ONDP Leadership Thread IV: Countdown

109 posts / 0 new
Last post
aka Mycroft
ONDP Leadership Thread IV: Countdown
madmax

Considering the III Leadership thread appears closed.  I just thought that Lost in Bruce County picked a good name.

Lost in Bruce County. You couldn't have been more wrong, and the comments against Andrea Horwath is not a simple misunderstanding but a massive slur against her.  

Yet you still managed to get in a shame on Andrea afterwards.

I believe a "Shame on you" is in order. As an observer on babble, It became apparent to me a yarn was being spun. A few quick clicks on google, and I instantly learned about these Hamilton Candidates and the ridings, East/west/Centre.  

Fact is, I knew far far less then you pretended to know. But a simple online check could show how incorrect you were.

Its not too often someone gets such a thorough shellacking.  Sunday Hat proved you 100% WRONG. Infact it doesn't get anymore WRONG then what you fabricated and posted as fact.

The parting shot you end with, shows how little you understand when you post fabrications and misinformation on a discussion forum.  You tried to paint a picture of someone that is absolutely false.

Your credibility for future posts will be suspect. 

 

melovesproles

As a spectator in BC, I wanted to root for Andrea Horwath, it would be nice for the NDP to field an energetic strong young woman leader in contrast to those two tired old clowns leading the Tories and Liberals but based on the interviews on rabble I have to agree that Tabuns comes off sounding a lot clearer about how to make the NDP relevant again in Ontario, some of Horwath's answers are really cringeworthy.  Bisson and Prue both sound like mistakes although Prues position on having a debate on the seperate school system sounds reasonable enough. 

Sunday Hat

Lost in Bruce County said:

"I had heard about Andrea supporting Roy from several long time Hamiltonian NPD'ers this past weekend. To my credit, I did perform several Google searches and nothing came up... Andrea did refuse to support Kelly Hayes from the CLC and instead endorsed Liberal Bob Bratina who continues to hold Andrea's old seat today. Shame on Andrea!"

One problem: Kelly Hayes didn't run in the 2004 by-election.

I think a moderator may want to chat with Lost in Bruce County. Babble policy is pretty clear: "you will not use this discussion board to post any material that is knowingly false and/or defamatory" I'll give LinBC the benefit of the doubt and assume that the first falsehood was an accident but now we have two. It's really not cool.

social democrat

Whatever happened to all the "Peggy Nash For ONDP Leader" babblers who at one early date were dominating discussion here?  Presumably, they are all now voting for Tabuns, since he has a Nash endorsement?

aka Mycroft

Is it too soon to start making predictions?

I think the first ballot will be:

Tabuns

Horwath

Bisson

Prue 

 

peterjcassidy peterjcassidy's picture

Sunday Hat wrote:

Lost in Bruce County said:

"I had heard about Andrea supporting Roy from several long time Hamiltonian NPD'ers this past weekend. To my credit, I did perform several Google searches and nothing came up... Andrea did refuse to support Kelly Hayes from the CLC and instead endorsed Liberal Bob Bratina who continues to hold Andrea's old seat today. Shame on Andrea!"

One problem: Kelly Hayes didn't run in the 2004 by-election.

I think a moderator may want to chat with Lost in Bruce County. Babble policy is pretty clear: "you will not use this discussion board to post any material that is knowingly false and/or defamatory" I'll give LinBC the benefit of the doubt and assume that the first falsehood was an accident but now we have two. It's really not cool.

 i don't want to go public about  the internal battles of the NDP on Hamilton but

We are talking bout the municipal seat vacated by Andrea,  not about the  Hamilton East by-election.  What the sister  from the Bruce is is saying about that municipal seat is basically correct. Andrea did not support  Kelly Hayes, a stong woman,  trade unionist  and New Democrat  who wanted to run in the  race to fill that municipal seat.  The sister from the Bruce is also basically correct .about the nomination race in Hamilton West to replace Dave Christopherson when he left provincial politics.. There were stong arguments for affirmative action,  including policy of the ONDP,  when an incumbent seat becomes vacant.   Roy Adams, a straight white male ,won that race after a few ballots over a woman of colour with strong credentials, a :LGBTQ woman and the male president of the labour council.   In defense of truth I must say Andrea has rarely has been on the side of affirmative action in Hamilton NDP politics, tending to align with white male baby-boomers Wink

George Victor

 meloves:

"As a spectator in BC, I wanted to root for Andrea Horwath, it would be nice for the NDP to field an energetic strong young woman leader in contrast to those two tired old clowns leading the Tories and Liberals but based on the interviews on rabble I have to agree that Tabuns comes off sounding a lot clearer about how to make the NDP relevant again in Ontario, some of Horwath's answers are really cringeworthy.  Bisson and Prue both sound like mistakes although Prues position on having a debate on the seperate school system sounds reasonable enough. "

-----------------------------------------------------------

When you hear Tabuns "sounding a lot clearer about how to make the NDP relevant again in Ontario", are you responding to your own inclinations, or putting yourself in the position of the people who will be voting?

Exactly.  It's not an intellectual exercise for folks "out there".

And for the same reason, Prue on school debates is far from "reasonable enough". "Reason" has little to do with decisions by the great out there. 

 

melovesproles

Quote:
When you hear Tabuns "sounding a lot clearer about how to make the NDP relevant again in Ontario", are you responding to your own inclinations, or putting yourself in the position of the people who will be voting?

Oh yah, totally my own inclinations, I definitely don't have my finger on the pulse of the Ontarioan voter. I just didn't like Horwath's answers, the one on the 'Get Orange' campaign sounded very defeatist, I realize that the media went into spin mode with Tory's comments on public schools but I think lessons can always be learned and this doesn't do it for me: "We could have had the most perfect campaign in the world and it still wouldn't have gotten through the Liberal's brilliant move to pull that piece out of the Tory playbook and ram it like a wedge."

As for Tabuns, I wanted to not like him from what I've read on here, 'establishment candidate' ect. But I thought he sounded like he had a good handle on the issues and I think a green-Dipper leader would be a good move, maybe it won't vault the party into power but the environment as an issue isn't going to go away despite the media's attention currently being elsewhere.

But I'm not saying you're wrong, Horwath might be a much more dynamic and succesful leader than Tabuns, I haven't seen that much of either of them.   

Sunday Hat

Jesus Christ. This campaign is getting sleazy.

Peterjcassidy is now repeating the lie that was debunked in a previous thread - that Andrea Horwath refused to back a woman for the NDP nomination in Hamilton West in 2003. This is a straight-out lie as the article below shows.

--

Myrie pursues NDP Hamilton West seat
The Hamilton Spectator
Tuesday, January 21, 2003
Page: A05
Section: News
Source: The Hamilton Spectator

A Spectator columnist and social development consultant wants to represent Hamilton West and the NDP in the next provincial election.

Evelyn Myrie, owner of an art shop and the co-chair of Hamilton's Black History Committee, announced her decision to try to replace outgoing MPP David Christopherson yesterday.

"We have good representation right now and I'd like to carry that mantle and have a strong voice at Queen's Park," Myrie said. "Ontarians deserve access to affordable housing, quality education and health care, child-care and affordable public power."

Wayne Marston, public school board trustee and head of Hamilton's labour council, announced his intention to run last week.

Myrie said she would be "a people's politician -- someone who listens to the public, validating their concerns."

Ward 2 Councillor Andrea Horwath chose not to throw her hat in the ring for the NDP Hamilton West nomination, but threw her support behind Myrie instead.

"She is a bright, energetic woman who brings many perspectives to the table that will only enrich the debate," Horwath stated in the release.

The provincial election is expected next spring.

---

I doubt this will affect anyone's vote but I think this is beyond the realm of fair campaigning and certainly counter to the rules on babble.

foxymoron

so, for the sake of clarity, let's um...clarify exactly what's being discussed here.

are we discussing a byelection for a provincial seat, or for a municipal council seat?

 

peterjcassidy peterjcassidy's picture

foxymoron wrote:

so, for the sake of clarity, let's um...clarify exactly what's being discussed here.

are we discussing a byelection for a provincial seat, or for a municipal council seat?

 

 

 

We are talking bout the municipal seat vacated by Andrea,  not about the  Hamilton East by-election.  What the sister  from the Bruce is is saying about that municipal seat is basically correct. Andrea did not support  Kelly Hayes, a stong woman,  trade unionist  and New Democrat  who wanted to run in the  race to fill that municipal seat. 

 

How many more times do I have to put it in bold before  Sunday Hat recognizes that I am talking about the municipal.  seat.

and when the sister from the Bruce talks about Andrea's old seat stilll held by Bob Bratina  do I have to repeat  it is a  municipal seat we are talking about? Ward 2 to be precise in the municipality  of Hamilton-fomerly held by muncipal councillor Andrea Horwath now held by muncipal councillor Bob Bratina.?

And I do not appreciate being called a liar and accused of sleazy campaigning when I defend a sister subject to a scurrilious attackby respectully pointing out the truth. I think the moderator should be called in.

 

 

 

Sunday Hat

This is insane. There are two campaigns being discussed.

First off, in the municipal race, Andrea is being criticized for not supporting a woman named Kelly Hayes. Except she never ran. That's a crucial fact.

Secondly, a provincial race is mentioned in this thread. In this post in fact. Peterjcassidy implies that Horwath didn't back a "woman of colour with strong credentials".

The woman of color with strong credentials was Evelyn Myrie and Andrea Horwath did in fact endorse her.

So, peter, you're lying again.

And you're lying about lying. Which is pretty mindblowing considering it's here for everyone to read.

And I can't believe you've lured me into wasting my time on this.

RevolutionPlease RevolutionPlease's picture

Great, more mudslinging at our own allies.

candle

peterjcassidy wrote:

The sister from the Bruce is also basically correct .about the nomination race in Hamilton West to replace Dave Christopherson when he left provincial politics.. There were stong arguments for affirmative action,  including policy of the ONDP,  when an incumbent seat becomes vacant.   Roy Adams, a straight white male ,won that race after a few ballots over a woman of colour with strong credentials, a :LGBTQ woman and the male president of the labour council.   In defense of truth I must say Andrea has rarely has been on the side of affirmative action in Hamilton NDP politics, tending to align with white male baby-boomers Wink

 

sure sounds to me that you were talking about the provincial by-election in this part of your post and basically agreeing with what Lost In Bruce County said.

 

 

spatrioter

Maybe there should be a separate thread for men to discuss why Andrea Horwath isn't a good enough feminist, and we can proceed with leadership discussion here.

foxymoron

wow...hamilton politics sounds way more entertaining than toronto!Wink

Sunday Hat

I could make Toronto politics sound pretty interesting if I made shit up.

Peter Tabuns is having a love affair with a goat! It's TOTALLY TRUE. If you want proof watch me bold random text.

Undecided

RevolutionPlease RevolutionPlease's picture

lol, I thought he was posting links at first.

peterjcassidy peterjcassidy's picture

I have asked the moderators to intervene., but perhaps we can settle this somewhat amicably?  Sunday Hat ,will you acknowledge that when the sister from the Bruce stated that Andrea endorsed Bob Bratina rather than supporting Kelly Hayes, she was tal;ling about the municipal seat, not about the 2004 provincial by-election?

 While I don'tt want to discuss Hamilton NDP internal battles publicly  I can tell you from my own involvment in such matters that Kelly Hayes was interested in running for the municipal seat when Andrea, having won the provincial  by-election ,vacated the municipal seat. When Andrea would not support her, this was one reason Kelly  did not run for the municipal seat.

.As part of that acknpwledgment it would be nice if you would withdraw your claim that the sister and I are liars.  Frown

For my part I am willing to acknowledge that publicly Andrea supported Evelyn for the Hamilton Wes tNDP provincial nomination.

------------------------

"Andrea did refuse to support Kelly Hayes from the CLC and instead endorsed Liberal Bob Bratina who continues to hold Andrea's old seat today. Shame on Andrea!"

One problem: Kelly Hayes didn't run in the 2004 by-election.

I think a moderator may want to chat with Lost in Bruce County. Babble policy is pretty clear: "you will not use this discussion board to post any material that is knowingly false and/or defamatory" I'll give LinBC the benefit of the doubt and assume that the first falsehood was an accident but now we have two. It's really not cool".

 

Lord Palmerston

I think Bisson is likely to come out on top in the first round, but few people will have him as their second choice.

Sunday Hat

I have to say I don't find it a huge concession on your part to admit that Evelyn Myrie got Horwath's endorsement in 2003. I produced a news article from the time that established that pretty defininitively already.

If you could produce the same sort of documentation concerning Horwath's alleged decision to chase Kelly Hayes out of the race I'd love to see it.

If you can't (and I suspect that may be the case) then I suggest that you might want to stop posting stuff that you can't prove, in addition to your new pledge to stop posting stuff that is completely inaccurate.

Frankly, after the crap you've pulled I don't think people will be inclined to "take your word" on things. Your memory and the facts don't gel very well.

Sunday Hat

I don't think he'll come out on top but he could finish strong.

Agreement that he won't grow much after that.

foxymoron

mycroft, care to make some book on the results?

my sense of the first ballot remains the same. no one--no one--can take anything for granted. tabuns ran out of steam weeks ago. his aura of inevitability punctured, he never proved he could take a punch, never proved he had any growth potential. indeed, he sorta reached his peter principle, as it were.

no doubt andrea has had a good week and some big endorsements, but the white noise emanating from her supporters suggest that they're afraid their own candidate can't take a hit, either. she's spent an inordinate amount of time wrapping herself in an obama mantle--community organizer, looks different from the competition. but she's not obama, as much as some would like to believe she represents our version. she's not, and it shows, and the more and more the rank and file see it, the more and more they realize she isn't ready for primetime.

when jack was elected leader, approx. 30 per cent of voters waited til convention to cast. i imagine this race will see much the same pattern. no one, but no one has the votes to carry on the first like jack did. 

my guessing is on first ballot is:

1. Horwath

2. Prue

3. Tabuns (mymymy what a difference a few weeks make)

4. Bisson

What shall we wager, dear mycroft?

 

Scott Piatkowski Scott Piatkowski's picture

peterjcassidy wrote:
The sister from the Bruce is also basically correct .about the nomination race in Hamilton West to replace Dave Christopherson when he left provincial politics.

So, Peter, let's clarify here:

Are you still backing this claim about the provincial nomination race -- one that that has been refuted twice by Sunday Hat? Are you still denying this that you've done so?

For everyone's information, Hamilton West wasn't a by-election. David Christopherson didn't run for re-election as MPP in 2003 because he was running for Mayor of Hamilton. He was subsequently elected as MP for Hamilton Centre in 2004. He's backing Andrea Horwath for leader.

Scott Piatkowski Scott Piatkowski's picture

If Mycroft and Foxy make a bet, how is the winner going to collect?

FWIW, it's nice to see that Prue's tracking has Andrea is first, but I suspect that Mycroft may be right to place her in second (fairly close behind Tabuns, I would suggest). But, as the overwhelming second choice among Prue and Bisson supporters (I'm basing this on my own phoning and conversations with activists), I still like her odds of winning on a second or third ballot.

wage zombie

My prediction is:

1st ballot - Tabuns, Bisson, Horwath, Prue

2nd ballot - Tabuns, Horwath, Bisson

3rd ballot - Horwath, Tabuns 

aka Mycroft

Notwithstanding the animosity between Prue and Tabuns camps I think most of Prue's Toronto supporters will have Tabuns as their second choice. Bisson's supporters second choice is more likely to be Horwath. The more ballots it takes the harder it will be for Tabuns to win.

The way it's going now Horwath could end up with 2/3 to 3/4 of the labour vote if it goes to a fourth ballot. Steel is 68% of the labour vote and while Tabuns has the support of the Toronto Steel Council and Bisson as a northerner who used to work for USWA likely has some northern support (save for several northern USWA locals which have declared for Horwath) the top leadership of the USWA - Leo Gerard (International President), the National President of USWA and Wayne Fraser, USWA's District 6 Director have all declared for Horwath so it's quite likely that Horwath will get the majority of USWA delegates on the first ballot and this will grow as candidates drop off).

However, Steel delegates are not required to follow their leadership (though they will be inclined to - all things being equal) I think the Friday leadership debate/speeches will be key since labour delegates are not voting in advance preferential ballots but will be voting "live" on Saturday. If Horwath bombs or underperforms  and another candidate, particular Tabuns, is very solid then Horwath's base in Steel could soften and splinter. If Steel does coalesce behind Horwath it's very likely since, being the 2nd choice of UFCW (after Bisson) and having SEIU's support and that of a number of local labour councils if Horwath ends up with 3/4 of the labour vote (ie 20% of the overall vote) her rival on the fourth ballot would have to get close to 2/3 of the vote from the rank and file membership to win and that's very difficult to do. 

In the last leaderhsip convention Buzz Hargrove supported Kormos on the first ballot and then went to Lankin and tried to get his delegation to go with him. Most of them refused and stayed with Kormos and then went to Hampton (the animosity between the Lankin and Kormos camps being great) so remember, while labour voters tend to be disciplined, it is a secret ballot and they may not follow their leaders which is why the Friday debate and Saturday arm twisting are key. 

scarboroughnative

From reading these various predictive posts it appears evident that many of you so called insiders have your heads completely up your asses.

My last post to this board and have a nice convention!

foxymoron

scarboroughnative, it's been freakin' cold out there. that's the only place we can stay warm right now!

 the weather's about to turn. by sunday, that 'whoosh' you'll hear will be the sound of a suction seal breaking as several heads emerge from the swampy darkness.

northwestern_lad

aka Mycroft wrote:

The way it's going now Horwath could end up with 2/3 to 3/4 of the labour vote if it goes to a fourth ballot. Steel is 68% of the labour vote and while Tabuns has the support of the Toronto Steel Council and Bisson as a northerner who used to work for USWA likely has some northern support (save for several northern USWA locals which have declared for Horwath

 

Okay, I guess that the meaning of the word several has changed or something because according to Horwath's own website only one Northern USW local has gone with Horwath. One is not several.

Personally I love how the folks here are underestimating Bisson's growth and just assume that he's going to disappear. That's very wishful thinking if you ask me. As I have said before, we'll see what happens this weekend and all questions will be answered. Laughing

Sunday Hat

Which affiliated Steelworker Locals have endorsed Bisson?

northwestern_lad

Sunday Hat wrote:
Which affiliated Steelworker Locals have endorsed Bisson?

You'll find out come convention Wink anyway, but point was that one is not several

G. Babbitt

Did anyone read Bisson's answer on how to get immigrants and racial minorities involved in the party?  It shows an extraordinarily condescending view of newer Canadians and racialized people.  He finds it necessary to qualify that we should be looking for candidates in ridings where there is a significant population of their ethnicity.  I would hope that the ONDP is already doing this, but it shows that there is streak of thinking within the NDP that they should be ghettoized.  It also shows a belief that people from racialized groups do not have other abilities or expertise other than community activism.  

foxymoron

our predictions may diverge on the first ballot outcome, but here i think you're absolutely correct on several counts.

first, the labour delegates (and a signficant # of rank-and-file party members who don't necessarily have any sort of union connection) are definitely going to be keeping an eye on things.

regarding the labour delegates, i think that when especially when you get down to the affiliated locals, union discipline (for lack of a better term) is not solid with respect to any 'official' endorsements.

drill down into any labour delegation and i suspect you'll encounter the same sort of distinct rings...

the national/regional exec

the local exec

the remainder of the delegation, comprised of a mixture of the exec's supporters, hybrid union/ndp activists and respected local members who. to all or some degree, this ring tend to be pretty strong-willed and independent minded when it comes to what they feel is best for their group. few, if any labour delegations will be monolithic. many, if not most delegations will contain a sizable portion of delegates who will go to convention, listen to their leaders, but also to the candidates and to their supporters, see who keeps them most and best fed and watered at hospitality suites, has the best swag and the best debate performance and speech before casting their ballots.

every candidate will have to have game. anyone who bombs one either debate or speech very likely will lose a portion of pledged affiliate votes.

debate will be crucial. this one is going to probably make the nastiest of the party-sanctioned debates (they were pretty timid affairs, really) like a kumbaya-fest. if andrea demonstrates she can't take hits, it might shake her already-shaky support.

the fact hamilton, andrea's back yard, is split pretty much evenly in terms of support between bisson, prue and horwath speaks volumes to me. it leads to the question of how solid her support really is.

all things being equal, if andrea has a middling debate or speech, she loses. she'll need to knock it out of the park to put to rest lingering suspicions that she's not yet ready for prime time.

watch for her spinners to be spinning madly in an effort to lower expectations, because all three other candidates are probably going to be training their fire her way.

 

foxymoron

oh scott, i learned from the masterWink

and hat, noone every said it was a 4-way race, but it certainly is a 3way race.

Scott Piatkowski Scott Piatkowski's picture

foxymoron wrote:

the fact hamilton, andrea's back yard, is split pretty much evenly in terms of support between bisson, prue and horwath speaks volumes to me. it leads to the question of how solid her support really is.

I always love it when a poster pulls something out of thin air (or somewhere else), calls it a "fact" and then uses it to "prove" what they wish was the case.

aka Mycroft

northwestern_lad wrote:

Okay, I guess that the meaning of the word several has changed or something because according to Horwath's own website only one Northern USW local has gone with Horwath. One is not several.

I thought two or three locals in the Sault backed Horwath. My apologies if I'm mistaken.

 

aka Mycroft

Here is the feature interview with Michael Prue

And for those joining us late, here are the links to the other three interviews:

Andrea Horwath

Peter Tabuns

Gilles Bisson

Champion of Nothing1

Quote:

Today, Peggy Nash and Michele Landsberg jointly released a statement endorsing Peter Tabuns for leader of the Ontario NDP.

"When our party chooses a leader, we have to go way deeper than geography or symbolism. We have to search our hearts and consciences and find the one person who best exemplifies our party’s values - the one who can lead with clarity, intelligence and an unshakable commitment to the issues.

Leadership demands vigour and moral courage. Peter Tabuns’ mettle has been tested and has proven itself over and over: Remember when, as a city councillor, he fought to a standstill the privatization of hydro, when he promoted the retrofitting of office buildings long before energy-saving was popular, and when he proposed an "outrageous" smoking ban in restaurants and bars.

We believe that Peter has the experience, the vision and the energy to step into leadership right now to guide us through this frightening recession. Peter fully grasps the social democratic approach to our deepening economic crisis - it’s not pouring money into the pockets of bankers and contractors. It’s about creating and sustaining jobs in both public and private sectors. It’s about shifting our health care focus to the prevention of illness and societal unrest by ending poverty, healing the environment, creating housing for all and confronting the inequality and economic injustice that destabilizes our communities.

He’s the right leader; the one we can proudly back right now."

Peggy Nash and Michele Landsberg

I was having a hard time choosing between two candidates, but now with the endorsement from Peggy Nash I am definitely selecting Peter Tabuns as my first choice.

 

northwestern_lad

aka Mycroft wrote:
northwestern_lad wrote:

Okay, I guess that the meaning of the word several has changed or something because according to Horwath's own website only one Northern USW local has gone with Horwath. One is not several.

I thought two or three locals in the Sault backed Horwath. My apologies if I'm mistaken.

 

Apologies accepted

Sunday Hat

-

Lost in Bruce County

Sunday Hat wrote:

I have to say I don't find it a huge concession on your part to admit that Evelyn Myrie got Horwath's endorsement in 2003. I produced a news article from the time that established that pretty defininitively already.

If you could produce the same sort of documentation concerning Horwath's alleged decision to chase Kelly Hayes out of the race I'd love to see it.

If you can't (and I suspect that may be the case) then I suggest that you might want to stop posting stuff that you can't prove, in addition to your new pledge to stop posting stuff that is completely inaccurate.

Frankly, after the crap you've pulled I don't think people will be inclined to "take your word" on things. Your memory and the facts don't gel very well.

Wow Sunday Hat that was unnecessarily nasty. I don't like being called a liar either. Maybe I've just touched a sour spot in Andrea's history. I have spoken with loads of people from across Hamilton who have said they are not voting for Andrea because they haven't forgiven her for supporting Liberal Bob Bratina. You are right - Kelly Hayes didn't run - she didn't run because Andrea wouldn't support her. Everyone knew that when Andrea left her seat, whoever she supported would be most likely to win. Andrea refused to support Kelly and supported a Liberal instead - shame on her. Call me a liar because the local media didn't cover every minute detail of NDP politics in Hamilton, heck call all those NDPers in Hamilton lisrs too. But I'm going to trust that the people of Hamilton know what they're talking about. 

Michelle

Yeah, how about everyone stop calling everyone liars.  That would be awesome.  Yes, I've received a couple of complaints about this thread, but honestly, as an outsider reading the arguments on both sides, there is no way for me to know from these posts whether the assertions on either side are true or not.  Looks like the usual political wrangling to me. 

If anyone official from any campaign feels like there has been something factually untruthful and defamatory posted here, then please feel free to contact me: michelle AT rabble DOT ca and I will look into it.  Otherwise, tone down the namecalling, okay?

madmax

I observe a 4 way race happening.  I see alot of passion from the posters. I have read slags and BS against Tabuns, Prue and Horwath. And some of this even made it to mainstream media.  My guess is that Bisson doesn't have alot of Northerners who read or pay attention to babble, or there would likely be slags going back and forth there too.

But come on.... those accusations were accompanied with no evidence, and then someone provides sourced evidence to prove the accusations as frivolous and incorrect is clearly demonstrated in these two threads. 

Infact I can tell that Sunday Hat was responding to both the Municipal and Provincial Accusations, and backed them up.

The partisanship of some people here remind me of rabid conservatives like Rush Limbaugh or Anne Coulter who will defend any hearsay, or even fabricate such in order to sway opinion.  Is it politics.... sure.

I am not certain who lost in Bruce supports, but if that is the nature of the campaign she backs.  I wouldn't want that type of organization anywheres near the ONDP.  It reminds me of the hatchet job that the McGuinty Liberals used against... the United Church Minister.  It was an attack campaign that failed miserably and showed a real petty aspect to the Provincial Liberals.

Apparently the Proponents for Ontario NDP leaders are not immune from tossing the feces around. And you stink all the more for it.

What is neat, is that a Leadership campain has taken some life, and you can see that there are groups of people interested in who the next leader of the ONDP is and passionately back there candidates.

It is  good to hear how people decide on whom they are voting for or who catches their attention in Print or Television interviews or in live debates.

I thought the NDP was going nowhere when they launched off on the Separate schools issue, but they have clearly put that to the back burner as far as media presentation goes.  The real issues have come forth on the economy and growing a party back to relevance. 

Another interesting thing I have noted. There seems to be alot of NDPers on Babble from the Bruce Region.  How many people in that Region support the NDP?  They seem so passionate that I wouldn't be surprised that they are all going to the convention?

This thread is way more lively then the John Tory thread.

The same is true on Maple Leaf Web, where the NDP leadership thread & poll which I just recently opened is ready to overtake the John Tory By Election Poll thread.  And not nearly the volume of activity as here.

So, will passions heat up more by the weekend...

I expect so, it makes for fun reading.

 

Zeus

Zeus speaks with authority.  peterjcassidy and Lost in Bruce County do not.

It is time for fact rather than gossip (lies) and innuendo.  It is time to end the slanderous smear campaign against Anrea Horwath.

I was there.  Peter and Lost were not.  Neither can claim to be privvy to the inner workings of the NDP in Hamilton.

Start with the garbage being spewed about the 2003 candidate selection in Hamilton West and the lies that Andrea sought out a white male candidate to run and did not support Evelyn Myrie, a woman of colour.  That Andrea did support the woman of colour has been documented  above by Sunday Hat.  Potential candidates for this nomination were sought and approached be a candidate search committee.  I know this to be fact.  I was on that committee.  I made some of those phone calls.  Andrea Horwath was not on the committee and therefore was not part of the search.

FACTS: Andrea did support Evelyn and did not search for any white male candidate.

Now to move on to the municipal election and the lies about Kelly Hayes' non-candidacy.  Again, I was there, part of the group that coalesced around a progressive candidate ensuring that the neocon was not elected.  Not only does Peter Cassidy not know Kelly Hayes well, his implication that she is some sort of weak meek creature who could not run because of anyone else's support, or lack thereof, is risable.  Also offensive.

Kelly is a very strong independent woman quite capable of thinking and deciding for herself.  To know Kelly is to know that had she wanted to run for a municipal seat, she would have.  To suggest that she wanted this but was thwarted, is either a blatant lie or an example of creative (but inaccurate) writing.

FACTS: Kelly Hayes worked for Bob Brattina's election. Kelly Hayes has actively worked for Andrea in all of her previous campaigns.  This is not the behaviour of a woman rejected by the candidate.  Andrea in no way prevented Kelly from running. 

FACT: Andrea is a strong advocate for women.  To suggest otherwise is to deliberately lie or to display appalling ignorance.

NOW post positive support for the candidate of your choice, but give up the sleazy smear campaign.  Please, use what functioning brain cells you have and keep untrue allegations that might be mined from this site from being quoted against whomever our new leader might be.

foxymoron

with all due respect your...ummm...zeus-ness...perhaps someone should ask all the principals about this.

just a suggestion. please don't pull any of that tying me to a rock or making me roll a rock up a hill or changing into the form of a swan and trying to mate with me or whatever...

 

peterjcassidy peterjcassidy's picture

Zeus, if you were actually "there" " you would know that I was a member of  the Hamilton West executive and that when Dave came to the executive to   discuss the possibility of  him giving up his seat to run for  mayor  I moved the motion supporting him whatever he decided to.do. Would you acknowllege that truth? .

If you were"  there"You would also know that I was actively supporting a candidate to replace Dave when he finally did decide not to run in the general election and that I was a voting member at the nomination meeting to replace him.

If you and the other Andrea Horwath supporters have a modicum of integrity,decency and intelligence  you wo;; withdraw your scurrilious attacks and apologize. They do not do your candidate or our party any good..

 

 

Sunday Hat

How will the Stelco shutdown affect the race? Thoughts?

peterjcassidy peterjcassidy's picture

There will almost certainly be an emergency resolution on the floor talking about the Stelco shutdown. Certaontly its  a major issue for our province and even the country/

aka Mycroft

I remember that prior to past conventions the book of proposed resolutions would be available online. Not so with this convention - not even a detailed agenda of what policy areas are being debated when is on the convention website.

Pages

Topic locked