I don't agree with the notion of banning guns used and made primarilly for hunting. People in urban cities go hunting all the time. Theres no point in banning something when it can be reasonably restricted.
I agree. That's why all I proposed was ending individual ownership. Guns should be readily available to urban or rural folks for hunting. They should not be owned, stored, bought, or sold.
Anyways... the main issue with this was the punishment, which was not needed. A wag of the finger perhaps, but we need them out on the front benches fighting while many of our stars are in a leadership contest.
Svend Robinson was punished (and he didn't even go against a whipped vote). Bill Siksay was punished for voting against Harper's omnibus crime bill. These latest dudes knew the jurisprudence. They did the crime, they do the time. Otherwise, pro-gun constituents will ask other MPs: "There's no consequence for ignoring the whip and voting your conscience, so what's your problem?"