Getting my A, B, and C's - Have multivitamins become a basic food group?

53 posts / 0 new
Last post
malex
Getting my A, B, and C's - Have multivitamins become a basic food group?

 

malex

On the subject of Graham Harvey's "We Want Real Food" (as posted in the book lounge - I have yet to read the book)- I heard a couple of years ago that because we aren't getting the necessary nutrients in our food anymore, all adults should be taking a basic multivitamin. I'm not sure if Harvey recommends this in his book, but feeling especially lethargic and sluggish the last few weeks I decided to be proactive and seek out a multivitamin...I was baffled at the amount of different multivitamin cocktails are out there! Has anybody read of a magical formula for getting their vitamin A, B, and C's (not to mention D, and minerals - iron, magnesium, potassium etc etc)?

Michelle

I find it hard to believe that with a well-balanced diet that we can't get the vitamins we need. I've always thought that it was more about eating poorly than the food itself. But I also read that book review (Lisa, you always get such good reviews!) and it's making me unsure. I believe it when they say that even healthy food like veggies and fruit and grain are less healthy now than they used to be. But are vitamin pills any more healthy? I'm not convinced.

Fidel

An article about Ottawa's top chefs said potatoes have lost 60 percent of vitamin C since the 1960's. One of the commentators is a graduate of Le Cordon Bleu. I take a multivitamin.

Sineed

I've heard about foods losing their nutrients and personally take a multivitamin. Taking large doses of any one vitamin to treat disease is more scientifically dubious. Women should have more iron and calcium due to blood loss and their higher risk for osteoporosis, respectively.

Though if foods have gotten less nutritious over the last 50 years, why are kids bigger than ever? I don't mean obesity; I mean height. Seems commonplace these days for teenage boys to be well over six feet.

Stargazer

I would recommend a powder multi-vitamin called Multi-Force by Prairie Naturals. As a vegetarian, who eats no junk food and a lot of greens, I still do not get my recommended dosage of vitamins thus the Multi-Force (also contains Minerals), which I mix in a blender with two scoops of Soy and/or Whey protein, Udo's essential oils, some pineapple juice, some soy yogurt and some fresh fruit (usually a banana for maximum potassium). This combination is recommended for active people, as the Multi-Force contains 21g of carbohydrates, which are essential for working out.

One of these shakes a day and I feel great the entire day, have much more energy and feel healthy physically.

malex

quote:


Originally posted by Sineed:

Though if foods have gotten less nutritious over the last 50 years, why are kids bigger than ever? I don't mean obesity; I mean height. Seems commonplace these days for teenage boys to be well over six feet.[/QB]


yeah, i hear you...girls too...but i'm not sure this is a matter of mere nutrients...i'm sure genetics play some role as well...

malex

quote:


Originally posted by Stargazer:
[b]I would recommend a powder multi-vitamin called Multi-Force by Prairie Naturals. As a vegetarian, who eats no junk food and a lot of greens, I still do not get my recommended dosage of vitamins thus the Multi-Force (also contains Minerals), which I mix in a blender with two scoops of Soy and/or Whey protein, Udo's essential oils, some pineapple juice, some soy yogurt and some fresh fruit (usually a banana for maximum potassium). This combination is recommended for active people, as the Multi-Force contains 21g of carbohydrates, which are essential for working out.

One of these shakes a day and I feel great the entire day, have much more energy and feel healthy physically.[/b]


thanks for the tip! i will have to investigate...i forgot to mention i'm a student with little income to spare...

malex

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Sineed:
[QB]I've heard about foods losing their nutrients and personally take a multivitamin. Taking large doses of any one vitamin to treat disease is more scientifically dubious. Women should have more iron and calcium due to blood loss and their higher risk for osteoporosis, respectively.

actually i noticed now that companies are manufacturing gender-specific multivitamins with the 'for girls' version being higher on the iron and calcium...oh and a pink-coloured container...how obnoxious!

Stargazer

quote:


thanks for the tip! i will have to investigate...i forgot to mention i'm a student with little income to spare...

Any time malex. I think I paid about 25 dollars for a decent sized jug of the Multi-Force. It probably will last about 3 - 4 weeks at one scoop a day. Much cheaper than buying all of the vitamins in pill form separately. That costs far too much.

500_Apples

Stargazer, where did you find a vegetarian-friendly whey protein? When I had last looked (a while back...) they had the adjective bovine somewhere in the ingredients.

Stargazer

This one has no animal products. The reason I am using whey is because too much soy is not a good thing. The only other option is soy.

500_Apples

Yup, that's all stores carry in Canada as far as I've seen. When I briefly used it a frew years back I took a chocolate whey thing but my parents thought it was steroids and threw a fit everytime I used it. There seems to be more choice in the USA: [url=http://proteinfactory.com/store/]Protein Factory[/url]

Stargazer

Hahaha. That's funny about the parents.

Weird though how I still hear people say using Creatine is okay and natural. Yes our bodies produce creatine through eating meat but taking creatine in powder form to bulk up seems like cheating to me. Plus it's mainly water retention so I'm not sure what the point is really. Have you heard of this?

Thanks for that link 500. Looks like a good source.

Sineed

Even though I (sometimes) take a multivitamin just to make sure I get a little bit of everything, I'm not sure all these supplements are a good thing. We did not evolve under circumstances where we consumed large quantities of any single nutrient, so I doubt we need them. I'm kinda leery about all these protein powders, Greens, etc, which may have long-term toxicities of which we are not yet aware.

When I was in school, we were taught that taking large amounts of fat-soluble vitamins had the potential to be toxic (such as Vitamin A) and taking large amounts of the water-soluble vitamins made for expensive urine. In the past twenty years, I have seen or read nothing to moderate this opinion. Basically, I figure looking after your health in a general way is going to do more for you than popping bee pollen or cider vinegar, whatever.

Though speaking of not looking after your health, in my younger days, when I would go out drinking and then have to open the drug store way early in the morning, I would take Maltlevol to help set things right. I haven't worked regular retail in a while and don't know if they still make the stuff, but basically it's sherry with lots of B vitamins and was my favourite hangover remedy especially if one has to work an 8 to 10 hour shift under banks of painfully bright fluorescent lights.

500_Apples

I've heard of the creatine, I tried it when I tried the whey and had the same issue with my parents. A lot of studies have found whey/creatine is the most effective bbing combination. Right now, I wouldn't dream of using creatine because my goal is to cut as I'm hoping to one-up what I did last summer by doing a triathlon this coming summer. However, when I bought the creatine, I was trying to build up muscle. It... really seemed to work. I was doing more reps at the same weight.

I think the extra water helps you lift more, but once you've lifted more you've lifted more and so you build up more strength. If I ever tried again (I'm moving out in the fall), I'll try with the whole "loading-cycling" procedure.

Farmpunk

Food is losing it's nutritional value because of the way it's produced. This is a staple of organic thought, to bring nutrition back to food via the manner in which it's grown or raised.

I'm wary of supplements, thinking of snake oil. When people start taking pills, or ingesting supplements, to make themselves lose weight, or gain weight, or gain whatever percieved benefit, I start to wonder strongly about who is benefitting, in the end.

Fidel

[url=http://www.charlespoliquin.com/members/modules.php?name=News&file=articl... tips to finding a better multi-vitamin/mineral supplement[/url] by Charles Poliquin

Charles is a strength training coach and has trained Olympic medalists in over ten different sports. He's from Ottawa.

Sineed

quote:


I'm wary of supplements, thinking of snake oil. When people start taking pills, or ingesting supplements, to make themselves lose weight, or gain weight, or gain whatever percieved benefit, I start to wonder strongly about who is benefitting, in the end.

Good point; many people who are giving advice on supplements are the same people who sell the supplements. (And I'm speaking as one who used to sell supplements.)

The placebo effect is enormous and necessarily has to be ignored by everybody who promotes supplementation.

And I've sometimes wondered how many body-builders have claimed to bulk up through the use of protein powders and other supplements in order to hide their use of anabolic steroids.

Farmpunk

My gym is full of guys taking supplements. The atheletic, sports performance, or muscle building supplement industry is very big and preys upon body image. I wonder if the steroids or HGH aren't hidden in the supplement itself.

There's many a pro level athelete (Shawne Merriman being most recent) who claim "tainted" supplements as a reason they've failed performance enhancing drug tests. Maybe they aren't all lying.

Stargazer

I think if you lift weights and work out at least 4 - 5 times a week, a large amount of protein is absolutely necessary. I also don't think there is anything wrong with taking multi-vitamins, especially if you cannot manage the 6 small meals recommended daily.

My goal is not to bulk up, but to gain weight through adding muscle mass naturally. Your body needs carbs and protein in order for it to work at this level. I also prefer the defined look. To me the back is incredibly sexy and a nice defined back is even better. Likewise arms and abs.

Thanks for that info 500_apples. I'm not really aware so much of the effects of creatine. All I have heard is that it increases water retention but what you said makes sense.

Here is a good link on protein:

[url=http://www.vanderbilt.edu/AnS/psychology/health_psychology/Protein.htm]P... for Active People[/url]

Farmpunk

I bike, kayak, canoe, run, and lift weights while working as a manual labourer. I don't take supplements but I really enjoy eating.

The presence of vitamins and supplements is, to me, indicative of the awful state of the food industry.

Stargazer

You'll get no argument from me on that front Farmpunk. I agree.

Sineed

quote:


There's many a pro level athelete (Shawne Merriman being most recent) who claim "tainted" supplements as a reason they've failed performance enhancing drug tests. Maybe they aren't all lying.

Yeah, I think it's possible. Sometimes Health Canada does inspections of "traditional" medicines being sold in downtown Toronto, and they find them containing real pharmaceuticals, like warfarin, furosemide, antibiotics, etc. If I were an elite-level athlete, I'd try to do it with diet only, other than multivitamins manufactured in Canada. I'd avoid imported supplements at all costs.

Farmpunk, what's your opinion of organic produce/meats? Better? A scam? I have sometimes bought them, but it makes me uneasy to spend all this money when often I can't tell the difference. I've noticed the organic meats taste a lot better, however. But with something like carrots, well, a carrot's a carrot.

Farmpunk

Putting aside the politics and production of food (like I've ever been able to do that while posting on babble... but moving on), from what I've read the biggest gains in nutrition are to be had through the proper production of meat, which just so happens to be the most sustainable production methods, as well. Like managed pasture, grass fed and finished beef.

Of course, that's where I get into discussions with vegetarians and vegans.

There's also quite a lot of evidence about organic veggies producing more nutritous food, but the lines aren't as clear, to me, and the gains not as obvious.

Taste is very subjective. Being honest, picky eaters make me cringe.

The cost of organics is also hard to put a finger on. I've argued on many occasions that high quality, low cost food would be one of the easiest societal changes to enact through the political process, and should be high on the list of any progressive person's agenda. But the food industry and government status quo is so immensely stacked against a change like that (farmers as paid public servants, for instance; rural-urban partnerships) that it's not even on the radar.

Fidel

Mechanized farming methods use fertilizers to supplement the soil instead of leaving fields to fallow before replanting again. So what's the difference between supplementing soil and diet with supplements ?

Farmpunk

All plants, and animals, need to eat to live. Agriculture is nothing but managing a natural process, tweaking it, or improving it in a way to get the results you want.

Would people rather get their vitamins from a plastic container labeled Multivitamin, or eat apples? I know, as a consumer, exactly what an apple is. I don't know what a supplement is made of, where it comes from, how far it's traveled to get into my system, nothing. It's a manufactured product, in every sense. There's nothing a supplement can do that nature hasn't provided in one food or another.

Farmpunk

Good question. Fertilizers simply speed up the natural process. The supplements and vitamins I see being used, sold, and touted, are for convienience, or seem to be intended to outsmart nature: bigger, faster, stronger, easier. Eat what you want and lose weight with this pill. Vitamin E prolongs life.

Fidel
Stargazer

quote:


Being honest, picky eaters make me cringe.

I don't consider being a 'picky eater' a bad thing. After all, isn't that what you are advocating? Picky eating? Jesus what is with the people who have issues with other people's food intake? I eat what is healthy for me. Not to please you or other vegan\vegetarian haters. Meat is NOT healthy, especially the crap bought at grocery stores. No amount of propaganda from anyone is going to convince me eating anything without first doing research and deciding what is best FOR ME is an issue they need to be concerned with.

You don't see or hear me deriding meat eaters for all their shitty choices in food do you? How about I start in on people who eat eggs, and fast foods, and fill their bodies up with junk food.

What I put in my body is my business. I'll be 42 next year and I can guarantee you my health is better than a lot of people half my age.

Sineed

But there's a difference between picky eaters and being particular about what you eat. Making appropriate food choices is a separate issue from people who kick up a fuss over the food not being prepared exactly the way they like.

For instance, now that my kids are older, they are less picky. That is to say, they are now less likely to treat me like a server in a fancy restaurant who will take the food back and switch it if there's too much pepper or if the peas accidently got mixed in with the mashed potatoes.

AND, because my kids are now less picky, I am finding it easier to make appropriate food choices because they are more willing to eat (or at least try) tofu, sweet potatoes, bok choy, and other healthy things.

I would even argue that pickiness is an enemy of good nutrition. Picky eaters like a small number of foods, good for them or no. Two-year-olds who will only eat macaroni and cheese and peanut butter sandwiches on white bread would be a classic example.

Farmpunk

I'm with Sineed. Sorry if I didn't make myself clear enough. I wasn't slamming vegans\vegetarians.

The problem I have is when people complain about food and then turn their noses up at what's availible. If a person commits themselves to a local diet (and they should), then they are going to have to become less persnickity about what they eat. Simple as that. Know what grows in your region and start forming your food choices there.

Stargazer

That I can understand, as well as try to do. For instance, I'm more than willing to pay more money for locally grown food, and go out of my way to look for it as well. Now if only we could get the grocery stores to start stalking more local foods.

Sineed

Yeah, I try to buy locally when I can, too. If enough of us do this, stores will be motivated to stock local produce out of economic self-interest.

Doesn't it bug you when at the height of apple season, next to all the gorgeous Ontario apples, supermarkets will have huge bins of apples from, say, China? I'm trying to educate my kids to see what's wrong with this. Maybe local food producers could go into the schools and talk to the kids, like the way the schools bring in policemen and firemen to talk about safety. And kids can learn about the economic and environmental costs of transporting food long distances, for instance.

500_Apples

Hey,

Can someone suggest a link to an eating locally for dummies article, benefits and such? It doesn't strike me as self-evident that it's necessarily bad for fruits to come from california, florida... the only argument I can think is that invasive species destroy local ecosystems.

What do local eaters do for fruits/vegetables in the winter? Relatively local foods like stuff from latin america?

Thanks.

oreobw

Local stores do carry lots of local stuff during season (in my area of Toronto).

But it is hard to find local green vegs,tomatoes, etc in February. Also, local orange juice in Ontario?

So what's wrong with Florida orange juice.

Actually, I have the feeling I might be missing the point here, but for most stuff (food and otherwise) I try to buy local, and if I can't then US then elsewhere.

[ 20 February 2007: Message edited by: oreobw ]

Fidel

quote:


Originally posted by 500_Apples:
[b] It doesn't strike me as self-evident that it's necessarily bad for fruits to come from california, florida... the only argument I can think is that invasive species destroy local ecosystems.[/b]

Anything's possible when political conservatives are running the show. There's been tainted spinach from California to dirty water in Walkerton and Kashechewan.

[url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/health/ecoli-timeline.html]Timeline: E. coli contamination in Canada[/url]

Even though food supply is a top priority for every civilization since time immemorial, Canada subsidizes its farmers the least among developed nations. And after the most idiotic free trade agreements in the history of the world were signed, our food regulations and health standards will suffer by integration with the world's most wasteful and dangerous economy to the south of us.

Farmpunk

The idea is that a person should attempt to eat the food of your region, that CAN be grown locally, ahead of anything else, year round. I know the Ontario market best, so that's where I'll place my examples.

Winter\February veggie eating, and what should be availible "fresh": sweet potatoes, cabbage of different types and hues, potatoes, carrots, onions, squash... Roots crops, easily stored, likely with little refridgeration. I grow and eat a long storage cabbage that gets as big as bowling balls and keeps for six months or better. The outside layers might get mucky but they peel off easily. I also eat my own red onions until spring. I should grow my own carrots and sweet potatoes, and potatoes, but don't. I do freeze and preserve all kinds of food that isn't locally availible in the winter. Making preserves is a lost art, and it's very simple.

I do not buy hot house tomatoes. They taste like shit, for one thing, in comparison to the real outdoor deal, and growing tomatoes in a greenhouse in the winter does not make sense to me.

Eat locally, eat seasonally, buy whole foods. In southern Ontario, we are, weather permitting, only a couple months away from asparagus season. Follow the natural cycles of what's growing in your backyard (literally, or locally) and you'll be very surprised at the variety.

The reasons why people should concentrate on these types of eating patterns is simple, when you think about it. Suffice it to say, for now, that the Cali produce in our grocery stores (or the Washington state apples that drive me insane) are sold at a cost that does not reflec the true cost of getting that item into your grocery bag. If you're on the west coast, Cali produce makes sense. Cali produce in Toronto does not.

Of course, that's just vegetables. In a true seasonal, local arrangement, a lot of nutrition would come from meat. Wintertime being the slaughter season for pork and beef. But, as the original post reminds us, there's often times not a lot of nutrition in the food we eat. A problem I believe is exaggerated in meat production.

500_Apples

quote:


The reasons why people should concentrate on these types of eating patterns is simple, when you think about it. Suffice it to say, for now, that the Cali produce in our grocery stores (or the Washington state apples that drive me insane) are sold at a cost that does not reflec the true cost of getting that item into your grocery bag. If you're on the west coast, Cali produce makes sense. Cali produce in Toronto does not.


Why is the cost of Cali produce so low?

Ignorant answer: Probably agriculture is an easier profession in California. I mean, it's california, so I really doubt it's cheap wages. Are pesticides subsidized in California?

I'm not trying to argue anything, just trying to know what's going on.

Farmpunk

500-A,

Labour not cheap in Cali? Not to be an enourmous dick, but you have to be kidding. Big agriculture, including the organic operations, in Cali is based almost entirely upon the modern day version of slave labour in the US: illegal Mexicans.

Even grown in Ontario produce is subject to a version of this. The migrant worker programs. 20 thousand of them in ag last year, I believe, with many more coming to many industries across the board very soon. Who's outsmarting whom here?

US ag is subsidized, across the board, and is likely tied in with trucking-shipping business. Only so much mixed lettuce can fit into a transport. How much does it cost to get that produce to Toronto, say, or Montreal, in diesel alone? Not counting the cost of the driver's salary? Plus the basic production cost of the produce itself.

500_Apples

When I said cheap I meant cheap like in China, which is slowly eradicating any manufacturing in north america because they can be that much cheaper than here. I don't see them being much cheaper than Ontario workers unless mexican workers get paid below minimum wage.

Your point about higher US subsidies for agriculture is more obvious, I'm surprised I forgot about that one. That means all things being equal american produce would still be cheaper. Are you taking a moral stand against taking advantage of the american taxpayer's spending decisions?

Again - I'm really not trying to argue. I'm sure these are elementary questions and can be answered by anyone intelligent who does local eating and has spent more than 15 minutes thinking about it.

Farmpunk

F-A, in the end I suspect there is a lot of reasons why Cali produce turns up in Ontario supermarkets. The reasons stretch from the consumer to the government policies to the production methods. There are no easy answers. But the easiest answer I can give anyone is to simply think about what they're consuming, where it comes from, why they're eating it. Local and seasonal is a step beyond that idea which I'm not sure many people are going to follow, or give merit to.

Fidel

It's strange that U.S. Conservatives don't believe in exposing their own farmers and agribusinesses to the dictates of global markets. But the IMF and WB demand that developing economies open their markets to cheap American produce subsidized by big government and cheap migrant labour. I guess political conservatives preach free markets to poor countries but prefer socialism at home.

Farmpunk

Do we have a free market or a controlled market? As far as agriculture goes, I wish I knew.

Southlander

quote:


Originally posted by Farmpunk:
[b]Do we have a free market or a controlled market? As far as agriculture goes, I wish I knew.[/b]

As soon as you bring in a minumum wage you have a controlled market. Then you need import restrictions to keep out cheap imports from a country with lower minumum wages. Then we have exceptions to keep trading partners and leftward leaning foreign leaders happy. Next farmers need income support. Then markets are flooded so we have production controls. Then we need quotas to stop big business getting rich. Then excess production is dumped cheaply overseas (sometimes free and called 'aid'), putting subsistance farmers overseas out of business.

Free markets don't exist in 'civilised' western countries.

biker

There are many good Canadian made multivitamins (Prairie Naturals, Trophic, Flora, Natural Factors) on the market available at natural food stores. Choose a medium dose(maximum 25 mg. of B vitamins) multi without iron. Take it with meals once or twice a day. Men do not need supplemental iron and women only need iron if blood tests show they do. If a woman needs iron it should be taken on its own away from other supplements. Stargazer has a good recipe for a morning shake that's better than simply adding a pill.

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

I found this listing of [url=http://www.cookingnook.com/10-healthiest-foods.html]The Top 10 Healthiest Foods[/url] interesting. I have a good size veggie garden with three items growing from the list: garlic, spinach, and tomatoes (it's not been a good growing season so far, however).

I can only get canned salmon here, although starting this week the fishermen are bringing in fresh caught cod.

I'd love to grow berries, and will go through the bush and try and transplant wild varieties of blueberries and raspberries.

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

On another tangent, and because I don't know exactly where to put this, someone's advertising a disgusting-looking "Angus Burger" on teevee, and looking at that awful greasy thing is enough to put me off meat for a week. It's about as bad as anything from Carl's Jr. south of the border.

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

Oh, and I discovered transplanting berries from the wild doesn't work well here. [img]frown.gif" border="0[/img]

Fidel

[url=http://www.standard-freeholder.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=2280515]Vitamin C research called "hog wash"[/url] Gifford-Jones

Quote:
Fact No. 1-- Dr. Linus Pauling, two-time Nobel Prize winner reported that humans, unlike animals, do not produce vitamin C. Vitamin C is needed to manufacture collagen, the mortar that holds cells together. Without good collagen, coronary artery vessels develop stress fractures and set the stage for fatal blood clots. Just like buildings collapse with faulty mortar.

Fact No. 2-- Dr. William Stebhens, professor of pathology at Wellington University in New Zealand, agreed that Pauling was right. That it was mechanical stress on coronary arteries that triggered heart attack.

Fact No. 3 -- Researchers at Ulleval University Hospital in Norway reported a study that vitamin C in fruits and berries was associated with decreased atherosclerosis in carotid arteries. So if small amounts of vitamin C decrease hardening of arteries, what would larger amounts do?

Fact No. 4-- Dr. Sydney Bush, a distinguished professor of optometry in England, took pictures of retinal arteries, prescribed large doses of vitamin C and a year later took more photos. The latter showed that high doses of vitamin C, along with the amino acid lysine, reversed hardening of arteries.

Fact No. 5 -- Critics should reflect on why humans get heart attacks and animals do not. Goats manufacture 13,000 mg of C daily and increase it to 100,000 mg if ill. Yet health authorities claim humans only need 60 mg daily! This amount keeps us from getting scurvy, but does not protect us from heart attack.

Stargazer

Sineed wrote:
I've heard about foods losing their nutrients and personally take a multivitamin. Taking large doses of any one vitamin to treat disease is more scientifically dubious. Women should have more iron and calcium due to blood loss and their higher risk for osteoporosis, respectively.

Though if foods have gotten less nutritious over the last 50 years, why are kids bigger than ever? I don't mean obesity; I mean height. Seems commonplace these days for teenage boys to be well over six feet.

 

Good question Sineed. Why are young females developing earlier than ever? Why are they getting bigger (not heavier)? I am convinced it is because of the growth hormones that are pumped into factory farm animals - cows, chickens, pigs, etc... There have been studies on this.

 

http://envirocancer.cornell.edu/Factsheet/Diet/fs37.hormones.cfm

Pages