babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.
Support rabble | Advertise with us | Contact our staff | About rabble | Log-in or Register for a new account | Corrections | Privacy policy | Newsfeeds | Mailing lists
rabble: Features | Columnists | In Cahoots | Blogs | Books | Photos | What's Up | Polls
babble: Forum Topics | Active Topics
The rpn: About the RPN | Become a podcaster
rabbleTV: Program Guide | Features | Indie Inside | Best of the net
Copyright © 2001-2013 the authors
Syndicate
Increase the youth vote. There are a LOT of new voters who will come of age by 2015. When the House isn't in session, send a bunch of young NDP MPs (from all over the country) on a speaking tour. Engage an entire generation who has, by default, been left out of the conversation.
A cadillac in every driveway, a chicken in every pot...
Mulcair's against that until there are more studies done on the pot's potency
I believe the two oldest parties and their having tied Canada's economic wagon of fortunes to a basket case economy south of us are helping to do the job for us. They are offering nothing to voters except austerity and more bad economies.
We actually have help from the enemy. It's like having a "third way" fist working for us in a boxing match. They are beating themselves and handing momentum to the NDP.
Yes, we just have to sit back, fold our arms, and watch the masses rally around our flag!
Who ever said politics was hard work?
They used to deliver a bit of prosperity during the cold war era. It's gone, and so are they losing momentum.
It's not, actually. FPTP is not about democratic populism as you seem to believe. Have a gander at some of the threads on our still currently obsolete electoral system.
We could promise the world, and there will still be millions of non-voters and disaffected and jaded voters in Ontario. They have been used and disabused from voting regardless. FPTP is about learned helplessness as well as numerically eliminating millions of votes long before they are cast.
Where the hard work comes into play is having a sufficiently filled to brimming campaign war chest to win targeted ridings. And proper targeting of potential swing ridings is important, too. We have to think like German field generals during WW II with their rapid mobilizations and three-pronged punch attacks against superior numbers. Sad but true.
You are dead wrong here. All media besides the Sun news network are Liberal biased. The reason there is no pro NDP news is because until the last election, they were considered too left. Which they are. They have no real ideas of their own, so nobody knows what the stand for.
This will be true once again in 2015, after they lose the majority of their seats due to Layton being dead. Also people will more than likely not throw their votes away with the NDP, as they did last time. We have seen what happens if you rig elections with vote swaping and such, nobody actually thought the NDP would actually win that many seats. i bet the majority of those who did toss their votes away to the NDP wish they had have just voted as they usually did, with the Liberals.
Sorry folks, but we are going to see an even stronger majority CPC govt in 2015. Bring it on!
jdman, I hope people in the CPC keep thinking like you, because then it will come as a complete shock when we win, as you seem to have ignored all the warning signs.
Unfortunately (for me), I think most in the Conservative war room are much more acutely aware than you are of the still emerging shift in Canadian politics that now frames the NDP as their main competition for government.
There is no shift, as you put it. It was a scam. Wait and see. Hell even the green party won a seat. There is a first for everything, but that does not mean anything. Just bizarro luck.
Ooooookay.
Fortunately, the Canadian voting public are not wilful idiots as you seem to take glee in asserting. Contrary to what you may believe, they knew exactly who they were voting for and why, and that doesn't constitute "bizarro luck".
By your logic (or in this case anything but), Harper's majority with a minority of the votes was also an instance of "bizarro luck", and indicates nothing at all. You can't have it both ways.
Last time I reply to a "joined today troll".
Mmmkkkkk.... if you insist on going there. How about Mulclairs overwhelming support of what was it???25% of the 50% of the NDP who actually decided to vote for any candadate at all?
Thanks for the troll comment. Made me laugh.
Nobody wants to go there??? Bueller, Bueller, Bueller????
There seems to be a bit of a "time lag" in Ontario and in order for the NDP to win in Ontario they'll have to squeeze down the Liberal vote further. It will have to become clear to Ontarians that the NDP is THE opposition party and that Mulcair and the NDP are the "new Liberals."
The NDP already made major inroads in the GTA - and I can't see why they can't sweep Scarborough, expand from their Bramalea-Gore-Malton base to other Brampton seats, and seats like Mississauga East-Cooksville, Ajax-Pickering, etc. After all they win these types of suburban seats in Greater Vancouver.
Of course there is a more principled approach and taking the hard road to power by genuinely changing people's ideological perceptions - but I don't think the "modern" NDP is up for the task. Thus they're going to pursue the "new Liberals" approach.
why not form another coalition with the liberals then? I mean if you already consider yourselves the "new liberals", seems like the move to make.That way, you would have their votes, plus the NDP. Sure to be a solid choice in the 2015 election.
Ideologically - with the Liberals led by an ex-NDPer and the NDP lead by an ex-Liberal - it makes sense at this point (though I wouldn't be part of it), but the Liberal "brand" may be so tainted at this point that it makes more sense for the NDP to just klll off the Liberals in 2015 (or for the LPC to fold up).
There is really one LPC constituency now - affluent urban professionals who are too educated to vote Tory and too rich to vote NDP.
Ontario just has to realize why the jobs are disappearing: a raw deal on globalization and trade, and the dutch disease.
If they realize that we're competing with countries who have horrifying labor and environmental standards -- and that it's starting to affect even white collar service and technology professions -- they'll vote NDP.
If they realize that the quick oil money from foreign investors is sending our dollar so high that our value-added exports are uncompetitive, they'll vote NDP.
If they keep thinking that it's good economic policy to sell off non-renewable resources for quick cash as fast as possible, and that those manufacturing jobs will just magically come back by slashing social security, they'll vote for the Conservatives.
I don't think so. And I don't think it's necessary to embark on ideological instruction, either.
The NDP are now the anti-Conservative choice for government. That wasn't evident to enough voters in the dying days last election. Only in that sense has the party become the "new Liberals."
To me, the NDP needs to stop trying to nannystate everyone, and mind their own business. Take the gun registry for example.
Mulcair says he will reinstate a defunct program, that has zero net gain, and costs billions the first time round....He has no problem continuing to throw good money at bad.
The majority of canadians like individual freedoms, and dont like red tape. as well people who work damn hard for their money, are tired of seeing useless drug addicts lining up to collect welfare, month after month. Never with any sort of drug screeening process. However if i want to work in the oil patch, i will be required to take a piss test.
I refuse to work for any business that will require me to piss in a cup for work. Thus why i stay in BC, make a decent wage, although nothing like i would be making in AB.
I have never had any issue keeping, or finding a job. If you, or you, or you, are....Find a new job that is in demand, or get out of the way and stop bitching about how ou are out of work.
If you truely cared to find work, you would put out the joint, grasp the fact that "occupy" protests, are not paying the bills.
I dont feel sorry for any single person who says they cant find work. It is BS. You are lazy.
Howard wrote:
A cadillac in every driveway
and a car elevator to go with it.
Right...because the average 416/905 voter is going to vote Tory just to stop the NDP from bringing back the gun registry. This issue has the power to sway the vote in perhaps 85 ridings in the country:
75 of them are in Québec, and to them the gun registry represents a valued response to the Montréal massacre.
The other 10 are yellow-dog Tory ridings on the Prairies.
Tom responded honestly and frankly to a direct question put to him on TLMEP. He said IF the Party (not him) put the registry in the platform for 2015, he would whip the vote.
Give your head a shake!
I don't think the long gun registry is a losing issue per se. Those police forces in the GTA (ridings that are key to Harper's majority) all largely support gun controls because it makes it easier to deal with gun violence.
But I think we can monitor guns without hurting responsible gun owners. Yeah, we don't have a constitutional right to own guns. But guns are still a passtime for many and a necessity for some. This issue isn't nearly as important as the rising unemployment and shrinking opportunity in the Harper economy. We ought to be able to find middle ground on guns, for the sake of moving onto more critical issues.
Sorry but the NDP will not win government, or even have a chance at it by using the Liberal langauge of the gun registry. There are ways to approach gun control without opening up the wedge politics of Liberals and Conservatives. Your numbers portray an ignorance of many, many ridings in Canada, and in places like southwestern Ontario where the NDP must win seats to compete.
I agree that going after guns in that way were a big-L liberal idea. A lot of working people are comfortable around guns and use them responsibly. The registry starts fails to acknowledge that premise. I remain hopeful that there's some kind of alternative between scrapping the registry versus restoring it.
I can't disagree. I think dropping the registry is preferable to bringing it back fully. Some gun controls would be a good thing, and even a decent alternative to the registry. But seeing as crime is down anyway, it's not worth making guns into an issue.
Word of mouth: NDP English ads debuted tonight on the Jays home opener.
IMO, a smart buy.
I would say the Gun registry issue is an urban rural wedge issue.... I think the solution would be to let that issue drop and focus on jobs, jobs, jobs....
...just pure Politics wise...it hurts the NDP in rural Ontario ..... and and the rest of rural Canada...Harper knows this .......he has made tons of $$$ from it fundraising wise in the past....he would love the NDP to keep helping him in this way....
Setting aside the Public Policy issue
Didn't catch it. Does it follow this script:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/03/26/pol-ndp-ads.html
?