Gender segregated camp in NS says boys should hike and girls should get pedicures

35 posts / 0 new
Last post
Will S
Gender segregated camp in NS says boys should hike and girls should get pedicures

 

Will S

Didn't see this elsewhere on the board, and though it probably fits with feminism too, I'll stick it in a board that doesn't get used as much.

[url=http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070810.wcamp10/BNSt... campers[/url]

I hate this sort of thing. My parents let me play with both 'girl' toys and 'boy' toys when I was a kid because I enjoyed them both. Of course, when I brought She-Ra's horse Swiftwind to school in Grade One I realized pretty quickly that it wasn't something I should be playing with if I wanted to fit in.

This stuff follows kids everywhere. In Grade 9 we had sex-segregated gym classes that often engaged in different sports. The boys had to wrestle, the girls got to dance, we played Murder Ball, they did gymastics. Frankly I think I would have preferred dancing and summersaults to body slams and bruises from balls whipped at me.

I'm not a fan of sex/gender-segregated things in general, though I do agree there are some good arguments in favour of them, but if you're going to segregate the kids you should at least give them a range of activities. I'm sure this girl would have feigned interest in a pedicure one day if she knew she could go hiking the next day (and vice versa for the fans of the Glamour Girl experience). I'm happy to hear the family was able to take its own vacation, but I'm sure there are many families who wouldn't have the money or time off work to do the same.

ETA: Hopefully that fixes it.

[ 10 August 2007: Message edited by: Will S ]

oldgoat

Say Will, ya might want to double check that link.

Gir Draxon

quote:


"Next year, if girls do like to go fishing and they want to play the golf, there could be a mixture," he said. "There's a very good chance this might never happen again."

Well yeah, now that the story has hit the MSM it's time to re-think the idea... [img]rolleyes.gif" border="0[/img]

Michelle

Unbelievable.

Our community centres in Toronto have all co-ed day camps. They do all of those things.

The girls manage to do it all without worrying about breaking their nails, surprisingly enough!

Maysie Maysie's picture

quote:


Will S: In Grade 9 we had sex-segregated gym classes that often engaged in different sports. The boys had to wrestle, the girls got to dance, we played Murder Ball, they did gymastics. Frankly I think I would have preferred dancing and summersaults to body slams and bruises from balls whipped at me.

[drift]
Dear god, I just had a flashback to Grade 10 gym class. We had a section called, I believe, "Modern Dance". We used props like a stick with a long ribbon on the end, and hula hoops, but not to swing around our hips. The props were flung gracefully about while we "danced" our "routine". The horror! [img]eek.gif" border="0[/img]

Although I will say, it sounds better than body slams and bruises.
[/drift]

My theory about the camp is it's caught in a timewarp to a time that never existed but that everyone thinks happened in the 50s. Good luck with that facade, Richard Dauphinee, ya big doofus. [img]tongue.gif" border="0[/img]

Sharon

quote:


Our community centres in Toronto have all co-ed day camps.

I would say that our community centres in Nova Scotia -- with the exception of this one -- have all co-ed day camps also. I guess that's why this one made the national news. [img]tongue.gif" border="0[/img]

The next development:

quote:

The woman who represents thousands of Nova Scotia anglers has offered a trout-fishing expedition to the Windsor girl refused access to an all-boys outing organized by her local municipality.

[url=http://www.thechronicleherald.ca/Front/852577.html] The Chronicle Herald [/url]

Michelle

Hey BCG, that's actually an Olympic sport, isn't it? I forget what it's called, but it's part of the gymnastics events.

remind remind's picture

quote:


Originally posted by Michelle:
[b]Hey BCG, that's actually an Olympic sport, isn't it? I forget what it's called, but it's part of the gymnastics events.[/b]

Yes it is, rhythmic dance or some such name, as a part of their different gymnastic routines which are required.

A positive thing about small towns, schools and summer programs cannot be separated activities based upon gender, not enough attendance to do gender biased activities. [img]wink.gif" border="0[/img]

Will S

From the Chronicle Herald article:

"A five-year-old getting a facial — that kind of bothers me," she said. "I don’t see the need in it and I certainly don’t understand what kind of message that is sending."

What five-year wouldn't like to look as though they were three again? Really, it's never too early to start agreesive anti-aging treatment. [img]rolleyes.gif" border="0[/img]

mgregus

Looks like this story was spotted by Feministing, and [url=http://feministing.com/archives/007554.html]posted yesterday.[/url] How embarrassing for us in Nova Scotia. [img]redface.gif" border="0[/img] But appropriate too that cases like this get called out.

jrose

Here are the results of a poll conducted by [url=http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060927/your_say_06...


quote:

Friday August 10, 2007
Should boys and girls go to separate camps?
Results:

Yes 51%
No 49%

No.. what's next.? Segregation by colour, religion, ethnicity?? I've been involved with the air cadet organization for over 30 years.. boys and girls attend camp but we teach them to be responsible and when they're not, that's where staff come in to ensure that all kids are safe and that rules are followed. Is it a perfect world? No, of course not... but is there one? But ask yourself if there's much of a difference between camp and school? Should we look at segregated schools next?
Kevin - Roslin, ON

The girl should conduct a poll of others to see if there is interest in a girls camp to parallel the boys activities.It is just to difficult to get the supervisory staff for for mixed gender groups not to mention accomodation and toilet facilities.Unfortunitally for her boys and girls are mostly differant.
Rod

It is not so much 'should' but be 'allowed'. Boys should be allowed to have their own groups the same as girls. I don't see Girl Guides becoming 'Guides'. Scouts should have remained just for boys. There should be girl camps and boy camps and a mixture of both.
Heidi

I am complete support of equality and equal access to services but I think that it is ridiculous to ask that camps change their specific programming to meet the needs of one individual. I do not think that there is a necessity to de-segregate boys and girls camps. I think that there are good reasons to have segregated camps. There may be some boys, girls and/or parents that want their children to go to segregated camps. Some campers may learn better in segregated environment. Currently there are three types of camps, boys only, girls only and mixed camps, this offers choice to parents and campers. It is up to the individual to find the camp that fits with their expectations and needs, if the girls camp does not offer the programming that girls want then I think parents should be working with the camp to offer the desired programing. I think that the young girl and her parents have the power and privilege to work with a girls camp to offer what they want and they will find that there probably is a great many girls that would attend a camp that offers the same outdoor experiences as the boys camp.
Shirley Bell - Peterborough, ON.

I feel that we should have all boy and all girls camps. Some children are much more comfortable at a camp where they don't have the added social pressure of dealing with the opposite sex. Girls and boys develop differently and behave differently especially during their middle elementary years and sometimes it is nice for both genders to have a break from each other. I don't think gender based camps are the issue here at all, the real issue is to have such sevre gender bias when planning the camps. Why can't there be an all girls fishing, hiking and golfing camp? The community should look closely at the way they are sterotyping their children, and maybe offer all girl and all boy camps along with co-ed camps that give the same experiences for both genders.
Anonymous

What an amazing little girl! She is so well-spoken. Even her mother didn't match the ability of this little one to get her point across. As for the 'girls only' camp, I don't blame her for not being interested. Come on, manicures! Is that all we can offer our girls? They should let her attend the camp she is interested in attending. Go fishing!
Wendy Onizak - Winnipeg

It may come as a surprise but believe it or not Boys and Girls are different. When my son was in the Beaver's program in Nova Scotia we were forced to have a girl in the group. I didn't find it a problem but my son said "Dad how come we have to have a girl and yet boys don't want to be in Sparks or Brownies" I could imagine the ridicule should it happen. My point is, sometimes Boys and Girls just want to have something for themselves yet because of one or two families we change the whole organization. The same thing happened when we caved to the Lords prayer and they standing for the National Anthem in schools or the peanut allergies. The majority in elections would never change yet we bend over backwards for the silliest of "TRADITIONS"
Ian Whitecross - Yellowknife

One has to question the ridiculous lengths to which people defend their rights to "equality". On a daily basis I see multitudes of "female only" educational programs, fitness centres, sporting teams and on and on. It seems that the very moment something is organized exclusively for males the discrimination cry is heard across the nation. If this little girl in Nova Scotia wants to go fishing so badly, her parents should buy her a pole and some worms, send her to the water, and stop this grandstanding nonsense!
Bob Brook - Lakefield Ontario


I was a Girl Guide, back when there was a big debate whether girls should be allowed to join the "boys" clubs of Scouts and Cubs and Beavers. I remember at the time (being 11 or 12 or so)And being against the junction. But, back then I didn’t think of it as a gender-equality issue, I saw it more as seeing the boys encroaching on my comfort level. I enjoyed a close-knit group of “girls,” together, without the added pressure of making friends with the boys. Silly looking back on it now! But, it seems as though some of the comments above reflect this idea of a “comfort level” that would be lost if camps were not segregated.

Michelle

I have no problem with having girls' camps and boys' camps. What I have a problem with is not offering girls the outdoors stuff - you know, what people consider to be CAMP activities - while offering it to boys. Fine, set up two camps with the same activities and split it along gender lines if you must. But don't just offer girls pedicures and manicures and call it "camp"!

jrose

Exactly, I agree. I saw both of it happen as a Girl Guide. Camp experiences were generally gender-neutral, and wonderful. And when we did gender-specific activities they seemed to serve a purpose Ie. perusing Fashion magazines, with the purpose of talking about their negative affects on body image. The only thing that stands out as being negative and perpetuating stereotypes, was one meeting where a make-up consultant came in and discussed wearing make up with us, and how to properly apply it (I would have been about 14 at the time...) so that it looks natural, and blah blah blah...but besides that, we did mostly the same things that the boys did, I think!

Sharon

My thoughts also. There were TV clips of the girls at their camp and one of them said, "Things are funner when there are no boys around."

I could relate to that but I was also transfixed by these little girls with faces heavily made up (the lipstick outside the lipline, the way makeup artists try to make you look when you're going on TV -- no looking "natural" here) and their little hands and feet with painted nails.

One of the camp leaders said she was distressed by all the fuss and said, "Look around. These are little girls having fun together."

Which is lovely. But I wish it had been in another context.

500_Apples

Are there enough parents of girls who want their girls to engage in "tomboyish" activities to financially justify the opening a girls camp which is not all about nails and facials?

I'm not a parent yet, so I can't know. I would want my sons and daughters to go beyond a little box, but I'm merely a single 23 year old male who thinks he has the answers. Are parents gendering their kids less than they used to?

Michelle

Uh, "tomboyish"? Hiking is "tomboyish"? Golfing is "tomboyish"?

I'm sorry, I've forgotten, what decade are we in again? I think I just experienced a timewarp reading your post.

[ 15 August 2007: Message edited by: Michelle ]

500_Apples

I intentionally put the word in quotation marks. I am asking a question about the attitude of Canadian parents today.

[ 15 August 2007: Message edited by: 500_Apples ]

Michelle

To mean what? Who were you quoting?

Free_Radical

Quotation marks do not necessarily mean you're quoting someone.

I believe what Apples is trying to say is, how successful would an all-girls outdoors (as in fishing, etc.) camp be if parents have already gendered their daughters towards rejecting such "tomboyish" things?

[ 15 August 2007: Message edited by: Free_Radical ]

500_Apples

I thought the quotation mark was a well-understood tool of internet communication. Sort of like caps lock means screaming, or : ) means smiley face. It could denote sarcasm, or a word used in a way that is often used but perhaps shouldn't be used, or an exagerration.

Thus, writing tomboy in reference to mountain hiking would be a time-warp. "tomboy" on the other hand, would imply that perhaps there is some residual aspect to the old meaning, or that many might still use it that way, incorrectly.

Michelle

Not to get too nitpicky, but you wrote a post in which you characterized some activities as "tomboyish". You used quotes, so we can assume you meant that those are activities that could be perceived by some people, but not you, to be "tomboyish". You also questioned whether there would be any demand by parents to enroll girls in those activities that some people, but not you, perceive to be "tomboyish". So my question to you is, who perceives these activities as "tomboyish"?

And what decade are we living in, if we are going to assume that parents of girls won't sign their girls up for hiking because they think it's "tomboyish"? You seriously think that there's a possibility that there would be no demand for an outdoors camp for girls because hiking and fishing and golf could be perceived as "boy" activities?

Thus my timewarp comment. This ain't the 50's anymore. I think most parents of girls recognize that girls like outdoor games and activities as much as boys do.

Sven Sven's picture

quote:


Originally posted by Michelle:
[b]You seriously think that there's a possibility that there would be no demand for an outdoors camp for girls because hiking and fishing and golf could be perceived as "boy" activities? [/b]

I think there would be a great demand for a camp like that, and rightly so.

500_Apples

quote:


Originally posted by Michelle:
[b]Not to get too nitpicky, but you wrote a post in which you characterized some activities as "tomboyish". You used quotes, so we can assume you meant that those are activities that could be perceived by some people, but not you, to be "tomboyish". You also questioned whether there would be any demand by parents to enroll girls in those activities that some people, but not you, perceive to be "tomboyish". So my question to you is, who perceives these activities as "tomboyish"?

And what decade are we living in, if we are going to assume that parents of girls won't sign their girls up for hiking because they think it's "tomboyish"? You seriously think that there's a possibility that there would be no demand for an outdoors camp for girls because hiking and fishing and golf could be perceived as "boy" activities?

Thus my timewarp comment. This ain't the 50's anymore. I think most parents of girls recognize that girls like outdoor games and activities as much as boys do.[/b]


You are being nitpicky. I don't really understand this practice. I always give people the benefit of the doubt on messge boards. Honestly I'm finding this little sidethread ridiculous and I almost feel as if you want me to have made that assholish comment.

Now, I didn't characterize any activities as tomboyish. I characterized them as "tomboyish". There is a massive difference, like light and day. I know it's somewhat problematic, so I wouldn't use that language in front of a five year old. But babble is a mature audience.

quote:

So my question to you is, who perceives these activities as "tomboyish"?


That's not your question to me. That was my open question, which was derailed. My question was precisely on what are parents' perceptions these days, and how and to what extent do they gender their kids. I am not going to give an definitive answer to my own question. Since I asked the question, that means I don't know the answer.

And indeed I don't. Yes, girls do more sports, As much as boys? I don't know. Do parents still gender their kids? Yes, that seems obvious. Are there some girls who would love a camp that's all about fishing, hiking, et cetera? Yes. Are there enough modern parents in even small communities, that whenever running such a boys camp is financially sustainable, it will also be financially sustainable to run a girls camp? That, I don't know. And that's why I asked the question. You can mention the 1950s or the 2000s all you want, but your attitudes as mine are definitely more contemporary than those of a lot of people. And many people are still very much in the 1950s.

Some here have said they have no problems with boys camps and girls camps. But if you're in a small town which also happens to be very traditional, and you have forty boys for the athletic camp, but only six girls whose parents want them to go to such a girls camp, then that option might not be available. Then you can either send the girls to the boys camp, tell the girls to get lost, send hem inconveniently far way, or to some other type of camp, less athletic.

[ 15 August 2007: Message edited by: 500_Apples ]

Sven Sven's picture

quote:


Originally posted by 500_Apples:
[b]like light and day
[/b]

That isn't a very good metaphor, 500. [img]tongue.gif" border="0[/img]

500_Apples

quote:


Originally posted by Sven:
[b]

That isn't a very good metaphor, 500. [img]tongue.gif" border="0[/img] [/b]


All right.

Like fog and day?

[ 15 August 2007: Message edited by: 500_Apples ]

Sven Sven's picture

I was thinking of the more clichй metaphor: Like night and day.

500_Apples

quote:


Originally posted by Sven:
[b]I was thinking of the more clichй metaphor: Like night and day.[/b]

I actually laughed out loud.

I can't believe I wrote that and didn't realize!

Will S

I might have read and forgotten, but was there an option for a mixed-gendered camp too? I agree that there should be a comfort level for kids, and that some girls or boys are more comfortbale when only one sex is around. This boy would not be so comfortable. As a child I had many more girl friends than boy friends and I think it would be a big mistake to use the comfort argument about gender/sex-segrated camps (or any groups for that matter) without also acknowledging there can be great discomfort in single-sex/gender groups. Think of the kids who are queer, or the boys who are effeminate in some way, or the girls who are more masculine (I'm using terms like effeminate/masculine even though I don't agree with gender binaries because those binaries still mostly seem to be in effect). If as a child I had a choice between an all-boys activity or a mixed-gender/sex activity I would invariably choose the latter. I'm trying not to be steroetypical here, but in my experience girls (though not all girls) were a lot more understanding about 'effeminate boys' than the more 'masculine' boys. This becomes even more apparent when there are only boys around and they try to display their manhood. Maybe this wouldn't be so much the case with 5 year olds, but the upper limit for this camp was 12 right? Well by that age I, and many other queer/'different' kids were facing these rigid gender expectations enforced by our peers.

So, as much as I can appreciate kids who are more comfortable in single-gender/sex environments, let's not forget the kids who aren't. I'm not sure how feasible it would be for smaller communities to operate more than one camp (or two single-gender/sex camps), but where possible I know I would certainly like to see them. That one poster in the comments above on the CTV(?) site said girls are different than boys. That may be true, but some boys are different than other boys, and some girls are different than other girls, and sometimes certain boys and girls have much more in common with each other than with other members of their own sex/gender.

jrose

[url=http://www.girlsrockcamp.org/]Or, girls can forget about camping and pedicures, and they can just go to camp to "rock on" and rock out!"[/url]

This website was better than a jolt of caffeine to wake me up this morning!

mgregus

That's awesome, jrose. After the initial jolt of the intro (I think I need that every morning), the small sample screen of past performances is a great taste of the camp experience. Looks like a fantastic time for the girls involved.

jrose

For sure! I want to go to Rock Star camp! [img]biggrin.gif" border="0[/img]

Rexdale_Punjabi Rexdale_Punjabi's picture

this is retarded I would never go to a camp full of guys man screw that. you knoww lol

 

RosaL

Rexdale_Punjabi wrote:

this is retarded I would never go to a camp full of guys man screw that. you knoww lol

Hi R_P,

Can I ask you not to use the word "retarded" the way you have used it in a couple of posts? It really does smack of contempt for people with intellectual disabilities. I'm not saying you mean it that way. But that's how it sounds. 

Rexdale_Punjabi Rexdale_Punjabi's picture

na I don't mean it like that. if you born mentally disabled it means you mentally disabled you aint stupid. If you stupid then you do stuff like shave ur head on public tv. That the difference I never meant it still. Why would I hate on someone who has an intellectual disability? I would be adding to ignorance that im tryna stop it would be like me abusin someone bcuz i been abused you can't do that.

 

edit- yo I don't like ignorant ppl not the ppl who don't know but the ppl who have the facts presented to them in their face, proven wrong yet still deny the truth.