babble-intro-img
babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.

NDP Preamble Missing

60 replies [Last post]

Comments

Gaian
Offline
Joined: Aug 5 2011
I haven't heard any complain about the rise of the NDP or what it stands for. And you mustn't ever read,watch,listen to the mainstream media in their intent, watchful, salivating preparedness to f..k over the party and frighten those millions who are not out waving placards. I don't believe we have to appeal to the occupiers of Wall Street. In the states, democratic socialists are the subject of surveillance. But then, perhaps the whole electoral procedure is boring for you?

Boom Boom
Offline
Joined: Dec 29 2004

Gaian wrote:
I don't believe we have to appeal to the occupiers of Wall Street.

At least be on their side, eh? Kiss


Gaian
Offline
Joined: Aug 5 2011
Boom Boom wrote:

Gaian wrote:
I don't believe we have to appeal to the occupiers of Wall Street.

At least be on their side, eh? Kiss

It would be very difficult for anyone not to be, hereabouts, having waited for signs of life on mainstreet for a half century now. I'll bet you've noticed the signs of acquiescence to capitalist ways on the lower north shore for some time now Boom Boom. ? :)

knownothing
Offline
Joined: Mar 24 2011

Gaian wrote:
I haven't heard any complain about the rise of the NDP or what it stands for. And you mustn't ever read,watch,listen to the mainstream media in their intent, watchful, salivating preparedness to f..k over the party and frighten those millions who are not out waving placards. I don't believe we have to appeal to the occupiers of Wall Street. In the states, democratic socialists are the subject of surveillance. But then, perhaps the whole electoral procedure is boring for you?

No matter what they change the preamble to or whatever the NDP calls itself we will always be labeled socialists by big business and the Torys. When we run from it like you are suggesting it gives validation to their scare tactics.

I tell you one thing, if the NDP wins and the business community ISNT freaking out then there is something to be worried about. 


Slumberjack
Online
Joined: Aug 8 2005

knownothing wrote:
I tell you one thing, if the NDP wins and the business community ISNT freaking out then there is something to be worried about. 

You'd think that at least some worrying should have commenced by now though, with the recent status improvements.


Krago
Online
Joined: Sep 9 2002

Does anyone have links to the actual preamble and the proposed replacement?


Boom Boom
Offline
Joined: Dec 29 2004

Gaian wrote:
I'll bet you've noticed the signs of acquiescence to capitalist ways on the lower north shore for some time now Boom Boom. ? :)

Ha! Laughing

I think I can say without fear of contradiction that folks here on the LNS are seeing signs of capitalism's failure everywhere. The latest occurred in early spring of this year when the Newfoundland company that owns the fish plant in La Tabatiere decided not to open the plant this year, throwing roughly 100 folks out of work in what is a seasonal industry. The Mayor - who used to be the Liberal candidate here, and a good friend of mine - has been scrambling since then for job opportunities in the region, and some make-work programs funded by gov't have been found, but clearly these are not a long range solution. That same Newfoundland company shut down the fish plant here - forcing Kegaska workers to leave this community and head out west to the oil sands, or up north to work as construction labourers or at fishing camps as guides. A few were hired on here to unload the fishing boats onto a 'collector boat' which sends all the crab to Natashquan where it is all loaded onto huge refrigerated tractor trailers for processing in Montreal, Japan, and points south - all this processing of crab used to be done here on the coast - now I think there's only one crab processing plant on the entire Lower North Shore. With the closing of the fish plants, I estimate that well over 200 good paying (seasonal) jobs supplemented by UIC on the LNS have been lost, so it's no wonder that the LNS is going down in population as folks look for jobs elsewhere. Frown

ETA: it really pisses me off that local crab is sent to Montreal and Japan for processing - we did that here, and communities prospered.


M. Spector
Offline
Joined: Feb 19 2005

Krago wrote:

Does anyone have links to the actual preamble and the proposed replacement?

Check out the Kady O'Malley link in the opening post above. She gives links to the existing preamble, the proposed change that was tabled at the convention, and the mutilated version of the constitution that the NDP is presenting at present.


Gaian
Offline
Joined: Aug 5 2011
knownothing wrote:

Gaian wrote:
I haven't heard any complain about the rise of the NDP or what it stands for. And you mustn't ever read,watch,listen to the mainstream media in their intent, watchful, salivating preparedness to f..k over the party and frighten those millions who are not out waving placards. I don't believe we have to appeal to the occupiers of Wall Street. In the states, democratic socialists are the subject of surveillance. But then, perhaps the whole electoral procedure is boring for you?

No matter what they change the preamble to or whatever the NDP calls itself we will always be labeled socialists by big business and the Torys. When we run from it like you are suggesting it gives validation to their scare tactics.

I tell you one thing, if the NDP wins and the business community ISNT freaking out then there is something to be worried about. 

kw, when mainstreet begins to show at least a smidgin' of understanding regarding the several variants of "socialist", when they can laugh at the negative ads of the right, and the sad scribblings of the hacks - understand what Chris Hedges is saying - I'll be all for flying the socialist flag. But in the current climate where folks are titillated by the brave words of the Don Cherrys and the Kevin O'Learys, it seems too much like a masochistic exercise. I'm not into self-flagellation just to satisfy some inner, noble sentiment.

Slumberjack
Online
Joined: Aug 8 2005

I suppose it all depends on what sort of banner one is willing to stand under come hell or highwater, the Cherry-O'Leary's be damned.


M. Spector
Offline
Joined: Feb 19 2005

Socialism yesterday and socialism tomorrow, but never socialism today.


Gaian
Offline
Joined: Aug 5 2011
Slumberjack wrote:

I suppose it all depends on what sort of banner one is willing to stand under come hell or highwater, the Cherry-O'Leary's be damned.

That's the self-defeating, noble sentiment, exactly. Bang on.

Slumberjack
Online
Joined: Aug 8 2005

Gaian wrote:
 That's the self-defeating, noble sentiment, exactly. Bang on.

Apparently with some strains of modern socialism, that old fashioned noble sentiment, where one is never called upon to contemplate the merits of imperial bombing against the citizens of other countries, constitutes an embarrassing anachronism that has no place within today's progressive momentum.  The rest of us are left to wonder whether they've grounded their particular version of socialism with background research from the correct Marx.


Aristotleded24
Offline
Joined: May 24 2005

knownothing wrote:
I tell you one thing, if the NDP wins and the business community ISNT freaking out then there is something to be worried about.

Even moreso. In Saskatchewan and Manitoba, the NDP provincial governments have been pretty accomodating to the business community and yet the right wing press continues to make them out to be tax-and-spend socialists. In the last few years of the Calvert government, if you read the press, you would have had the impression that the Bolsheviks were about to take over Douglas Park any day.


knownothing
Offline
Joined: Mar 24 2011

Gaian wrote:
Slumberjack wrote:

I suppose it all depends on what sort of banner one is willing to stand under come hell or highwater, the Cherry-O'Leary's be damned.

That's the self-defeating, noble sentiment, exactly. Bang on.

If you want a party that is market-friendly and still believes in a strong social safety net isn't that what Liberals are?

What defines the NDP is its anti-capitalist stance. It is not something to be afraid of as we can see there is a quite a wave of anti-capitalist sentiment.

Also, socialism is an ideology ahead of its time, eventually the world will catch up with it.


Gaian
Offline
Joined: Aug 5 2011
knownothing wrote:

Gaian wrote:
Slumberjack wrote:

I suppose it all depends on what sort of banner one is willing to stand under come hell or highwater, the Cherry-O'Leary's be damned.

That's the self-defeating, noble sentiment, exactly. Bang on.

If you want a party that is market-friendly and still believes in a strong social safety net isn't that what Liberals are?

What defines the NDP is its anti-capitalist stance. It is not something to be afraid of as we can see there is a quite a wave of anti-capitalist sentiment.

Also, socialism is an ideology ahead of its time, eventually the world will catch up with it.

kn, I'm not "market friendly", but I'm living off pensions that are market-dependent. Somehow we have to make it possible to invest in state ventures that are morally and environmentally sustainable. Perhaps in Slow Money, lower returns from investment in basic agriculture. How to get to that utopian condition has been my concern for some four decades now, and I'm running out of time, but it keeps my brain active, reading what others have to say on the subject. And if the media are going to continue poisoning and corrupting mainstreet - and in reading Hedges I see no light at the end of the tunnel - I'm just going to go a bit opaque, like the Occupiers of Streets, but holding steady to socialist objectives. A rose by any other name.... :)

knownothing
Offline
Joined: Mar 24 2011

And you think a social democratic government that doesn't stand for nationalization has a chance of taking on capitalism in this country and the world?


Gaian
Offline
Joined: Aug 5 2011
Consider the situation where a party has somehow come to elected power and it proposes nationalizing the means of production...and all those workers with pensions riding on the success of all that industry, acquiesce. Read my last post again. Fundamental change is coming, kn. And not much of it will be pretty. But as Hedges, Wolin, et al maintain, we must be in a position to lead that change or our "inverted totalitarianism" becomes the real McCoy, and there's boo-all that we could do about it in democratic fashion. In fact, democracy would be very unfashionable. And as Joe Bageant explained, it's his family and their friends that have the guns. (It always mystified me, back in the 1960s when I still picked up a shotgun from time to time, that the revolutionaries would not hear of gun ownerhip. Even while pointing out that Allende should have armed the workers...somehow, without exciting the military.

knownothing
Offline
Joined: Mar 24 2011

I disagree. I think real fascism would be easier to fight against then the inverted variety we have now. True fascism is obviously a problem, what we have is not obvious to most people. And as long as you keep advocating moderation of anti-capitalist sentiment you are feeding the inverted totalitarianism.

You keep worrying about your pension and the powers that be know they got you by the balls.

 


Gaian
Offline
Joined: Aug 5 2011
knownothing wrote:

I disagree. I think real fascism would be easier to fight against then the inverted variety we have now. True fascism is obviously a problem, what we have is not obvious to most people. And as long as you keep advocating moderation of anti-capitalist sentiment you are feeding the inverted totalitarianism.

You keep worrying about your pension and the powers that be know they got you by the balls.

 

Tell that, my friend, to all those folks working toward something for their golden years. I'm past that point, one of the really lucky generation,rode in on the cusp of the welfare state, missed the Great Depression, the war and what's about to happen. Try to put yourself in the shoes of real people - those folk for whom it's now "not obvious" - when you "THINK real fascism would be easier to fight."

knownothing
Offline
Joined: Mar 24 2011

Tell that to all the people of my generation who don't even have a prospect for a pension and you want me to worry about you and your pension.


Boom Boom
Offline
Joined: Dec 29 2004

I blame the baby boomers. Oh, wait, I am one. Sealed


Caissa
Offline
Joined: Jun 14 2006

A new explanation for your name I see. Wink


Boom Boom
Offline
Joined: Dec 29 2004

I've decided to come clean. Innocent


Gaian
Offline
Joined: Aug 5 2011
knownothing wrote:

Tell that to all the people of my generation who don't even have a prospect for a pension and you want me to worry about you and your pension.

Dear old kn, you keep repeating that I'm worried about my pension and that I'm appealing for your sympathy. Some oldtimers I know are in a bad way. I'm not. In about two years, that will not be a concern for anyone. No, I'm worried about how you and your generation and my family - I must admit I'm worried about my family more than about you - will be right up against it, suffering from what I'm concerned about now. Kn, gather all your 20 or 30 something friends, fill them in on the political economy of the world, and lead them out to glory, free of lamentation. But please, don't keep saying that I'm worried about me. Far too late for that. However, I manage to bear up with a good bar, a couple of good friends, and an active mental life, reading or skimming two or three new non-fiction works each month. Oh, and did I mention that I keep a good bar? :)

knownothing
Offline
Joined: Mar 24 2011

Sorry I don't drink.


Coldwell
Offline
Joined: Jun 14 2011

Good news! The preamble has miraculously re-appeared:

http://xfer.ndp.ca/2011/2011-constitution/2011-11-CONSTITUTION-ENG.pdf

 


knownothing
Offline
Joined: Mar 24 2011

All right! Thank you whoever is in charge of that!


M. Spector
Offline
Joined: Feb 19 2005

The word "socialism" may be back in the preamble, but it's not really a part of the party itself.

James Laxer on rabble.ca wrote:

The NDP has evolved into a party much like the others. There is little political ferment. Riding association meetings, party conferences and provincial and federal conventions are not occasions for basic debate and education about the state of society and what needs to be done, but rather focus on fundraising, holding raffles and showcasing the leader for the media. The only time when there is genuine democracy in the NDP is during leadership campaigns. At least during these intervals, real debate becomes possible. Once the leader is chosen, however, party policy, decided on at conventions, is ignored. That has been the case for decades. Between leadership campaigns, the leader, surrounded by his or her inner staff and pollsters, determines the political course of the party.

The campaigns of the party establishment to replace the Regina Manifesto with the Winnipeg Declaration in 1956 (which effectively replaced socialism with the humanization of capitalism as the party's objective), to suppress the Waffle in the early 1970s (to eliminate a grassroots movement that sought to move the party to the left) and to contain the New Politics Initiative a number of years ago were episodes in a decades-old effort to make vote-winning the paramount, almost exclusive, legitimate activity of the party.


kropotkin1951
Online
Joined: Jun 6 2002

Bump

Since this topic came up in NDP-15 I thought I should bump this thread up.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or register to post comments