride Week.

The city councillor says he captured an anti-Israeli group chanting the controversial phrase “Israeli Apartheid” during Saturday’s Dyke Parade.


takeitslowly
Offline
Joined: May 31 2009

i think i am going to go tomorrow and hold a sign reading israelie aparthied.


voice of the damned
Offline
Joined: Sep 23 2004

i think i am going to go tomorrow and hold a sign reading israelie aparthied

You might want to keep in mind that you would not likely be the person bearing the brunt of any blowback from that action. The rule in question is a funding stipulation, not a criminal law. So, it's not like you will personally get arrested for waving around that sign. Rather, someone will probably just take your picture, and post it on the internet or in the media. Then, some Ford flunky on council can use it as proof as to why Pride should be de-funded.

I have no problem with an Israeli Apartheid sign being waved around, at Pride or anywhere else. Just that, if you're going to make a poltical statement that could jeopardize the future of Pride(while costing you comparatively little) you might want to clear it with the other interested parties first.  


Northern Shoveler
Offline
Joined: Feb 17 2011

Doff the cap and move along, don't forget your place. Yes sir I understand, where is the designated protest area?

Apparently blackmail is an effective political tool guaranteed to drive a wedge in the movement as people take sides on whether or not to do  as the blackmailer says. 


edmundoconnor
Offline
Joined: Jul 7 2009

Doug wrote:

It's not unusual for creepy guys with videocameras to film the Dyke March hoping to get some boobie shots. It's much more unusual for one of the to be a city councillor.

 

Giorgio Mammoliti and his camcorder want to axe city funding for Pride Week.

The city councillor says he captured an anti-Israeli group chanting the controversial phrase “Israeli Apartheid” during Saturday’s Dyke Parade.

Slightly less surprising coming from a man whose rampant homophobia has been on display in the past. Mammoliti was simply aching to find someone, *anyone*, to say or shout 'Israeli Apartheid' (and unless Pride organizers had mind control over all paraders, that is simply impossible to stop). Whether he found someone is open to debate, since his recorded footage has not yet surfaced. He is the archetype of those bigots and homophobes eager to use the Israeli issue as cover for them to parade their antediluvian beliefs.


voice of the damned
Offline
Joined: Sep 23 2004

Doff the cap and move along, don't forget your place. Yes sir I understand, where is the designated protest area?

Apparently blackmail is an effective political tool guaranteed to drive a wedge in the movement as people take sides on whether or not to do  as the blackmailer says. 

I'm not neccessarily saying that people shouldn't buck the funding stipulations. Just that if you do, it would probably be a good idea to consult with other people who would be effected by any loss of funding.

It's kind of like if you're an actor in a theatre troupe that gets government funding, but one of the conditions of the funding is that the word "fuck" doesn't get uttered on stage. Okay, so you think that the stipulation is prudish and absurd(and I'd agree). But, before you go on stage and let out an unscripted torrent of "fuck this and fuck that", you might want to mention your plan to the other members of the troupe to make sure the group as a whole is prepared to absorb the consequences. Otherwise, you're just being the big hero for a few seconds, while allowing the collective to deal with a blowback they weren't neccessarily prepared for.


takeitslowly
Offline
Joined: May 31 2009

 

I never intended to march in the parade, so I don't know why it would matter or not if I hold a sign reading Israelie apartheid as an individual attending the pride event.  Pride doesn't belong to the Pride organizer. The street is public to everyone.

 

Anyways I didn't go because I had better things to do. I attended trans pride on Friday and that was enough for me. I also think its quite dangerous to hold a sign reading israelie apartheid, so it takes some courage regardless if I can be arrested or not. I remember holding such a sign 2 years ago in Pride, as an individual (not part of any organization or marchers) and I have people yelling at me, and bottles were thrown at marchers identified as queers against israelie apartheid , so yeah there are risks.

 

And as a transgender woman of color , I resent the idea that I have to risk my own personal safety in order to express my belief about human rights for Palestinians (or anyone) at a pride event. I think pride should be about feeling safe, and championing human rights for everyone, and I don't like bigots fucking with my pride and telling me what can or cannot come out of my mouth. (literally speaking)

 

I dont care about being a hero, i want to keep my pride at pride.


Northern Shoveler
Offline
Joined: Feb 17 2011

voice of the damned wrote:

It's kind of like if you're an actor in a theatre troupe that gets government funding, but one of the conditions of the funding is that the word "fuck" doesn't get uttered on stage. 

I don't think that things like a movements day to strut its stuff needs a fucking director with a megaphone telling people what to say and what not to say.  But then I think movements should be organic not orchestrated.

Any ideas who the director is in your scenario?  IMO it is the homophobic asshole who will be directing the Pride Day if you let him.  Not my town not my parade so I am only commenting.  


Polunatic2
Offline
Joined: Mar 12 2006
If the city cancels Pride funding, perhaps the organizers should consider not doing the parade next year. Let Ford explain it to the restaurants, hotels, bars, clubs, corner stores, etc.

edmundoconnor
Offline
Joined: Jul 7 2009
Unionist
Offline
Joined: Dec 11 2005

aka Mycroft wrote:

When they were trustees Pasternak and Matlow tried hard to get the TDSB to ban the Shepherd's Graddaughter and Three Wishes because the books were deemed critical of Israel.

So expect Pasternak and Matlow to push hard on QUAIA and on any other Isreal related issue they can come up with.

I'm no expert on Toronto politics, but this Matlow character seems to have the same view of workers' rights as he does of the rights of queers to support Palestinians. Can't you Torontonians send him packing or something?

Evil powerful union boss threatens terrible things to hapless city councillor for just expressing his innocent opinion in a little tweet


Bacchus
Offline
Joined: Dec 8 2003

Nice to see the union playing into Ford's hands and driving councillors into his camp


RevolutionPlease
Offline
Joined: Oct 15 2007

I don't think so. Matlow was below the belt. Ford's going down fast. Who pricked him? It's windy tonight.


Bacchus
Offline
Joined: Dec 8 2003

Nothing really counts until the next election. He has all that time to truly offend everyone or pull a last minute rabbit andget relected


RevolutionPlease
Offline
Joined: Oct 15 2007

True that. Thanks for the reminder. Yell


Bacchus
Offline
Joined: Dec 8 2003

Sorry just a tad cynical these days


Doug
Offline
Joined: Apr 17 2001

Bacchus wrote:

Nothing really counts until the next election. He has all that time to truly offend everyone or pull a last minute rabbit andget relected

 

True. Never, ever underestimate an incumbent in municipal politics. It's a weird thing when they don't get re-elected.


bagkitty
Offline
Joined: Aug 27 2008

Oh it must be that time of year, they are moving to defund Toronto Pride, again.... what is with you Central Canadian Overlords anyway?

On a related note, why is it that Rabble has nothing in their searchable data base about this latest attempt for the City of Toronto to stifle free speech by members of the LGBT communities?


Doug
Offline
Joined: Apr 17 2001

It's getting to be an annual event, part of Pride. Before the training of volunteers and the setting up of booths, we must have the ritual threat to city funding. It gets more boring every year, at least until council actually does something more than send nasty letters.


Doug
Offline
Joined: Apr 17 2001

It's getting to be an annual event, part of Pride. Before the training of volunteers and the setting up of booths, we must have the ritual threat to city funding. It gets more boring every year, at least until council actually does something more than send nasty letters.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or register to post comments