9/11 Reports 2
The United States has formally sent to trial Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, alleged Pakistani mastermind of 9/11 terror attacks, along with four other suspected al Qaeda militants involved in its planning.
They could face the death penalty if found guilty. The five Guantanamo Bay inmates will be tried by a military commission on charges including terrorism, hijacking, conspiracy, murder and destruction of property, the Pentagon said Wednesday.
"If found guilty"? lol! Well sure the inquisition will find them guilty. It's a forgone conclusion. What other verdict would a kangaroo court produce?
911 The Terrorism Trump Card - by Brian Burchill
"The time is long overdue for investigative journalists to challenge such references to unsubstantiated terrorism. They can do so with confidence by becoming knowledgeable about the growing body of evidence refuting the official claims about the growing body of evidence refuting the official claims about the events of 9/11.."
In a January 18th interview, Prime Minister Stephen Harper told Mansbridge that he thinks that "the evidence is...overwhelming" and that it "is just beyond dispute at this point" that Iran's purpose is to develop nuclear weapons. When pressed about Iran's insistence that it has no intention to build nuclear weapons, Harper said "I think there is absolutely no doubt they are lying".2
Harper's claims are all-too-reminiscent of US Former Secretary of State Colin Powell's February, 2003, statement at the UN that, with "facts and conclusions based on solid intelligence",3 there was no doubt in his mind that Saddam Hussein was working to obtain key components to produce nuclear weapons.
Harper is a vicious, vicious toadie. Intelligence? Like yellowcake, aluminum tubes and biological WMD that Iraq was supposed to have?
Our snivelleing, grovelling obedient lapdog in phony-majority government will say anything for a pat on the head and a good boy biscuit.
Harper is an embarrassing embarrassment to all Canadians. It's shameful. Harper is a national disgrace.
Debate on '9/11, False Flags and Black Ops' with Jonathan Kay and Webster Tarpley (and vid)
"with David Frum, Jonathan Kay and Webster Tarpley. This debate is especially relevent coming as it does as the little Ribbentrops of the NATO foreign ministeries escalate their campaign for a near-term attack on Syria and/or Iran.."
Author Jonathan Kay is an embarrassment to the very idea of investigative news journalism. He posits that because General Smedley Butler was able to blow the whistle on a fascist conspiracy to overthrow the FDR government in the 1930's due to independent news media operating freely in America, the same news media is present to accommodate whistleblowers today.
Watergate was leaked by the media, so therefore any 9/11 government conspiracy would necessarily also be leaked to and by the news media.
But Kay makes no mention of the increase in concentration of news media in the hands of a few in the 30 or so years between Watergate and 9/11. He neglected to mention that thousands of news media corporations in America would eventually be owned by five largest corporate owners by the 1990s. Just five. Wouldn't it be easier to control the news and therefore what Americans are thinking with such high concentration of ownership of the news media?
In fact Jon Kay neglects to mention that Adam Smith and Karl Marx were among the first to point out the fact that capitalists conspire to rig markets in their favour. Monopoly capitalism is a real conspiracy. The goal for every capitalist is to eliminate the competition. One former visiting Soviet dignitary asked his American hosts how US news media could be forced to all report nearly exactly the same news stories as if on queue. The Soviet dignitary said that it was remarkable because in the USSR the state had to threaten their news journalists to achieve similar results.
CIA: We can't release the photos because they are fakes, and truthers would only point out that the photos were photoshop'd, like all of the forged photos and fake film footage of Elvis bin Laden before.
In Libya and Syria, Al Qaeda brigades are the foot soldiers of the US-NATO military alliance. Wherever the US military and intelligence apparatus is deployed, Al Qaeda is present:
Al Qaeda in Iraq, Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), the Libya Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), Al Shaabab (Somalia), Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, Jaish-e-Mohammed (JEM) (Army of Mohammed) (Pakistan), Jemaah Islamiya organization (JI) (Indonesia) Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, etc. (See US State Department Foreign Terrorist Organizations, United Nations Security Council, List of individuals, groups, undertakings and other entities associated with Al-Qaida Al-Qaida Sanctions List)
In a bitter irony, in all these countries, US intelligence is covertly coordinating the activities of Al Qaeda affiliated groups. Officially counterterrorism consists in fighting the "Islamic jihad" Unofficially through covert operations, Western intelligence supports their "assets" including terror entities on the US State Department list.
Moreover, these various terrorist organizations are now being used in US-NATO covert military operations against sovereign countries (e.g. Libya and Syria). According to Israeli intelligence sources:
"NATO headquarters in Brussels and the Turkish high command are meanwhile drawing up plans for their first military step in Syria, which is to arm the rebels with weapons for combating the tanks and helicopters spearheading the Assad regime's crackdown on dissent. Instead of repeating the Libyan model of air strikes, NATO strategists are thinking more in terms of pouring large quantities of anti-tank and anti-air rockets, mortars and heavy machine guns into the protest centers for beating back the government armored forces."(DEBKAfile, NATO to give rebels anti-tank weapons, August 14, 2011)
Obama vs Romney with Al-CIA'duh running the fear factor.
We were initially led to believe that Obama and other members of his administration personally watched bin Laden's killing. White House "situation room" photos featured an apparently shocked Hillary Clinton seemingly watching events live - even though it was subsequently admitted by CIA director Leon Panetta that there had been no live feed during the raid. Several other significant revisions were made to the original account of the raid...
The legend of Elvis bin Laden lives on.
On May 8, The New York Times headlined "Rare Double Agent Disrupted Bombing Plot, US says."
Most likely it's double-dealing official lies and misreporting. According to Times-speak, a Saudi intelligence agent "infiltrated (a) terrorist group and volunteered for the mission, American and foreign officials said Tuesday."
Washington claims he provided an "innovative bomb" designed for "aviation attack." The Times reported the story without checking for reliability. If official sources say it, accounts follow true or false.
The agent is back in Saudi Arabia, The Times said. CIA agents were involved.
What's true or false isn't clear. What's certain is another false flag for reasons similar to previous ones. They repeat well-timed for strategic advantage.
They're manufactured to look real. Media scoundrels headline them. Most people don't know they've been had. The scam repeats because it works. No wonder America gets away with murder and much more.
We are at War
against International Terrorism,
defending our Values
and our Civilization.
Iran Accused of Being Behind 9/11 Attacks - by Julie Levesque
"The US court judgment issued Dec 2011 (Havlish v Iran) which blames the Iran government for the 9/11 attacks is part of the propaganda ploy, which consists of demonizing the Islamic Republic of Iran...
also info at #22
That's a very good essay by Julie Levesque. The serial fabricators are at it again.
What happened to Ibn al-Sheikh al-Libi? 2009 Fabricated evidence for Iraqi ties to "Al-Qa'eda" or Dead men tell no tales.
It was announced after the NATO-Qa'eda joint invasion and takeover of Libya that Gadaffi was collaborating with the American CIA in torturing prisoners. Gadafi was apparently a partner in the phony war on terror. I think the former Gadaffi realized too late that it is a phony war, and that it was really Al-CIA'da attempting to assassinate him in the late 2000's.
If there were any real terrorists, Jose Rodriguez would be dead.
Who is Jose Rodriguez? He is the criminal who ran the CIA torture program. Most of his victims were not terrorists or even insurgents. Most were hapless individuals kidnapped by warlords and sold to the Americans as "terrorists" for the bounty paid.
If Rodriguez's identity was previously a secret, it is no more. He has been on CBS "60 Minutes" taking credit for torturing Muslims and using the information allegedly gained to kill leaders of al Qaeda. If terrorists were really the problem that Homeland Security, the FBI and CIA claim, Rodriguez's name would be a struck through item on the terrorists' hit list. He would be in his grave.
"Al-Qa'eda" apparently uninterested in gaining revenge on numerous NeoCon crusader terrorists and most of them sitting ducks, which would be unlike their repeated attempts to off Fidel who they tried to murder more than 600 times since the 1950's. But Al-CIA'da did succeed with Gadafi and a number of others, yes they did. So they are not total incompetents in the end.
What is important is that something is done soon to launch another U.S. inquiry into the event, this time an impartial inquiry.
Certain retired CIA and national intelligence officers(US cold warriors) agree and disagree. They say the 9/11 report is a joke, and that unlike the Nuremberg trials for prosecuting WW II era war criminals, any new investigation and trial should be done outside the USA in a World Court of Law.
In this case the war criminals in cosmetic US Government, DoD, and clandestine services would never allow a legitimate investigation much less incriminate themselves in anything resembling proceedings recognized by the rest of the world as being legal and legitimate. Any new legal panel and team of prosecutors has to have teeth with authority to prosecute, subpoena powers and international recognition. No more hiding evidence and guilt behind a veil of secrecy referred to as US "national security." National security just means whatever in hell they want it to mean, like medieval inquisitions of bygone times. The military inquisitions are so illegit and so laughable that they have avoided trying the lastest 9/11 "masterminds" in kangaroo courts at Guantanamo Nazi Germany style. First it was Elvis bin Laden, and now the latest patsy is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who fought for the CIA in 1980s Afghanistan. More lies to cover-up previous fiction and so on.
"Al-Qa'eda" was created by the bipartisan war party comprised of two right wings and is responsible for the ongoing cover-up of their own conspiracy to fund and support terrorism in Central Asia, the Middle East, North Africa and beyond. The never ending global war on terror is based on lies and deception. One of their own CIA officials in Turkey said Elvis bin Laden died in 2006 while fighting another of their dirty wars, and by that time in Chechnya. They've told so many lies to the public that they are no longer capable of telling the truth. They are pathological liars and so corrupt that they are above the laws of the former United States of America.
...any new investigation and trial should be done outside the USA in a World Court of Law.
Those efforts wouldn't be very effective in getting to the truth and prosecuting those who broke U.S. law.
There is no real U.S. Law anymore. SCO countries and the rest of world see the US as a lawless and corrupt nation since 9/11 and the decade of war crimes, Wall St bank heists etc. The oligarchs are sacking and looting Rome themselves while there is still time.
They've violated Geneva conventions and international law since Nuremberg. The world would never have known about Himmler's false flag terrorism namely the the Gleiwitz incident if it hadn't been for a war crimes tribunal outside the influence and control of Nazi Germany.
They could add 9/11 shutzstaffel copy-cat terror to a long list of war crimes perpetrated by neocons("Liberal democrats" and Republicans on the same team and who who collaborated in creating"Al-Qa'eda" and Taliban since propping-up mujahideen terror with billions of taxpayer dollars in the 1980s) who continue using false pretexts to wage a phony global war on terror.
Neocons and their friendlies are still funding the spread of right wing militant Islam in Asia and Africa, "the Middle East" etc.
Prescott Bush's grandson & Two Chickenhawks convicted of war crimes by tribunal It's a start and part of the historical record. How very brave they are.
Abby Martin and Sibel Edmonds on RT TV (911blogger.com)
She is a very clever woman indeed. Sibel Edmonds and a number of courageous women very important anti-imperialists fighting for the truth today, They are fighting to reclaim noble concepts, like freedom, liberty and democracy. They fight the good fight on behalf of all of us in a war being waged against all of us.
Well that does it! This is proof positive that the Muslim Brotherhood must necessarily be anti-imperialists all. It's either that or they've realized they are short on anti-imperialist cred.