See Peter3, we had a civilized exchange (you and I) early in the thread. I agreed with you and adopted your characterization about Jack's role in squaring the circle last time. Then, you simply [url=http://rabble.ca/babble/canadian-politics/ndp-mps-disciplined-long-gun-r... out[/url], stopped entirely talking about the subject matter here, and got personal. You questioned my right to comment on how mavericks in the caucus should be treated. You talked about me, not the issue. I'm inviting you to return to your [url=http://rabble.ca/babble/canadian-politics/ndp-mps-disciplined-long-gun-r... style of contribution[/url], which is valuable - as opposed to your current voluble and volatile one. You can call me "passive aggressive" if you like, but that doesn't justify aggression.