babble-intro-img
babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.

9/11 Reports 2

166 replies [Last post]

Comments

NDPP
Offline
Joined: Dec 27 2008

Insider Trading 9/11: The Facts Laid Bare  - by Lars Schell

http://atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/NC21Dj05.html

"Is there any truth in the allegations that informed circles made substantial profits in the financial markets in connection to the terror attacks of September 11, 2001, on the United States?

'Examination of the option trading leading up to September 11 reveals that there was an unusually high level of put buying. This finding is consistent with informed investors having traded options in advance of the attacks...'


jas
Offline
Joined: Jun 6 2005

Fidel wrote:

Canadian Truth Tour 2012 1600 architects and engineers reveal what you are not being told about the destruction of 3 World Trade Centre buildings.

Further to that:

Blueprint for Truth presentation at University of Winnipeg

 


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

Well I will just have to give credit to former PM Paul Martin for stating that an investigation is needed if A&E's for truth have raised concerns. Martin did say, in 2008, that although explosives may have been used, it was obvious from what he saw on TV *something inaudible to me* and sounded like he said we saw the planes "doing that".  Doing what, Paul Martin? What did you see the planes doing?

I know what I saw. I saw two massive steel frame towers still standing after the impacts as they were designed to. And I neglected to see a single plane fly into 7WTC before that tower collapsed and after which there were reports describing a number of explosions. Apparently the gubmint guys weren't interested in what numerous eye witnesses to the events have to say. Because in their minds Occam's razor means to conjure up the weakest explanation defying accepted laws of nature and fob it off to the public.

How many criminal investigations begin and end with ignoring dozens of eye witness testimonies that don't jive with the official fairy tale?

The mother of all terrorist attacks as the genesis fable for globalizing liquid war today has been one long and ongoing cover-up.


mmphosis
Offline
Joined: Apr 28 2009

Fidel wrote:

Well I will just have to give credit to former PM Paul Martin for stating that an investigation is needed if A&E's for truth have raised concerns. Martin did say, in 2008, that although explosives may have been used, it was obvious from what he saw on TV *something inaudible to me* and sounded like he said we saw the planes "doing that".  Doing what, Paul Martin? What did you see the planes doing?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbDgSDTJv38

 


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

Thanks mmphosis. Apparently that is a different video with some of Martin's response cut off before the camera person was told by security people to stop asking difficult questions about the mother of all US Military Government black ops on 9/11.

And I still think whomever wrote the closed caption s/w for TubeYou should be lined up against a cement wall at dawn. Sorry but I just had to share that.


mmphosis
Offline
Joined: Apr 28 2009

Fidel wrote:

Thanks mmphosis. Apparently that is a different video with some of Martin's response cut off before the camera person was told by security people to stop asking difficult questions about the mother of all US Military Government black ops on 9/11.

The video I linked to was reportedly shot in Ottawa.  This one is from Halifax:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b44U0ePdPfQ

 

 


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

Well apparently I can't hear worth a darn. Because according the beta CC output Paul Martin jr aka Art Vandalay of Art Vandalay-Liberian Steamship Enterprises clearly said: "...once all those planes to him. And I think we all did/do."

I mean who in hell is Anders Bjorkman when we have steamship experts like Paul Martin commenting, really?

So there it is, Paul Martin Junior's expert opinion on how two planes demolished three trade centre buildings on 9/11. Eventually. Not right away but apparently the planes had very bad intentions which frightened the buildings so much that they collapsed some time later on in delayed reactions unique to steel frame buildings ablaze with sporadic, fuel-starved fires and only on 9/11/01.

We can still demand a real investigation according to the highly credentialed Martin. But there is no need to in his expert opinion as former leader of the Libranos and one-time obedient lapdog for Warshington. Because, and afterall, "once all those planes to him", which were all two of them that did what they did, it should  have been glaringly obvious to everyone. It's a slam dunk. Say no more. Hush-hush. And I think his handlers telling us to stop asking questions is proof positive that we are barking up the wrong tree with questioning the gaping holes in the 9/11 Commission Cover-up's findings.


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

Is the CIA already in your kitchen? By Judge Andrew Napolitano for Fox News (U.S.)

Yes apparently they are. And all of this government spying on the lives of Americans and Homeland stupidity has only cost taxpayers about $8 trillion dollars since 9/11. The truth is that their fear of ordinary Americans is the real reason for this Orwellian police state next door to Canada.


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

Al Qaeda, Al Qaeda, Al Qaeda.... An Incessant and Repetitive Public Discourse

Michel Chossudovsky wrote:
There is something disturbing in the nature of post 9/11 public discourse. Incessantly, on a daily basis, Al Qaeda is referred to by government officials, members of the US Congress, Wall Street analysts, etc. as an underlying cause of numerous World events. Occurences of a significant political, social or strategic nature --including the US presidential elections campaign-- are categorized by referring to Al Qaeda, the alleged architect of the September 11 2001 attacks.

What is striking is the extent of media coverage of "Al Qaeda related events", not to mention the mountains of op eds and authoritative "analysis" pertaining to "terror events" in different part of the World.

Routine mention of Al Qaeda "fanatics", "jihadists", etc. has become --from a news standpoint-- trendy and fashionable. A Worldwide ritual of authoritative media reporting has unfolded. At the time of writing (March 24, 2012), "Al Qaeda events" had 183 million entries on Google and 18,200 news entries.

A panoply of Al Qaeda related events and circumstances is presented to public opinion on a daily basis. These include terrorist threats, warnings and attacks, police investigations, insurgencies and counter-insurgencies, country-level regime change, social conflict, sectarian violence, racism, religious divisions, Islamic thought, Western values, etc.

In turn, Al Qaeda - War on Terrorism rhetoric permeates political discourse at all levels of government, including bipartisan debate on Capitol Hill, in committees of the House and the Senate, at the British House of Commons, and, lest we forget, at the United Nations Security Council.

All of these complex Al Qaeda related occurrences are explained --by politicians, the corporate media, Hollywood and the Washington think tanks under a single blanket "bad guys" heading, in which Al Qaeda is casually and repeatedly pinpointed as "the cause" of numerous terror events around the World. (SNIP)

Reagan and the Mujahideen

Quote:
Unknown to the American public, the US spread the teachings of the Islamic jihad in textbooks "Made in America", developed at the University of Nebraska:

  • the United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings, part of covert attempts to spur resistance to the Soviet occupation.

    The primers, which were filled with talk of jihad and featured drawings of guns, bullets, soldiers and mines, have served since then as the Afghan school system's core curriculum. Even the Taliban used the American-produced books,..

    The White House defends the religious content, saying that Islamic principles permeate Afghan culture and that the books "are fully in compliance with U.S. law and policy." Legal experts, however, question whether the books violate a constitutional ban on using tax dollars to promote religion.

  • AID officials said in interviews that they left the Islamic materials intact because they feared Afghan educators would reject books lacking a strong dose of Muslim thought. The agency removed its logo and any mention of the U.S. government from the religious texts, AID spokeswoman Kathryn Stratos said.

    "It's not AID's policy to support religious instruction," Stratos said. "But we went ahead with this project because the primary purpose

  • is to educate children, which is predominantly a secular activity."

  • Published in the dominant Afghan languages of Dari and Pashtun, the textbooks were developed in the early 1980s under an AID grant to the University of Nebraska -Omaha and its Center for Afghanistan Studies. The agency spent $ 51 million on the university's education programs in Afghanistan from 1984 to 1994." (Washington Post, 23 March 2002)

Did You Know: The King of Madrasas Now Operates Over 100 Charter Schools in the US? Fethullah Gulen Takes the Great Game a Step Further (2010)

Sibel Edmonds, the most gagged woman in U.S. history wrote:
Fethullah Gulen, whose organizations' net worth is estimated to be somewhere between $22 billion and $50 billion, owns and operates over three hundred Madrasas around the world, including Pakistan, Central Asia, and the Caucasus. While Gulen's suspicious and secretive Madrasas have been shut down and or restrained in countries such as Russia, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, based on these governments' justified suspicions that his schools had more than just education on their agendas, his rapidly and secretively expanding charter school empire here in the US has gone quite unnoticed and unacknowledged.

Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

9/11 mastermind, 4 others sent for trial

Quote:
The United States has formally sent to trial Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, alleged Pakistani mastermind of 9/11 terror attacks, along with four other suspected al Qaeda militants involved in its planning.

They could face the death penalty if found guilty. The five Guantanamo Bay inmates will be tried by a military commission on charges including terrorism, hijacking, conspiracy, murder and destruction of property, the Pentagon said Wednesday.

"If found guilty"? lol! Well sure the inquisition will find them guilty. It's a forgone conclusion. What other verdict would a kangaroo court produce?


NDPP
Offline
Joined: Dec 27 2008

911 The Terrorism Trump Card  - by Brian Burchill

http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2012/04/09/911-the-terrorism-trump-c...

"The time is long overdue for investigative journalists to challenge such references to unsubstantiated terrorism. They can do so with confidence by becoming knowledgeable about the growing body of evidence refuting the official claims about the growing body of evidence refuting the official claims about the events of 9/11.."


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

Thanks NDPP.

Brian Burchill wrote:
In a January 18th interview, Prime Minister Stephen Harper told Mansbridge that he thinks that "the evidence is...overwhelming" and that it "is just beyond dispute at this point" that Iran's purpose is to develop nuclear weapons. When pressed about Iran's insistence that it has no intention to build nuclear weapons, Harper said "I think there is absolutely no doubt they are lying".2

Harper's claims are all-too-reminiscent of US Former Secretary of State Colin Powell's February, 2003, statement at the UN that, with "facts and conclusions based on solid intelligence",3 there was no doubt in his mind that Saddam Hussein was working to obtain key components to produce nuclear weapons.

Harper is a vicious, vicious toadie. Intelligence? Like yellowcake, aluminum tubes and biological WMD that Iraq was supposed to have?

Our snivelleing, grovelling obedient lapdog in phony-majority government will say anything for a pat on the head and a good boy biscuit.

Harper is an embarrassing embarrassment to all Canadians. It's shameful. Harper is a national disgrace.


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004
NDPP
Offline
Joined: Dec 27 2008

Debate on '9/11, False Flags and Black Ops' with Jonathan Kay and Webster Tarpley (and vid)

http://tarpley.net/2012/04/29/debate-on-911-false-flags-and-black-ops-wi...

"with David Frum, Jonathan Kay and Webster Tarpley. This debate is especially relevent coming as it does as the little Ribbentrops of the NATO foreign ministeries escalate their campaign for a near-term attack on Syria and/or Iran.."


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

Thanks NDPP.

Author Jonathan Kay is an embarrassment to the very idea of investigative news journalism. He posits that because General Smedley Butler was able to blow the whistle on a fascist conspiracy to overthrow the FDR government in the 1930's due to independent news media operating freely in America, the same news media is present to accommodate whistleblowers today.

Watergate was leaked by the media, so therefore any 9/11 government conspiracy would necessarily also be leaked to and by the news media.

But Kay makes no mention of the increase in concentration of news media in the hands of a few in the 30 or so years between Watergate and 9/11. He neglected to mention that thousands of news media corporations in America would eventually be owned by five largest corporate owners by the 1990s. Just five. Wouldn't it be easier to control the news and therefore what Americans are thinking with such high concentration of ownership of the news media? 

In fact Jon Kay neglects to mention that Adam Smith and Karl Marx were among the first to point out the fact that capitalists conspire to rig markets in their favour. Monopoly capitalism is a real conspiracy. The goal for every capitalist is to eliminate the competition. One former visiting Soviet dignitary asked his American hosts how US news media could be forced to all report nearly exactly the same news stories as if on queue. The Soviet dignitary said that it was remarkable because in the USSR the state had to threaten their news journalists to achieve similar results.


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

DEATH OF OSAMA? Judge Denies Request For Release Of Bin Laden Death Pictures

CIA: We can't release the photos because they are fakes, and truthers would only point out that the photos were photoshop'd, like all of the forged photos and fake film footage of Elvis bin Laden before.


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

WHO WAS OSAMA? WHO IS OBAMA?

Michel Chossudovsky wrote:
In Libya and Syria, Al Qaeda brigades are the foot soldiers of the US-NATO military alliance. Wherever the US military and intelligence apparatus is deployed, Al Qaeda is present:

Al Qaeda in Iraq, Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), the Libya Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), Al Shaabab (Somalia), Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, Jaish-e-Mohammed (JEM) (Army of Mohammed) (Pakistan), Jemaah Islamiya organization (JI) (Indonesia) Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, etc. (See US State Department Foreign Terrorist Organizations, United Nations Security Council, List of individuals, groups, undertakings and other entities associated with Al-Qaida Al-Qaida Sanctions List)

In a bitter irony, in all these countries, US intelligence is covertly coordinating the activities of Al Qaeda affiliated groups. Officially counterterrorism consists in fighting the "Islamic jihad" Unofficially through covert operations, Western intelligence supports their "assets" including terror entities on the US State Department list.

Moreover, these various terrorist organizations are now being used in US-NATO covert military operations against sovereign countries (e.g. Libya and Syria). According to Israeli intelligence sources:

"NATO headquarters in Brussels and the Turkish high command are meanwhile drawing up plans for their first military step in Syria, which is to arm the rebels with weapons for combating the tanks and helicopters spearheading the Assad regime's crackdown on dissent. Instead of repeating the Libyan model of air strikes, NATO strategists are thinking more in terms of pouring large quantities of anti-tank and anti-air rockets, mortars and heavy machine guns into the protest centers for beating back the government armored forces."(DEBKAfile, NATO to give rebels anti-tank weapons, August 14, 2011)

Obama vs Romney with Al-CIA'duh running the fear factor.

 


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

One Year On, Still No Evidence For Osama Bin Laden's Killing

Brit Dee wrote:
We were initially led to believe that Obama and other members of his administration personally watched bin Laden's killing. White House "situation room" photos featured an apparently shocked Hillary Clinton seemingly watching events live - even though it was subsequently admitted by CIA director Leon Panetta that there had been no live feed during the raid. Several other significant revisions were made to the original account of the raid...

The legend of Elvis bin Laden lives on.


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

The Al Qaeda Underwear Bomber: Another Foiled False Flag

Stephen Lendman wrote:
On May 8, The New York Times headlined "Rare Double Agent Disrupted Bombing Plot, US says."

Most likely it's double-dealing official lies and misreporting. According to Times-speak, a Saudi intelligence agent "infiltrated (a) terrorist group and volunteered for the mission, American and foreign officials said Tuesday."

Washington claims he provided an "innovative bomb" designed for "aviation attack." The Times reported the story without checking for reliability. If official sources say it, accounts follow true or false.

The agent is back in Saudi Arabia, The Times said. CIA agents were involved.

What's true or false isn't clear. What's certain is another false flag for reasons similar to previous ones. They repeat well-timed for strategic advantage.

They're manufactured to look real. Media scoundrels headline them. Most people don't know they've been had. The scam repeats because it works. No wonder America gets away with murder and much more.

Strategy of Tension

Quote:
We are at War

against International Terrorism,
defending our Values
and our Civilization.


mmphosis
Offline
Joined: Apr 28 2009

NDPP
Offline
Joined: Dec 27 2008

Iran Accused of Being Behind 9/11 Attacks  - by Julie Levesque

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=30777

"The US court judgment issued Dec 2011 (Havlish v Iran) which blames the Iran government for the 9/11 attacks is part of the propaganda ploy, which consists of demonizing the Islamic Republic of Iran...

also info at #22


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

That's a very good essay by Julie Levesque. The serial fabricators are at it again. 

What happened to Ibn al-Sheikh al-Libi? 2009 Fabricated evidence for Iraqi ties to "Al-Qa'eda" or Dead men tell no tales.

It was announced after the NATO-Qa'eda joint invasion and takeover of Libya that Gadaffi was collaborating with the American CIA in torturing prisoners. Gadafi was apparently a partner in the phony war on terror. I think the former Gadaffi realized too late that it is a phony war, and that it was really Al-CIA'da attempting to assassinate him in the late 2000's.


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

The Case of the Missing Terrorists

Quote:
If there were any real terrorists, Jose Rodriguez would be dead.

Who is Jose Rodriguez? He is the criminal who ran the CIA torture program. Most of his victims were not terrorists or even insurgents. Most were hapless individuals kidnapped by warlords and sold to the Americans as "terrorists" for the bounty paid.

If Rodriguez's identity was previously a secret, it is no more. He has been on CBS "60 Minutes" taking credit for torturing Muslims and using the information allegedly gained to kill leaders of al Qaeda. If terrorists were really the problem that Homeland Security, the FBI and CIA claim, Rodriguez's name would be a struck through item on the terrorists' hit list. He would be in his grave.

"Al-Qa'eda" apparently uninterested in gaining revenge on numerous NeoCon crusader terrorists and most of them sitting ducks, which would be unlike their repeated attempts to off Fidel who they tried to murder more than 600 times since the 1950's. But Al-CIA'da did succeed with Gadafi and a number of others, yes they did. So they are not total incompetents in the end.


Noops
Offline
Joined: Feb 15 2005
I came to the 9/11 truth movement really late (like late last year). Hey, I was busy living my life, what can I say? I am one of those people who likes to check out the nitty gritty details of things/events but also keep the big picture clearly in mind with everything, not just 9/11. What I would like to know is who is coordinating, or trying to coordinate, all 9/11 truther efforts? Is anyone on the planet? I haven't found anything yet on the net. The reason I ask is the following. There are reams of information, videos etc. on the net today with details of alternate conspiracy theories and what not. Some is junk of course, but there are enough pieces or info that seem like solid evidence showing the 'official 9/11 story' is not accurate. There are 9/11 truthers in the U.S. Canada and all over the world. They don't all agree on what happened on Sep. 11, 2001, nor what specific evidence shows that the official version is not accurate. That really isn't important at this stage. What is important is that something is done soon to launch another U.S. inquiry into the event, this time an impartial inquiry. In order for this to take place I believe one or more of the following needs to take place: 1. An individual or groups needs to coordinate as many truthers/truther groups as possible so that the groups are all unified into one. Again, the members do not have to all agree on what the nitty gritty happened on 9/11. All the members though have to agree that a new impartial U.S. inquiry on 9/11 must take place as soon as possible. 2. The biggest, most famous, influential U.S. individuals (actors/politicians/TV show hosts/authors etc. need to be recruited to speak out in favour of this new impartial U.S. inquiry. Some have, but their numbers are far too few. 3. A 'JFK style' movie needs to be made and released to rally the masses in the U.S. to demand a new impartial U.S. inquiry. 4. Rich businessmen, somewhere in this world, need to purchase an old, ready for the scrap, Boeing 767 and find a tall skyscraper somewhere in this world that can be used as a target as part of a controlled experiment. If a building can't be found, then they should build one! Then the plane should be flown into the evacuated building by remote control, the entire event being videotaped. I believe that anything else that is done, short of the above; seminars, books etc. on 9/11, while noble in effort, won't be effective ultimately in bringing about a new inquiry.

Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

Noops wrote:
What is important is that something is done soon to launch another U.S. inquiry into the event, this time an impartial inquiry.

Certain retired CIA and national intelligence officers(US cold warriors) agree and disagree. They say the 9/11 report is a joke, and that unlike the Nuremberg trials for prosecuting WW II era war criminals, any new investigation and trial should be done outside the USA in a World Court of Law. 

In this case the war criminals in cosmetic US Government, DoD, and clandestine services would never allow a legitimate investigation much less incriminate themselves in anything resembling proceedings recognized by the rest of the world as being legal and legitimate. Any new legal panel and team of prosecutors has to have teeth with authority to prosecute, subpoena powers and international recognition. No more hiding evidence and guilt behind a veil of secrecy referred to as US "national security." National security just means whatever in hell they want it to mean, like medieval inquisitions of bygone times. The military inquisitions are so illegit and so laughable that they have avoided trying the lastest 9/11 "masterminds" in kangaroo courts at Guantanamo Nazi Germany style. First it was Elvis bin Laden, and now the latest patsy is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who fought for the CIA in 1980s Afghanistan. More lies to cover-up previous fiction and so on.

"Al-Qa'eda" was created by the bipartisan war party comprised of two right wings and is responsible for the ongoing cover-up of their own conspiracy to fund and support terrorism in Central Asia, the Middle East, North Africa and beyond. The never ending global war on terror is based on lies and deception. One of their own CIA officials in Turkey said Elvis bin Laden died in 2006 while fighting another of their dirty wars, and by that time in Chechnya. They've told so many lies to the public that they are no longer capable of telling the truth. They are pathological liars and so corrupt that they are above the laws of the former United States of America.


Noops
Offline
Joined: Feb 15 2005
Fidel wrote:
...any new investigation and trial should be done outside the USA in a World Court of Law.
Sure, a World Court of Law trial/inquiry would be just as good, probably even better than a new U.S. inquiry, if it carried legal authority for prosecutions. I was simply thinking of the noble efforts by several countries, Japan comes to mind, where they were trying to hold inquiries in their respective countries. Those efforts wouldn't be very effective in getting to the truth and prosecuting those who broke U.S. law. BTW, I fully support the rest of your post as well. Well stated!.

Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

Noops wrote:
Those efforts wouldn't be very effective in getting to the truth and prosecuting those who broke U.S. law.
 

There is no real U.S. Law anymore. SCO countries and the rest of world see the US as a lawless and corrupt nation since 9/11 and the decade of war crimes, Wall St bank heists etc. The oligarchs are sacking and looting Rome themselves while there is still time.

They've violated Geneva conventions and international law since Nuremberg. The world would never have known about Himmler's false flag terrorism namely the the Gleiwitz incident if it hadn't been for a war crimes tribunal outside the influence and control of Nazi Germany.

They could add 9/11 shutzstaffel copy-cat terror to a long list of war crimes perpetrated by neocons("Liberal democrats" and Republicans on the same team and who who collaborated in creating"Al-Qa'eda" and Taliban since propping-up mujahideen terror with billions of taxpayer dollars in the 1980s) who continue using false pretexts to wage a phony global war on terror.

Neocons and their friendlies are still funding the spread of right wing militant Islam in Asia and Africa, "the Middle East" etc.

Prescott Bush's grandson & Two Chickenhawks convicted of war crimes by tribunal  It's a start and part of the historical record. How very brave they are.


mmphosis
Offline
Joined: Apr 28 2009

Noops
Offline
Joined: Feb 15 2005
mmphosis wrote:

Abby Martin and Sibel Edmonds on RT TV (911blogger.com)

Thanks for the link! I bought Sibel Edmonds' book a couple of weeks ago. It's very well written and informative. I recommend it. The interview above however is not very good. It highlights something that most here are aware of. You can have the most brilliant person, a person with the most damning evidence/smoking gun etc., but if they are not good speakers it all goes for naught. Sibel is asked good questions by Abby Martin, but she doesn't answer them succinctly and on topic. She meanders here and there and loses the audience in doing so. Sibel is a very clever woman though and a good writer.

Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

She is a very clever woman indeed. Sibel Edmonds and a number of courageous women very important anti-imperialists fighting for the truth today, They are fighting to reclaim noble concepts, like freedom, liberty and democracy. They fight the good fight on behalf of all of us in a war being waged against all of us.

Muslim Brotherhood Leader In Egypt Wants New 9/11 Investigation

Well that does it! This is proof positive that the Muslim Brotherhood must necessarily be anti-imperialists all. It's either that or they've realized they are short on anti-imperialist cred.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or register to post comments