babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.
Support rabble | Advertise with us | Contact our staff | About rabble | Log-in or Register for a new account | Corrections | Privacy policy | Newsfeeds | Mailing lists
rabble: Features | Columnists | In Cahoots | Blogs | Books | Photos | What's Up | Polls
babble: Forum Topics | Active Topics
The rpn: About the RPN | Become a podcaster
rabbleTV: Program Guide | Features | Indie Inside | Best of the net
Copyright © 2001-2013 the authors
Syndicate
quote:
"One important difference - Environics polled 'likely voters' as opposed to everyone. About 60% of Albertans didn't cast a ballot in the last election. The idea of polling likely voters seems logical to me, but I'm not convinced pollsters have figured out a good way to truthfully figure out which voters are in fact, likely to cast ballots."
One couldn't try controlling for the variables of socio-economic status and age?
Please encourage them to set up a party in BC as well, as there has to be a split in the right-wing vote for the BC NDP to win.
Trying to find threads from the last Alberta provincial election and I found this little beauty hidden away on page 9!
Guess the OP can rule out the "flash in the pan" theory.