For those who haven't seen it yet, here's the Popular Mechanics article of March 2005. Five years on, it's still a salient read:
... http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
Thanks Sineed. I think PM is a good magazine for reviewing consumer products, like ATVs, electronics and other stuff, and published by Hearst family enterprises no less.
But I don't think it's the proper medium for airing the crazy George government's dirty laundry concerning what was neglected in the official government conspiracy theory for 9/11.
http://cheezburger.com/TemplateView.aspx?ciid=6465899
"Okay all you ex-hippie liberals. The 9-11 strikes were masterminded by a 93 year old lady who was tired of the twin towers blocking her view of Jersey. "
I agree totally with this blanket statement of protest. The bipartisan war parties are not looking good on 9/11 according to their own bipartisan 9/11 commission panelists. America really is divided when it comes to 9/11.