babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.
Robocalls Scandal Thread #2 - Now up to 34 ridings
Do you really think this ends with the Sun? It'll be twittered, blogged, one person already mentioned the same basic option was expressed. Of course logically this shouldn't free the Tories on the robocalls, and legally it may not, but it does mean the liberals will gain little and it breaks thier momentum.
If Turmel is smart it does free up room to take the lead this issue, so maybe the, Tories will get theirs still, I hope so, but,liberals will not benifit from it like they were doing.
I'll be delighted and probably hallucinate pigs flying if Turmel or the NDP are able to keep robocalls in the news. You just be happy Harpers being let off and enjoy your deomcracy.
57 ridings! I am sure the Cons recognise the implications of this, and I think we can expect even more stone-walling in Question Period. This will not go away any time soon. More popcorn!!!
...which is unfortunate. If you cheat only say one question out of 10 on a university exam and answer the other nine "honestly" you get a grade of ZERO on the whole thing, not just on the section you cheated on.
It's not mentioned in this article, but I've also heard that professors who want to actually enforce those supposed "zero tolerance" cheating policies and give zeroes for cheating are often overruled by higher-ups in order for the program or university to keep their rates of retention as high as possible. Or, because their careers are so dependent on student evaluations, they know they'll get panned if they go after students who cheat.
This professor says it's not worth going after cheaters.
I was all set to write a strongly worded letter to my MP urging him to add his voice to the howls of parliamentary outrage surrounding this latest example of corruption in politics. It was at the point when I remembered he's a Liberal that all motivation evaporated.
As for the apparent glee of some as they embrace the disinformation? what they imagine as the sweet whiff of political advantage is actually the rotting corpse of democracy. Enjoy.
As for the apparent glee of some as they embrace the disinformation? what they imagine as the sweet whiff of political advantage is actually the rotting corpse of democracy. Enjoy.
Defeated Liberal takes rare court action to contest election results
57 ridings
57 ridings! I am sure the Cons recognise the implications of this, and I think we can expect even more stone-walling in Question Period. This will not go away any time soon. More popcorn!!!
Well, actually, not really.
It's not mentioned in this article, but I've also heard that professors who want to actually enforce those supposed "zero tolerance" cheating policies and give zeroes for cheating are often overruled by higher-ups in order for the program or university to keep their rates of retention as high as possible. Or, because their careers are so dependent on student evaluations, they know they'll get panned if they go after students who cheat.
This professor says it's not worth going after cheaters.
Jebus. I really hope this isn't going to be the Dipper line on this. Because that's appalling.
One consistent feature I have noticed about how people react to allegations:
The innocent say 'I didn't do it!'.
The guilty say 'Prove it!'
'Nuff said!
I was all set to write a strongly worded letter to my MP urging him to add his voice to the howls of parliamentary outrage surrounding this latest example of corruption in politics. It was at the point when I remembered he's a Liberal that all motivation evaporated.
Write that song Buddy! It nails how things actually are..
Well said.
Beautifully said, actually.
Thank you!
CFL