Canada's quagmire: The war in Afghanistan

Apparently Sweden has its own conservative political contigent. Who knew? Are we supposed to be shocked by this?

Unionist, I have started another "Still Losing the War" thread with a post about this latest evidence that "we" are losing the war.

This present thread is a continuation of the thread entitled, "NDP Embrace War in Afghanistan" which was in the Canadian Politics section.

Please don't ask me why this thread is in the "Introductions" section.

Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true. - Homer Simpson

Since this is the continuation of the "NDP Embrace War in Afghanistan" thread, this item goes here:

Paul Kellogg wrote:

December 6, on the second day of the biennial (every two years) convention of the Canadian Peace Alliance, 100 or so delegates and observers gathered in the bitter cold on the sidewalk outside the student centre at Ryerson University in Toronto. Behind a massive banner and carrying dozens of placards saying "Troops Out of Afghanistan" we marched to join the 3,000 strong anti-Harper rally taking place that day at City Hall. We took the streets, and as our little contingent turned the last corner before arriving at City Hall, we took up the chant, "Harper Out of Ottawa, Canada Out of Afghanistan." [b]The message couldn't have been clearer - no matter what government is in office, there is a movement on the streets telling any who will listen, Afghanistan is still the issue.[/b]

Most in the crowd greeted us with enthusiasm. [b]Thousands of NDP members have been central to the anti-war movement. But Jack Layton has told them that the Afghanistan file is on the shelf while he pursues the increasingly forlorn project of coalescing with the Liberals. Suddenly, it is not at all clear that the NDP federal leadership considers it "legitimate" to be against Harper and against the war at the same time. The CPA contingent gave voice again to the crowd that was in its vast majority anti-war. The reception was fantastic (except for some disgruntled senior Liberal Party members). It was a moment when all present were very proud to be part of Canada's anti-war movement. Opposing the war in Afghanistan is not a bargaining chip to be used in parliamentary coalition negotiations. It is a non-negotiable matter of principle. The troops must come home. The killing must stop.[/b]

The convention was an intense three-day event, December 5 to 7, which brought together elected delegates from 39 anti-war and peace organizations from across the country. Together with observers, more than 100 people attended.

The central decision of the conference was the adoption of a two-year "Campaign Goals, Strategy and Actions." The delegates unanimously agreed that for the next two years, the war in Afghanistan and the War Resisters Campaign would be the strategic focuses for the CPA. The plan commits the CPA to two bi-national demonstrations against the war in Afghanistan each year, one in the spring, one in the autumn. The first one in 2009 will be held in the first week of April to coincide with the call from anti-war groups in Europe to mark the 60th anniversary of the creation of NATO - the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, which is prosecuting the brutal war in Afghanistan....

The coming months will not be easy. In Canada, the Afghanistan issue has become confused because of the actions of the Coalition. In the United States, the election of Barack Obama has rightly excited millions. But while Obama is committed to winding down the war in Iraq, he is equally committed to a major escalation in Afghanistan. He is using his massive popularity to argue that Afghanistan is the "good war," an argument that will confuse many people.

[url=http://www.poleconanalysis.org/2008/12/afghanistan-is-still-issue-anti-w... more[/u][/url]

[img]http://www.free-blinkies.com/blinkie-maker/img/777629001229223584.gif[/img]

Why stop with the "NDP embraces phony war on terror in the Stan"?

Why not follow that logic to its full conclusion with, "NDP supports 9-11 snow job and the phony war on terror in Iraq" as well?

It all makes so much sense to us now. The NDP is infiltrated by the CIA. It had to happen.

We should then conclude that: the NDP supports herr Harper's U.S. style spending on military buildup and kowtowing to Crazy Jorge de la Yayo's war on democracy in general.

I might even be tempted to think that NDP is for all this neoliberal mumbo jumbo since Brian Baloney's time in the sun. Who knew?

Of course and while we're on a roll here, let's also not mention that the NDP's parliamentary request to restart a federal study on electoral reform was quashed by Whigs and Tories in May of 2007.

The NDP doesnt quit on Canadians - that's Harper's job - when he does show up for work in Ottawa.