Lowest Liberal Vote Since 1867
Wed, 2008-10-15 20:36
#1
Malcolm
Lowest Liberal Vote Since 1867
Wed, 2008-10-15 20:36
#2
Malcolm
Yes, that's right - 1867. Not 1967. 1867.
Wed, 2008-10-15 20:36
#3
Malcolm
Yes, that's right - 1867. Not 1967. 1867.
Wed, 2008-10-15 20:36
#4
Malcolm
Yes, that's right - 1867. Not 1967. 1867.
Wed, 2008-10-15 20:36
#5
Malcolm
Yes, that's right - 1867. Not 1967. 1867.
Wed, 2008-10-15 20:38
#6
Interested Observer
Well it does not surprise me considering how canadians think of politics today. Many people do not associate themselves with a political party, or a class for that matter, and many do not even know what left or right even means.
Wed, 2008-10-15 20:38
#7
Interested Observer
Well it does not surprise me considering how canadians think of politics today. Many people do not associate themselves with a political party, or a class for that matter, and many do not even know what left or right even means.
Wed, 2008-10-15 20:38
#8
Interested Observer
Well it does not surprise me considering how canadians think of politics today. Many people do not associate themselves with a political party, or a class for that matter, and many do not even know what left or right even means.
Wed, 2008-10-15 20:38
#9
Interested Observer
Well it does not surprise me considering how canadians think of politics today. Many people do not associate themselves with a political party, or a class for that matter, and many do not even know what left or right even means.
Wed, 2008-10-15 21:04
#10
Horseshit.
What about population growth?
and women getting the vote?
Wed, 2008-10-15 21:04
#11
Horseshit.
What about population growth?
and women getting the vote?
Wed, 2008-10-15 21:04
#12
Horseshit.
What about population growth?
and women getting the vote?
Wed, 2008-10-15 21:04
#13
Horseshit.
What about population growth?
and women getting the vote?
Wed, 2008-10-15 21:05
#14
I believe that Malcolm is talking percentage.
Wed, 2008-10-15 21:05
#15
I believe that Malcolm is talking percentage.
Wed, 2008-10-15 21:05
#16
I believe that Malcolm is talking percentage.
Wed, 2008-10-15 21:05
#17
I believe that Malcolm is talking percentage.
Wed, 2008-10-15 21:11
#18
Malcolm
quote:
Originally posted by Threads:
[b]I believe that Malcolm is talking percentage.[/b]
Thanks, Threads.
I'd have tought even the thickest Liberal would have been able to follow,
'Parently not.
Wed, 2008-10-15 21:11
#19
Malcolm
quote:
Originally posted by Threads:
[b]I believe that Malcolm is talking percentage.[/b]
Thanks, Threads.
I'd have tought even the thickest Liberal would have been able to follow,
'Parently not.
Wed, 2008-10-15 21:11
#20
Malcolm
quote:
Originally posted by Threads:
[b]I believe that Malcolm is talking percentage.[/b]
Thanks, Threads.
I'd have tought even the thickest Liberal would have been able to follow,
'Parently not.
Wed, 2008-10-15 21:11
#21
Malcolm
quote:
Originally posted by Threads:
[b]I believe that Malcolm is talking percentage.[/b]
Thanks, Threads.
I'd have tought even the thickest Liberal would have been able to follow,
'Parently not.
Wed, 2008-10-15 21:13
#22
I voted NDP,
how thick is that?
Would you vote for someone who withdrew from the election.
ditto on thick,
buddy.
quote:
Originally posted by Malcolm:
[b]
Thanks, Threads.I'd have tought even the thickest Liberal would have been able to follow,
'Parently not.[/b]
Wed, 2008-10-15 21:13
#23
I voted NDP,
how thick is that?
Would you vote for someone who withdrew from the election.
ditto on thick,
buddy.
quote:
Originally posted by Malcolm:
[b]
Thanks, Threads.I'd have tought even the thickest Liberal would have been able to follow,
'Parently not.[/b]
Wed, 2008-10-15 21:13
#24
I voted NDP,
how thick is that?
Would you vote for someone who withdrew from the election.
ditto on thick,
buddy.
quote:
Originally posted by Malcolm:
[b]
Thanks, Threads.I'd have tought even the thickest Liberal would have been able to follow,
'Parently not.[/b]
Wed, 2008-10-15 21:13
#25
I voted NDP,
how thick is that?
Would you vote for someone who withdrew from the election.
ditto on thick,
buddy.
quote:
Originally posted by Malcolm:
[b]
Thanks, Threads.I'd have tought even the thickest Liberal would have been able to follow,
'Parently not.[/b]
Wed, 2008-10-15 21:25
#26
Malcolm
quote:
Originally posted by Brian White:
[b]I voted NDP,
how thick is that?
Would you vote for someone who withdrew from the election.
ditto on thick,
buddy.
[/b]
From what I've read in your other childish rants, you're a Liberal who loaned us your vote, and your pissed that we aren't all swooning in gratitude.
If you don't want to grow up and discuss the topic, why don't you just get your bottle and go back to bed?
[ 15 October 2008: Message edited by: Malcolm ]
Wed, 2008-10-15 21:25
#27
Malcolm
quote:
Originally posted by Brian White:
[b]I voted NDP,
how thick is that?
Would you vote for someone who withdrew from the election.
ditto on thick,
buddy.
[/b]
From what I've read in your other childish rants, you're a Liberal who loaned us your vote, and your pissed that we aren't all swooning in gratitude.
If you don't want to grow up and discuss the topic, why don't you just get your bottle and go back to bed?
[ 15 October 2008: Message edited by: Malcolm ]
Wed, 2008-10-15 21:25
#28
Malcolm
quote:
Originally posted by Brian White:
[b]I voted NDP,
how thick is that?
Would you vote for someone who withdrew from the election.
ditto on thick,
buddy.
[/b]
From what I've read in your other childish rants, you're a Liberal who loaned us your vote, and your pissed that we aren't all swooning in gratitude.
If you don't want to grow up and discuss the topic, why don't you just get your bottle and go back to bed?
[ 15 October 2008: Message edited by: Malcolm ]
Wed, 2008-10-15 21:25
#29
Malcolm
quote:
Originally posted by Brian White:
[b]I voted NDP,
how thick is that?
Would you vote for someone who withdrew from the election.
ditto on thick,
buddy.
[/b]
From what I've read in your other childish rants, you're a Liberal who loaned us your vote, and your pissed that we aren't all swooning in gratitude.
If you don't want to grow up and discuss the topic, why don't you just get your bottle and go back to bed?
[ 15 October 2008: Message edited by: Malcolm ]
Thu, 2008-10-16 13:19
#30
Malcolm
Apologies to M Spector. I didn't realize that a thread could still be brought up off of the archived pages. Some message boards won't let you.
Thu, 2008-10-16 13:19
#31
Malcolm
Apologies to M Spector. I didn't realize that a thread could still be brought up off of the archived pages. Some message boards won't let you.
Thu, 2008-10-16 13:19
#32
Malcolm
Apologies to M Spector. I didn't realize that a thread could still be brought up off of the archived pages. Some message boards won't let you.
Thu, 2008-10-16 13:19
#33
Malcolm
Apologies to M Spector. I didn't realize that a thread could still be brought up off of the archived pages. Some message boards won't let you.
Thu, 2008-10-16 22:06
#34
Malcolm
Bump.
Just cause I like to read the thread title.
Thu, 2008-10-16 22:06
#35
Malcolm
Bump.
Just cause I like to read the thread title.
Thu, 2008-10-16 22:06
#36
Malcolm
Bump.
Just cause I like to read the thread title.
Thu, 2008-10-16 22:06
#37
Malcolm
Bump.
Just cause I like to read the thread title.
Fri, 2008-10-17 00:19
#38
quote:
Originally posted by Malcolm:
[b]Yes, that's right - 1867. Not 1967. 1867.[/b]
It is possible they did worse than any election INCLUDING 1867, since a large proportion of the popular vote in that election is unknown.
Also, in those days there was a tradition of "loose fish", who would run and join whichever party formed the government. It was an effective way to get patronage for your riding.
Fri, 2008-10-17 00:19
#39
quote:
Originally posted by Malcolm:
[b]Yes, that's right - 1867. Not 1967. 1867.[/b]
It is possible they did worse than any election INCLUDING 1867, since a large proportion of the popular vote in that election is unknown.
Also, in those days there was a tradition of "loose fish", who would run and join whichever party formed the government. It was an effective way to get patronage for your riding.
Fri, 2008-10-17 00:19
#40
quote:
Originally posted by Malcolm:
[b]Yes, that's right - 1867. Not 1967. 1867.[/b]
It is possible they did worse than any election INCLUDING 1867, since a large proportion of the popular vote in that election is unknown.
Also, in those days there was a tradition of "loose fish", who would run and join whichever party formed the government. It was an effective way to get patronage for your riding.
Fri, 2008-10-17 00:19
#41
quote:
Originally posted by Malcolm:
[b]Yes, that's right - 1867. Not 1967. 1867.[/b]
It is possible they did worse than any election INCLUDING 1867, since a large proportion of the popular vote in that election is unknown.
Also, in those days there was a tradition of "loose fish", who would run and join whichever party formed the government. It was an effective way to get patronage for your riding.
Fri, 2008-10-17 00:46
#42
Malcolm
However you cut it, I like the headline.
Would it be sweeter if it was "since Confederation?"
Mebbe
Fri, 2008-10-17 00:46
#43
Malcolm
However you cut it, I like the headline.
Would it be sweeter if it was "since Confederation?"
Mebbe
Fri, 2008-10-17 00:46
#44
Malcolm
However you cut it, I like the headline.
Would it be sweeter if it was "since Confederation?"
Mebbe
Fri, 2008-10-17 00:46
#45
Malcolm
However you cut it, I like the headline.
Would it be sweeter if it was "since Confederation?"
Mebbe
Fri, 2008-10-17 01:15
#46
Here's Wikipedia's entry on the 1867 general election, with percentage vote shares for all parties:
[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_federal_election,_1867]http://en.w...
Fri, 2008-10-17 01:15
#47
Here's Wikipedia's entry on the 1867 general election, with percentage vote shares for all parties:
[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_federal_election,_1867]http://en.w...
Fri, 2008-10-17 01:15
#48
Here's Wikipedia's entry on the 1867 general election, with percentage vote shares for all parties:
[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_federal_election,_1867]http://en.w...
Fri, 2008-10-17 01:15
#49
Here's Wikipedia's entry on the 1867 general election, with percentage vote shares for all parties:
[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_federal_election,_1867]http://en.w...
Fri, 2008-10-17 01:33
#50
Shit show Liberals. That'll teach them.
Fri, 2008-10-17 01:33
#51
Shit show Liberals. That'll teach them.