Harper Back Pedals on Conservative Ideology

7 posts / 0 new
Last post
Red Rambler
Harper Back Pedals on Conservative Ideology

The Canadian Press reports that “at the 2008 Conservative Convention
the party brass made every attempt to keep the grassroots from rocking
the policy boat, including a very public admonition from Harper that
pragmatism - not ideology - must guide the government in these
difficult economic times.'

“(D)elegates were urged to take a
more practical view of policy-making” and that they “...seemed to
understand the need to put some conservative reforms on the back
burner.”

You have to feel some sympathy for our Prime Minister
struggling to rid himself of the albatross of Conservative policies and
so-called reforms. The poor fellow, forced to admonish his own party
faithful to be pragmatic and shuck their right-wing ideology (at least
temporarily). How embarrassing!

The PM, unlike, many members of
the Conservative Party, understands that his government does not have
the political mandate (37% of the vote) to foist right-of-centre
legislation and programs on the Canadian public. He is also shrewd
enough to realize that policies based on conservative ideology are in
his words “...unrealistic...in dealing with the complex economic
challenges that face us.” This is a truly startling admission to come
from the mouth of the #1 conservative in the country.

Although
Harper promised to examine all resolutions at the convention it was
made clear that his government is under no obligation to adopt them.
This prompted former Reform leader and party stalwart, Preston Manning
to quip, “Don't ask people for their input if you aren't going to use
it, because that just reinforces their cynicism about the system.”

An
embittered, cynical Manning and his fellow Reformers thought that by
foisting themselves on the PC party and adopting the label
“Conservatives” that their far-right notions and fantasies would gain a
cloak of respectability. Not so, the Canadian public is not fooled.

Harper
and the more moderate members of his party realize that they must nudge
their party left, at minimum to the political centre, to credibly
govern the country and have any hope of eventually forming a majority
government.

DrConway

Presto has no room to talk. Murray Dobbin documented how Presto cherry-picked from the Reform platform when it was first drawn up by majority vote of the new caucus, most of whom at the time were essentially Prairie Populists rather than die-hard right-wingers.

 

Tommy_Paine

"The Canadian Press reports that “at the 2008 Conservative Convention
the party brass made every attempt to keep the grassroots from rocking
the policy boat, including a very public admonition from Harper that
pragmatism - not ideology - must guide the government in these
difficult economic times.' "

 Makes one wonder what riches we missed out on in good economic times when ideology ruled and pragmatism was thrown out.

DrConway

BUT BUT BUT DEFICIT HELL OR HIGH WATER FREELOADING WELFARE BUMS TAX CUTS TAX CUTS TAX CUTS

 You know, all the last twenty years can basically be summarized by the above statement of the collective total of all the yammering done in the media and in literature, none of which has worked to the better of anyone except people like the Aspers.

Lard Tunderin Jeezus Lard Tunderin Jeezus's picture

Red Rambler wrote:

An embittered, cynical Manning and his fellow Reformers thought that by foisting themselves on the PC party and adopting the label “Conservatives” that their far-right notions and fantasies would gain acloak of respectability. Not so, the Canadian public is not fooled.

Harper and the more moderate members of his party realize that they must nudgetheir party left, at minimum to the political centre, to crediblygovern the country and have any hope of eventually forming a majoritygovernment.

That's a rather significant historical revision.

Harper might be one of the moderate members of the party elite now (though I'm dubious), but that is after several purges of the truly moderate conservatives who once accounted for a significant portion of the Party's highest ranks, electing the likes of Stanfield and Clark to their leadership. Such past leaders are ridiculed and scorned by the Harperites.

And even Preston Manning was more moderate than Harper could stomach, which led to Harper leading the Alliance putsch against the former Reform Party leader.

thorin_bane

Lets not forget the number of libs that left because of the hard right stand the cons had. Belinda, K Martin, Brison et el. I think the 2 latter had more to do with social policy than fiscal, but I'm splitting hairs. When your party thinks clement baird and flaherty are leftish you know you are rightwing. Ain't that right firewall steve.

Lord Palmerston

From what I understand, the Red Tories were essentially defeated in the early 80s.  Mulroney was the candidate of choice for the neoconservatives.