babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.
There's eight here... maybe the cartoon was drawn a little while ago? Presumably Ashton and Nash are the women with and without glasses respectively. Paul Dewar is recognizable on the right, and Singh on the left. And I guess the bald guy is Cullen? But none of the others particularly look like Mulcair, Saganash or Topp. The guy between Cullen and Singh looks more like Ron Paul.
Thanks for all your comments on the impersonations...! It was fun to do, even if I had a pang about a couple of them. Felt quite mean towards Brian Topp.... :-( .... but then I reviewed his performance on some CTV interview a short while back, and felt it was painfully accurate....!
Well my initial post did specify that "was-supposed-to-be-funny" is also fair game for this thread. So thanks for posting, because we don't always get a chance to see this stuff.
Well my initial post did specify that "was-supposed-to-be-funny" is also fair game for this thread. So thanks for posting, because we don't always get a chance to see this stuff.
Man, it's like being rickrolled. The thread title says "Comedy and the NDP leadership race" so I think I'm going to see a collection of comedy clips about the NDP leadership race - and the majority of the posts in it turn out to be a clone of the punditry already happening in the neverending NDP leadership race threads. ;)
I watched the Rick's Rant, the first one Michelle. I personally didn't find it very funny it even felt 'forced'. I guess I don't believe a leadership competition has to be like some kind of choreographed drama designed to draw in voter interest like an insecure actor, waving his hands. Did you notice by the way how much Mercer physically moves - the hand waving?
It is Mercer's job to entertain, or educate me, with irony and the like, and he did neither. I didn't find him engaging except in the same way someone finds the three stooges engaging, but Mercer has 1/5 the talent of those three - for me, he's a famous guy wearing expensive clothes, entering the camera view in a carefully choreographed manner, against a graffiti 'everyman' backdrop in the inner city (for effect), practicing hand movements and polite hystrionics. If this weren't a Canadian I think people would be saying Who is this glib nobody with no talent for comedy writing?
No wonder they had to use a laugh track. If he presented that in Vegas he'd get boo'd, it is just plain poor comedy writing. And the last line "If you can't engage voters, you don't deserve voters" I'd be interested to hear what others think of this remark. It reminds me of poor teachers in school who resorted to entertainment in an effort to reach the students who didn't give a damn.
The 22 Minutes segment was fun. The writing was a little better, and even if the people weren't themselves actors, the stiff host with his own agenda and odd, rude manner was amusing - PN was great MS had a laugh, and the Mulcair pieces were great - I could tell his mouth was actually readying to speak as the announcer cut him off, it was priceless.
I submit if Mercer knew anything at all about the NDP, he'd know the NDP engages people by listening to people. Like activists, ffs, and not pepper spraying them in the face. If I'm missing Mercer's ironic intent, please tell me. I don't feel it.
AFAIK Mercer doesn't use a laugh track for the rants - they play the tape in front of the same live audience that comes for the filming, who laugh/applaud on cue, and record that into the final broadcast. At least that's what they did the time I once saw Mercer in the first few seasons of the show.
I find Rick Mercer to be a completely unfunny, self-aggrandizing, pompous knob, unlike the show which he left, which continues on occasion to be funny and engaging.
What's the difference between using a laugh track and using a live audience that laughs and applauds on cue?
Nothing.
When I was a kid, it was the golden age of laugh-tracks on the sitcoms down here. I always wondered what the increbidly funny stuff was that the canned laughter audience was listening to.
I find Rick Mercer to be a completely unfunny, self-aggrandizing, pompous knob, unlike the show which he left, which continues on occasion to be funny and engaging.
Me too. I just watched the RMR Fourth Ballot Deodorant video clip thanks Lefty here and again, the guy just isn't a funny comedian - he tries with costume in this one and a hair do, but his humour in this one just strikes me as glib and stupid, there's no theme except for his silly personal stereotypes on what NDPers 'must be' like.
Now the 'nom nom nom' piece, that was funny - it was quiet and understated like the sound of chewing maybe, I mean it accomplishes so much with so little it's awesome.
I stopped watching Rick Mercer's supposedly "comedic" pieces about the NDP after this clip. Not so much because it hit me where it hurt--although it did--but because there wasn't anything even slightly true about it, which would have been the only thing that would have made it remotely funny.
Even worse, there were so many missed bets if you really wanted to do a comedy bit about Rahim Jaffer's loss! Being a comedian, which of the following spins would you put on that story?
1. Rahim Jaffer gives his victory speech, then finds out he actually lost and hides in the kitchen for an hour!
2. Rahim Jaffer is so despondent over his loss that he gets married the day after the election without telling his parents first, and then talks about how he did it because his new wife had "caught him in a weak moment"!
3. Rahim Jaffer is beaten by a lightweight who didn't work very hard for it!
IP, I never saw that clip before and must have missed that one. But you are so right - he used "her" to get at "him" - the different ways one could have "read" what Rick was trying to suggest is low and cheap.
You may find yourself asking "who is this NDP, and why should they threaten me?" Until very recently, the NDP has been a fringe group of radicals, known for occasionally electing a Member of Parliament. They like to claim responsibility for some of the most horrific and devastating public policy decisions in Canadian history, such as the socializing of medicine, or the Canadarm.
No doubt due to my high-profile in the Cat Journalism community, I received an anonymous tip that this shady faction would be meeting to name their next leader. I approached the editors at Rabble, who were as surprised as I was that the group was still active. After all, we know that Canadians stand proudly behind the balanced and fair decisions of our Prime Minister. Only enviro-union-separatists backed by foreign interests would dare question his flawless leadership.
I like all the Mercer clips, but the Jaffer-Duncan one, while it would be funny if Duncan really was a name-on-the-ballot-only like many of the NDP MPs who got elected in Quebec, is just factually incorrect, and therefore misses the "funny" mark to anyone who knows that she actually campaigned like hell and was no paper-only candidate.
In fact, I'd even say that it is sexist - showing a picture of the female winner and joking that she filled out a card at the shopping mall and was told she won.
I don't discount his other videos, though, because of it. I thought the Fourth Ballot Deodorant one was great.
The Cat Reporter thing sounds like it has the potential to be funny, Catchfire. :) radiorahim and I always joke that if cats could vote (especially OUR cat), they'd vote Conservative.
Thanks! The guy is a great comic. I laughed so much. Polygonic for PM!
Singh looks like a Cossack, for some reason.
I think the guy kneeling is Mulcair. He seems to have a beard and is stockier than Singh.
hitler meme hits the topp campaign http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtU_898DyhA
that hitler video is pretty funny.
As I said a while back, the Downfall meme never gets old. :D I guess the Mulcair campaign has figured that out too! Funny video.
Gives you an idea how the candidates are viewed in QC:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P44jGYM27Pw
(6:20)
Disgusting and not amusing. And your comment is nonsense.
actually, aside from the part about nicky ashton, that info man video is hilarious. the brian topp clip had me spit out my tea.
But the Brian Topp clip was real, and it was simply embarrassing when I saw him say that in real time. True, I wasn't drinking tea at the time...
Well done polygonic! I enjoyed all of them.
Well my initial post did specify that "was-supposed-to-be-funny" is also fair game for this thread. So thanks for posting, because we don't always get a chance to see this stuff.
Well my initial post did specify that "was-supposed-to-be-funny" is also fair game for this thread. So thanks for posting, because we don't always get a chance to see this stuff.
I watched the Rick's Rant, the first one Michelle. I personally didn't find it very funny it even felt 'forced'. I guess I don't believe a leadership competition has to be like some kind of choreographed drama designed to draw in voter interest like an insecure actor, waving his hands. Did you notice by the way how much Mercer physically moves - the hand waving?
It is Mercer's job to entertain, or educate me, with irony and the like, and he did neither. I didn't find him engaging except in the same way someone finds the three stooges engaging, but Mercer has 1/5 the talent of those three - for me, he's a famous guy wearing expensive clothes, entering the camera view in a carefully choreographed manner, against a graffiti 'everyman' backdrop in the inner city (for effect), practicing hand movements and polite hystrionics. If this weren't a Canadian I think people would be saying Who is this glib nobody with no talent for comedy writing?
No wonder they had to use a laugh track. If he presented that in Vegas he'd get boo'd, it is just plain poor comedy writing. And the last line "If you can't engage voters, you don't deserve voters" I'd be interested to hear what others think of this remark. It reminds me of poor teachers in school who resorted to entertainment in an effort to reach the students who didn't give a damn.
The 22 Minutes segment was fun. The writing was a little better, and even if the people weren't themselves actors, the stiff host with his own agenda and odd, rude manner was amusing - PN was great MS had a laugh, and the Mulcair pieces were great - I could tell his mouth was actually readying to speak as the announcer cut him off, it was priceless.
I submit if Mercer knew anything at all about the NDP, he'd know the NDP engages people by listening to people. Like activists, ffs, and not pepper spraying them in the face. If I'm missing Mercer's ironic intent, please tell me. I don't feel it.
AFAIK Mercer doesn't use a laugh track for the rants - they play the tape in front of the same live audience that comes for the filming, who laugh/applaud on cue, and record that into the final broadcast. At least that's what they did the time I once saw Mercer in the first few seasons of the show.
What's the difference between using a laugh track and using a live audience that laughs and applauds on cue?
Nothing.
I find Rick Mercer to be a completely unfunny, self-aggrandizing, pompous knob, unlike the show which he left, which continues on occasion to be funny and engaging.
When I was a kid, it was the golden age of laugh-tracks on the sitcoms down here. I always wondered what the increbidly funny stuff was that the canned laughter audience was listening to.
Nom nom nom...you don't mind if I eat while you talk, do you?
BAHAHAHA
Here's an old song (circa 1795) for the convention.
Fourth Ballot Deodorant (RMR)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lx0u1y_bgyk
Me too. I just watched the RMR Fourth Ballot Deodorant video clip thanks Lefty here and again, the guy just isn't a funny comedian - he tries with costume in this one and a hair do, but his humour in this one just strikes me as glib and stupid, there's no theme except for his silly personal stereotypes on what NDPers 'must be' like.
Now the 'nom nom nom' piece, that was funny - it was quiet and understated like the sound of chewing maybe, I mean it accomplishes so much with so little it's awesome.
I stopped watching Rick Mercer's supposedly "comedic" pieces about the NDP after this clip. Not so much because it hit me where it hurt--although it did--but because there wasn't anything even slightly true about it, which would have been the only thing that would have made it remotely funny.
Even worse, there were so many missed bets if you really wanted to do a comedy bit about Rahim Jaffer's loss! Being a comedian, which of the following spins would you put on that story?
1. Rahim Jaffer gives his victory speech, then finds out he actually lost and hides in the kitchen for an hour!
2. Rahim Jaffer is so despondent over his loss that he gets married the day after the election without telling his parents first, and then talks about how he did it because his new wife had "caught him in a weak moment"!
3. Rahim Jaffer is beaten by a lightweight who didn't work very hard for it!
Only Rick Mercer would pick option three.
IP, I never saw that clip before and must have missed that one. But you are so right - he used "her" to get at "him" - the different ways one could have "read" what Rick was trying to suggest is low and cheap.
In search of the Cat Truth at the NDP leadership conventionI like all the Mercer clips, but the Jaffer-Duncan one, while it would be funny if Duncan really was a name-on-the-ballot-only like many of the NDP MPs who got elected in Quebec, is just factually incorrect, and therefore misses the "funny" mark to anyone who knows that she actually campaigned like hell and was no paper-only candidate.
In fact, I'd even say that it is sexist - showing a picture of the female winner and joking that she filled out a card at the shopping mall and was told she won.
I don't discount his other videos, though, because of it. I thought the Fourth Ballot Deodorant one was great.
The Cat Reporter thing sounds like it has the potential to be funny, Catchfire. :) radiorahim and I always joke that if cats could vote (especially OUR cat), they'd vote Conservative.
Aaaand one more for the road...