Dogma. Would that phrase be okay if I applied it to a poster who was spouting Randian ideals on babble? I'm pretty certain it would be, and I'd be just as likely to. Again, no reference to left or right, simply that NS had a position and would not listen to the other side of the argument - instead, imputing a lot of crap to me that I never said. Consequently, they were not at all in the same tenor as what NS said.
You are incapable of doing any wrong and all others in a debate are wrong by definition. Did I get your meaning clearly enough? Below is the post you first responded too that I posted before the walk was held.
Explain will you where I did anything but suggest places other than the ones in the Star article and also suggest that other people need to attend this walk. As you point out it was designed to attract more people and be somewhat fluid and going with the flow of the people who show up. You obviously didn't like my tone but frankly my words were neither dogmatic nor implied some sort of pecking order. The post does show that I too was duped by the MSM.
I may have implied you were a capitalist tool and I apologize for my retaliatory comments. I note that you also totally ignored my attempt at reconciliation with the organizers and chose to blame me for developing a flame war. I responded to their arrogance and you jumped in on their side. I actually have fairly nuanced views on most issues try reading all my posts in a thread and getting a sense of their meaning from their totality not on a pick and chose basis.
"Pecking orders and purity tests. Very socialist of you all. " That is classic red baiting just so you know for future reference.
Catchfire wrote:
I'm actually interested in you telling us what actually happened on the walk. What do you say?
Indeed. So am I.