Poulnatic2, so it is okay to attack someone, who is not causing the problems, as long as you agree with the motives or issues that are also being raised. That sure seems to be what you, Mycroft, Mike and Jason from the other thread seem to be saying by attacking the person asked to count the votes, instead of the person in charge of the process.
And if you bothered to check, like I just did, BA reached out to Stuart Parker and was respectfully thanked by Parker by the way- something I could not be accused of and was critical of Cheri Dinovo, if not the NDP or comfortable with the term aparthied, which is hardly universally accepted by a lot of people who might agree completely about Isreal's actions being terrible. Yet you could not resist taking a swipe- which again begs the question how is that helpful or useful.
It's funny. I can be objective as I am not even an NDP member. I see one person saying, hold on, you are going too far in attacking those carrying out the duties assigned them (workers), when your real quarrel is with management (the president). And then I see furious backpedaling trying to rationalize that action instead of saying whoops sorry, that's not what we mean, sorry about that, thanks for pointing that out. Now maybe those raising those concerns could have been nicer, but jumping crickets that seems to be the whole reason some want to post so I can see where people might be a bit suspicious and sensitive about that.