Wheat Board Election Advertising Limits

30 posts / 0 new
Last post
jrootham
Wheat Board Election Advertising Limits

 

jrootham

Did I miss a discussion on [url=http://canadagazette.gc.ca/partI/2008/20080802/html/regle1-e.html]this[/...?

quote:

Issue: There is currently a spending limit on advertising expenses of $10,000 for third parties that register as third-party intervenors in elections for directors of the Canadian Wheat Board (CWB). As this limit is set by regulation, a regulatory amendment is needed to remove the limit. This would allow third parties to contribute to a fulsome debate on all CWB issues.

Description: The proposed Regulations would amend the Regulations respecting the Election of Directors of The Canadian Wheat Board (the Regulations) by repealing section 28 which currently establishes the limit on third-party spending on advertising.


I think I can see where this is going.

Kdrunkin1

Yes and you are correct the wheat board should be dismantled. I see that you are in Ontario so the wheat board has no jurisdiction in your area as it only encompasses the western provinces.

Bookish Agrarian

Horsefeathers. Why don't you take your ideological blinders off.

It has been shown time and again that the Conservatives will stoop to previously unheard of low to help out their friends in big business. Meanwhile independent studies keep showing the CWB has a net positive return for farmers.

jrootham

To spell out my position for the snaggle toothed bridge dweller crowd: I support the Wheat Board and the Single Desk marketing system. What is happening here is the Cons got beaten back by the elected board members when they tried to kill that system. Now they are setting it up so Cargill et al can spend as much as they like in trying to defeat the board members supporting the original purpose of the Wheat Board.

quote:

Originally posted by Kdrunkin1:
[b]Yes and you are correct the wheat board should be dismantled. I see that you are in Ontario so the wheat board has no jurisdiction in your area as it only encompasses the western provinces.[/b]

Farmpunk

I dunno. The last poll (vote?) taken on the issue - from the people most affected, the farmers - said that one third were in favour of no board, one third wanted some form of marketing choice with a board still in place, and one third wanted status quo.

I think it might be time for everyone to take off the blinders and dicuss various marketing options.

That the wheat board is a political issue that both left and right use as a plaything isn't serving the farmers' best interests. I assume that there are some farmers directly affected by the wheat board who have stopped paying attention because the issue has been taken over by the usual political bullshit.

However, I will bow to BA's much greater knowlege of the subject. My experience with boards and supply management in Ontario hasn't been the best.

Lard Tunderin Jeezus Lard Tunderin Jeezus's picture

quote:


one third wanted some form of marketing choice with a board still in place

...which of course is not an option at all, it is the slow demise of the board - which goes to show (along with Kdrunkin1's kneejerk) that the right-wing propaganda campaign is effectively confusing the issue.

Farmpunk

And goes to show that the concerns of all producers in question are not being acknowleged due to knee jerk non-farming community reactionaries with their own political axes to grind. For those folks, the wheat board is their cause celeb and never mind what the farmers have to say.

The lack of marketing options for farmers is not in any way progressive. And a middle road of supply management and marketing options are availible in many other ag products. Why is the wheat board so untouchable?

George Victor

Similar to medical insurance...without it, them what has, gets?

RosaL

quote:


Originally posted by Farmpunk:
[b] I assume that there are some farmers directly affected by the wheat board who have stopped paying attention because the issue has been taken over by the usual political bullshit.
[/b]

Farmers are as political as anyone else. There are heated debates going on in cafes and church basements all over rural Saskatchewan. They have not stopped paying attention!

Lard Tunderin Jeezus Lard Tunderin Jeezus's picture

quote:


And a middle road of supply management and marketing options are availible in many other ag products.

Do tell.

BTW, the Wheat Board has no limits on its 'marketing options', it can address as many markets as can be found.

Farmpunk

Poulty quota in Ontario. Currently under review by the Poultry producers of Ontario.

Currently a farmer without quota can raise and sell 300 birds, under a set of asinine regulations. The Poultry board is set to decide whether this practice can be continued. Three years ago groups like the Ecological Farmers Association of Ontario fought for these small flock rights - the EFAO wanted closer to a thousand birds allowed. The same Poultry producers are the ones who suggest free range and more naturally raised birds are more dangerous to public safety. Birds should be raised in barns, should be their logo. Operating outside the farm marketing system in Ontario's supply managed sectors bring with it stiff penalties and maybe a visit by a food safety SWAT team.

BC and Alberta, I believe, have poultry marketing systems that also allow for fairly sizeable operations outside the regulated group. 2000 kgs\year\producer, I think, for both.

Farmpunk

LTJ, to address your other point. I think the problem is that some farmers believe the Board is unable to market the wheat quickly enough to respond to a lightening fast market. Lack of markets isn't a problem, though I do believe the Board has it's favoured customers.

Lard Tunderin Jeezus Lard Tunderin Jeezus's picture

So we should allow small producers (up to, say, 300 bushels of grain) to market outside of the Marketing Board?

I can't see the reasoning, but if that's the happy compromise, okay.

CanadianNurse

I am a Saskatchewan farmer. Almost all the farmers that I know support the Wheat Board as it has been working forever - without the help of Stevie-boy and his business cronies. The referendum on what farmers wanted was purposefully so badly-worded that it was completely invalid (there were many articles written about it in Sk papers). PM had to be taken to court to stop some of his original illegal actions with the Wheat Board. He wants Cargill to have the profits - not the farmers. And he was the dude who was supposed to be all about representing Western Canada. What a joke.

Bookish Agrarian

quote:


Originally posted by Farmpunk:
[b]LTJ, to address your other point. I think the problem is that some farmers believe the Board is unable to market the wheat quickly enough to respond to a lightening fast market. Lack of markets isn't a problem, though I do believe the Board has it's favoured customers.[/b]

Actually farmpunk there are a large number of self-marketing tools under the CWB that farmers can access if they want. The real opposition to the CWB is entirely ideological. You can literally hear these guys talk about how Canada is a communist country and the like. My first trip out west I rented a car and traveled around parts of Saskatchewan and stopped off in places farmers gather just to get the real story. I was shocked to here some of the bizarre rhetoric out of some of these guys mouths.
When it comes down to it the CWB affects my farm not one whit. But I have met more than enough farmers who it does directly to believe I have a responsibility to bring the dirty tricks campaign of the current government to light as much as I can.

Farmpunk

I bow to the experience and knowlege of Maven and BA.

Bookish Agrarian

No,no farmpunk you raise legitimate concerns. But it is important to remember that there is a lot of big interests, who are no friends of farmers, waiting to rip the CWB apart and plunder farmers even more.

Farmpunk

I'm familiar with the divide and conquer strategies. Unfortunately, from my board\supply managed experience, sometimes the status quo works to preserve itself at the expense of small farmers.

I suppose that the fact that the wheat board is even a debatable issue is a good thing, because so much of agriculture is so far below the public's radar that most issues never even make it to the public's attention.

Bookish Agrarian

quote:


Originally posted by Farmpunk:
[b]I'm familiar with the divide and conquer strategies. Unfortunately, from my board\supply managed experience, sometimes the status quo works to preserve itself at the expense of small farmers.

I suppose that the fact that the wheat board is even a debatable issue is a good thing, because so much of agriculture is so far below the public's radar that most issues never even make it to the public's attention.[/b]


Have we ever talked about my experience with chicken quota - we should.

One of the things western farmers have told me, and these are small family farms, is that the CWB is what keeps them in business. Although there small family farms would be a substantial sized farm here in Ontario. Friends out west like to call our 100 acre home farm a garden
[img]smile.gif" border="0[/img]

Kdrunkin1

Double tap sorry.

[ 30 August 2008: Message edited by: Kdrunkin1 ]

Kdrunkin1

Are any of you in Ontario forced to deal the majority or all of your product through the CWB? If you do not then I suspect that you are the ones who should take off your ideological blinders.

[ 30 August 2008: Message edited by: Kdrunkin1 ]

Bookish Agrarian

I have a number of family farming in Manitoba and know a lot of farmers in the west that I am in regular contact with. Are you pretending that all, or even most western grain farmers want to see the end of the CWB. If you are then you are full of crap, full enough in fact I can smell it all the way from here.

Why don't you enlighten us on what exactly you can't do through the Wheat Board right now. Remember I am up on all the CWB programming so I will be able to smell bs from here too.

Kdrunkin1

quote:


Originally posted by Bookish Agrarian:
[b]I have a number of family farming in Manitoba and know a lot of farmers in the west that I am in regular contact with. Are you pretending that all, or even most western grain farmers want to see the end of the CWB. If you are then you are full of crap, full enough in fact I can smell it all the way from here.

Why don't you enlighten us on what exactly you can't do through the Wheat Board right now. Remember I am up on all the CWB programming so I will be able to smell bs from here too.[/b]


Farmers can't start farmer owned and supplied mills without having to buy the wheat through the board.
Farmers can't sell their grain at any time they want because the board has to open contracts before the farmers can sell.
The farmers can't sell their own grain in the USA if they want to. The market price in the US is generally way higher than here.
Farmers have to wait almost a year to get their final payment after possibly getting interim payments.

Now lets hear your rebuttal.

Brian White

I just got a conservative mailout attacking the wheat board. "the con government is acting to bring market freedom to canadas western barley produces. When we provide access to an open market, producers and consumers alike will be winners"
And thats horseshit. What actually happens in an open market is that farmers get shitty prices when they have a good harvest. (because they cannot store it very long they have to sell in the glut) (and the merchants can easily cartel and wait them out) and get decent prices only when there is almost nothing to harvest.
The price to consumers is kept floating by the middle men who buy from the farmers.
I saw my da almost have a mental breakdown when the "holy free market" decided his prices.
Another really bad thing about the free market is that farmers have to bet on which crops to sow 6 or 8 months in advance of harvest.
This often is like all the passengers in a plane running to the back or front.
It just aint safe to have food production decided by speculation on prices 8 months later.

quote:

Originally posted by Bookish Agrarian:
[b]Horsefeathers. Why don't you take your ideological blinders off.

It has been shown time and again that the Conservatives will stoop to previously unheard of low to help out their friends in big business. Meanwhile independent studies keep showing the CWB has a net positive return for farmers.[/b]


Kdrunkin1

quote:


Originally posted by Brian White:
[b]I just got a conservative mailout attacking the wheat board. "the con government is acting to bring market freedom to canadas western barley produces. When we provide access to an open market, producers and consumers alike will be winners"
And thats horseshit. What actually happens in an open market is that farmers get shitty prices when they have a good harvest. (because they cannot store it very long they have to sell in the glut) (and the merchants can easily cartel and wait them out) and get decent prices only when there is almost nothing to harvest.
The price to consumers is kept floating by the middle men who buy from the farmers.
I saw my da almost have a mental breakdown when the "holy free market" decided his prices.
Another really bad thing about the free market is that farmers have to bet on which crops to sow 6 or 8 months in advance of harvest.
This often is like all the passengers in a plane running to the back or front.
It just aint safe to have food production decided by speculation on prices 8 months later.
[/b]

You good sir are sorrily informed on your thinking. Why are you concerned with food prices but not fair market value for a farmers goods? Why should a board of directors with little or no farming background decide the price western Canadian grain farmers get for their product. Why is there not a lobby to get Ontario farmers and east into the CWB as it is the CANADIAN WHEAT BOARD after all.

Bookish Agrarian

quote:


Originally posted by Kdrunkin1:
[b]

Farmers can't start farmer owned and supplied mills without having to buy the wheat through the board.
Farmers can't sell their grain at any time they want because the board has to open contracts before the farmers can sell.
The farmers can't sell their own grain in the USA if they want to. The market price in the US is generally way higher than here.
Farmers have to wait almost a year to get their final payment after possibly getting interim payments.

Now lets hear your rebuttal.[/b]


I am really starting to wonder if you farm at all given the way you answered my challenge. It seems much more likely you have some Conservative talking points in front of you and are just repeating them.

But anyway here goes.


quote:

Farmers can't start farmer owned and supplied mills without having to buy the wheat through the board.

This depends on the size of the mill--there are exemptions for small operations. Large commercial would require western grown grain to be purchased from the Board. Grain bought from outside the CWB region could be brought in anytime with no restrictions. The Board does have an incentive payment though for grain which is milled in Canada. So when if someone sells wheat to the mill in Humboldt they get an extra payment from the CWB. The CWB also has a unique stock switching program which means that a farmer in Edmonton could invest in a mill in Swift Current, and then use the stock switching to direct his own quantity of grain through the mill without incurring any transportation costs--free transportation in other words, where else can you get free transport?


quote:

Farmers can't sell their grain at any time they want because the board has to open contracts before the farmers can sell.

Straight bullshit. Farmers that find a market that they like can enter into contracts directly with the buyer. The farmer then has to "buy-back" (which is a misnomer as it is merely a guarantee that the farmer is not undercutting Board pricing into any given market so no grain is actually bought back, just the guarentee of not undercutting other farmers) that quantity of grain and the farmer then ships directly to the buyer (this option is called the Producer Direct Sales Program). I have personally know people who used this system of selling into the US and organic buyers and brokers have always used this system (when they are operating legally).

quote:

The farmers can't sell their own grain in the USA if they want to.

Again, the situation above applies. Because the CWB price into the US will be different than the price into another destination, say Japan, the amount that the farmer must pay to compensate the pool (guarantee no undercutting) will vary by destination, but in this PDSP the farmer is making all of the decisions.

quote:

The market price in the US is generally way higher than here.

Sometimes a spot market price in the US is higher, and that's when the farmers should use the Producer Direct Sales Program. The farmer keeps anything extra over and above the CWB price into that particular market. The CWB routinely relies on capturing higher prices from US and Canadian millers to raise the pooled price.
It is unfair to always compare CWB prices to US spot prices because:
1. The US (and Canada) is many times an island of high prices--it turns out that this last year saw the CWB prices be at least $1 per bushel higher than the US weighted average prices.
2. 79% of CWB grain is sold outside of North America--the US and Canada cannot and will not absorb the entire Canadian crop.

quote:

Farmers have to wait almost a year to get their final payment after possibly getting interim payments.

Depending on when they sell through the pooling accounts farmers wait different amounts of time. If one sells in Aug. 08 one would wait until December 09 to get all of their money--16 months. If they sell in July of 09, they wait again until December 09--4 months. The waiting period is zero for farmers that access some of the new marketing programs offered by the CWB. The Early Payment Option has been offered by the CWB for a few years now, and the new FlexPro Option is offered this year as well. And organic farmers operate under a different option again with no waiting period whatsoever unless they have used the PSDP for their particular sale.
As well, if the Federal government would not drag its heels the CWB would offer quicker interim payments when they see how their sales program is progressing. At present the CWB needs government approval because Harper's government has refused to let the CWB take over responsibility for the interim payments. As well farmers in regions outside the CWB, like Ontario can often wait simular amounts of time from contracting to receiving final payment.

Bookish Agrarian

quote:


Originally posted by Kdrunkin1:
[b]

You good sir are sorrily informed on your thinking. Why are you concerned with food prices but not fair market value for a farmers goods? Why should a board of directors with little or no farming background decide the price western Canadian grain farmers get for their product. Why is there not a lobby to get Ontario farmers and east into the CWB as it is the CANADIAN WHEAT BOARD after all.[/b]


This is straight out bullshit. The CWB board is made up of farmers and government appointments. Until the Conservatives started manipulating the process government appointees were placed on the Board for their expertise and knowledge. Now the main criteria is that they support destroying the Board, including board farmer candidates that were blown out in their regions by pro-single desk candidates.

This thread is about the Conservative government now allowing third parties - read corporate interests- to bankroll anti-wheat board farmer candidates who have been unable to win in straight-forward, fair and open elections of their peers. Unfortunetly there are always a small few that are willing to sell out the neighbours for a few shekels of silver

If you are such a supporter of freedom how could you be in favour of third party manipulation
.
Ontario has its own Wheat Board already. It is called, surprisingly, the Ontario Wheat Board. The fact you seem to be so woefully unaware of the situation suggests to me that you do not really farm, either that or you are so ideologically seduced you have no ability to recognize reality from right wing fantasy.

Again, how is your farm operation, assuming you have one, specifically negatively effected by the CWB. Facts, not just more bs rhetoric.

[ 02 September 2008: Message edited by: Bookish Agrarian ]

Aristotleded24

quote:


Originally posted by Kdrunkin1:
[b]Why should a board of directors with little or no farming background decide the price western Canadian grain farmers get for their product.[/b]

A board of directors elected by the farmers themselves.

Left J.A.B.

Game, Set, Match Bookish Agrarian