Tar Sands cancer report not being reported!

12 posts / 0 new
Last post
Noah_Scape
Tar Sands cancer report not being reported!

There was a study in the Canadian Medical Journal, released in August 2009, about the high cancer rates in the natives living near the Tar Sands operations at Ft MacMurray Alberta.

Canadian mainstream media is not reporting this study [or much at all about the plight of the natives living near the Tar Sands]. I only saw the report on Ft. Chip cancer rates because the Gaurdian, from England, had an article on it's website as part of their coverage of a protest in England called "Climate Camp" [also not being reported on in Canadian media]. One of the Climate Camp protestors is George Poitras, a Ft. Chip native, who is at Climate Camp to bring attention to this aspect of the Tar Sands operations.

I copied the Gaurdian article below.

The CMAJ study link is below that, and some other links.

 

 

-----------Gaurdian article by George Poitras, a former Chief from the Ft Chip area:

UK companies are extracting oil from our traditional lands.

We believe it's killing us - and that's why I'm attending Climate Camp

My people are dying, and we believe British companies are responsible. My community, Fort Chipewyan in Alberta, Canada, is situated at the heart of the vast toxic moonscape that is the tar sands development. We live in a beautiful area, but unfortunately, we find ourselves upstream from the largest fossil fuel development on earth. UK oil companies like BP, and banks like RBS, are extracting the dirtiest form of oil from our traditional lands, and we fear it is killing us.

We have come to call the tar sands "bloody oil". This is why, this week, I am coming to London to attend the Camp for Climate Action, with the aim of internationalising the campaign for a complete tar sands moratorium.

We believe the extraction of oil from Canada's tar sands is having a devastating impact on our indigenous people. This year, a study confirms that there are elevated levels of rare and other cancers among indigenous residents who live directly downstream from the tar sands activity, and that the contamination of our waters, snow, vegetation, wildlife and fish has grown exponentially in the past five years.

This evidence, however, is never acknowledged by the Albertan or Canadian governments, or the oil companies investing in the tar sands, when they promote it globally as being "environmentally sustainable".

People deserve to know the life and death impacts of the tar sands, especially residents of the UK, because your oil companies and banks are some of the biggest players.

In 2006, our community's physician informed the responsible authorities that he was diagnosing disproportionate levels of unusual cancers. Rather than come to his aid, the provincial and federal health authorities charged him with "causing undue alarm" to our people; a charge that remains outstanding. Furthermore, we have proven that the levels of metals like mercury, arsenic and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in our waters and sediment are abnormally high. Combined, these metals are known carcinogens that cause the type of rare cancers found in our community. But the government and oil companies continue to dismiss these claims, despite the rigorous scientific methods employed.

When the cancer study was released in February 2009, it did two things for residents of my community. First, it vindicated us. It proved our fears that we were burying our loved ones all too frequently were valid. Second, it created further anxiety in us because we believed that any one of us living in our community was now much more susceptible to becoming afflicted with cancer in the future.

Despite western scientists proving that there are elevated levels of metals in the water and sediment, vegetation, fish and snow; that the air quality in the region is worse than other geographic regions in Canada; and that the acid rain disposition is greater than other locales; the Alberta and Canadian governments continue to deny any of this evidence.

So, since 2006, our lives have been consumed with making governments and oil companies responsible and accountable in their quest to exploit the resources from our traditional homelands, a challenge that is often characterised as a "David & Goliath" situation.

Our community has called for a moratorium on any further approvals of these multibillion-dollar mega-projects. We have had support from doctors, former politicians, indigenous councils, and entire provinces for the moratorium. But we have never been heeded.

Alberta's tar sands are now the subject of three legal actions by indigenous governments against the government of Alberta for not consulting with its indigenous communities before going ahead with this development, which has been called "the most destructive project on earth".

We realise that the development of Alberta's tar sands is no longer just an issue central to those of us living in its direct path. Rather, it has become a global challenge. The greenhouse gases emitted are contributing to climate change globally - extracting oil from these sludgy deposits produces three to five times as much CO2 as conventional oil. The Alberta and Canadian governments unsparingly spend millions of dollars to promote investment in the tar sands worldwide. Foreign oil companies, including BP and Shell, are now much bigger beneficiaries from the exploitation of our resources than we are.

But what is most disturbing is the fear that any oil company or financial institution that invests in Alberta's tar sands is contributing to the early demise of my people. To date, governments, banks and oil companies continue to deny this.

So we are grateful to our friends from the Indigenous Environmental Network and the Camp for Climate Action, who have joined together to support us. At the camp, we will share our struggle with activists from the UK. We hope that whichever UK residents we reach can assist us by persuading your government, national oil companies and banking institutions to reconsider their investment in Alberta's bloody oil.

 

----------Links:

Gaurdian article:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/aug/24/climate-camp-canada-...

Climate Camp home page:

http://climatecamp.org.uk/

 

CMAJ - here is the original study!!

http://www.ecmaj.com/cgi/rapidpdf/cmaj.090248v1.pdf

Noah_Scape

Here is a related snippet about the Ft. Chip cancer rates:

 

High Cancer Rates Among Fort Chipewyan Residents

     Two doctors who raised concerns about cancer risks for residents of Fort Chipewyan living near Alberta’s oil sands say they feel vindicated by a new report confirming elevated cancer rates in the community.

     An Alberta Health Services study, released Feb. 6, found 51 cancers in 47 people between 1995 and 2006, instead of the 39 incidents of cancer that would have been expected statistically. There were higher incidents of biliary tract cancers (3 cases: 2 of cholangiocarcinoma and 1 of adenocarcinoma of Ampulla of Vater), cancers of the blood and lymphatic system (8 cases — more than double what was expected), and 2 cases of soft tissue cancers, according to the study, which Dr. Yiqun Chen conducted for the province.

Sarann

Check the Slave River Journal issues of March 31, June 9, June 16.  They are on line.  Brian Jean is not protecting his constituents,  Bernard Bigras is defending them.  Ironic, isn't it?

Fidel

[url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/aboriginals/health.html]Chemical valley[/url]

Aamjiwnaang First Nation in Sarnia sounds alarm over toxins

 

[url=http://www.pollutionissues.com/Br-Co/Cancer-Alley-Louisiana.html]Cancer Alley, Louisiana[/url]

 

[url=http://archive.wri.org/news.cfm?id=83]Millions of children in the world's largest cities are exposed to life-threatening air pollution[/url]

 

Highlights of the EHI, and the overall report analysis, include:

 

Quote:
* Smaller cities and those in developed countries in general, are not exempt from the threats of air pollution. For example, smaller cities in China, such as Lanzhou, which lies at the heart of a major petrochemical industry and oil-refining center, have the highest concentrations of particulate matter in the world

 

Kapitalist profits before people, and especially people of colour and living things in general always.

Noah_Scape

I didn't bother to register at the Slave Lake Journal site, so I could not see those articles [but thanks for that Sarann]; some local reporting is helpfull, but to stop expansion and reign in the ongoing damage there needs to be wider coverage, and outrage.

Canadians, Albertans especially, are not being given all the facts about the damage of the Tar Sands.

Climate change is not the only issue there of course. The immediate human toll is horrendous; our political leaders are misleading us.

Noah_Scape

I didn't bother to register at the Slave Lake Journal site, so I could not see those articles [but thanks for that Sarann]; some local reporting is helpfull, but to stop expansion and reign in the ongoing damage there needs to be wider coverage, and outrage.

Canadians, Albertans especially, are not being given all the facts about the damage of the Tar Sands.

Climate change is not the only issue there of course. The immediate human toll is horrendous; our political leaders are misleading us.

Sarann

It's The Slave River Journal out of Fort Smith, NWT and I don't think you have to register.

remind remind's picture

here is the link

http://www.srj.ca/

Sarann

Thank you remind.  Must learn how to do that.

remind remind's picture

YW

thorin_bane

Apparently the tar sand are having an effect on SW ontario as we process the bitumen. Though it could also be american pollution that is giving us higher cancer rates than other areas as well.

toni0

Canada's national newspapers are covering the latest developments on this issue, including findings by Alberta's College of Physicians and Surgeons on Dr. O'Connor's work in Fort Chip.
 
The National Post
http://bit.ly/q0uOa
http://bit.ly/42yyu1
http://bit.ly/30DFwo
The Globe and Mail
http://bit.ly/3jtZws