9/11 Reports 2
The United States has formally sent to trial Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, alleged Pakistani mastermind of 9/11 terror attacks, along with four other suspected al Qaeda militants involved in its planning.
They could face the death penalty if found guilty. The five Guantanamo Bay inmates will be tried by a military commission on charges including terrorism, hijacking, conspiracy, murder and destruction of property, the Pentagon said Wednesday.
"If found guilty"? lol! Well sure the inquisition will find them guilty. It's a forgone conclusion. What other verdict would a kangaroo court produce?
911 The Terrorism Trump Card - by Brian Burchill
"The time is long overdue for investigative journalists to challenge such references to unsubstantiated terrorism. They can do so with confidence by becoming knowledgeable about the growing body of evidence refuting the official claims about the growing body of evidence refuting the official claims about the events of 9/11.."
In a January 18th interview, Prime Minister Stephen Harper told Mansbridge that he thinks that "the evidence is...overwhelming" and that it "is just beyond dispute at this point" that Iran's purpose is to develop nuclear weapons. When pressed about Iran's insistence that it has no intention to build nuclear weapons, Harper said "I think there is absolutely no doubt they are lying".2
Harper's claims are all-too-reminiscent of US Former Secretary of State Colin Powell's February, 2003, statement at the UN that, with "facts and conclusions based on solid intelligence",3 there was no doubt in his mind that Saddam Hussein was working to obtain key components to produce nuclear weapons.
Harper is a vicious, vicious toadie. Intelligence? Like yellowcake, aluminum tubes and biological WMD that Iraq was supposed to have?
Our snivelleing, grovelling obedient lapdog in phony-majority government will say anything for a pat on the head and a good boy biscuit.
Harper is an embarrassing embarrassment to all Canadians. It's shameful. Harper is a national disgrace.
Debate on '9/11, False Flags and Black Ops' with Jonathan Kay and Webster Tarpley (and vid)
"with David Frum, Jonathan Kay and Webster Tarpley. This debate is especially relevent coming as it does as the little Ribbentrops of the NATO foreign ministeries escalate their campaign for a near-term attack on Syria and/or Iran.."
Author Jonathan Kay is an embarrassment to the very idea of investigative news journalism. He posits that because General Smedley Butler was able to blow the whistle on a fascist conspiracy to overthrow the FDR government in the 1930's due to independent news media operating freely in America, the same news media is present to accommodate whistleblowers today.
Watergate was leaked by the media, so therefore any 9/11 government conspiracy would necessarily also be leaked to and by the news media.
But Kay makes no mention of the increase in concentration of news media in the hands of a few in the 30 or so years between Watergate and 9/11. He neglected to mention that thousands of news media corporations in America would eventually be owned by five largest corporate owners by the 1990s. Just five. Wouldn't it be easier to control the news and therefore what Americans are thinking with such high concentration of ownership of the news media?
In fact Jon Kay neglects to mention that Adam Smith and Karl Marx were among the first to point out the fact that capitalists conspire to rig markets in their favour. Monopoly capitalism is a real conspiracy. The goal for every capitalist is to eliminate the competition. One former visiting Soviet dignitary asked his American hosts how US news media could be forced to all report nearly exactly the same news stories as if on queue. The Soviet dignitary said that it was remarkable because in the USSR the state had to threaten their news journalists to achieve similar results.
CIA: We can't release the photos because they are fakes, and truthers would only point out that the photos were photoshop'd, like all of the forged photos and fake film footage of Elvis bin Laden before.
[url=http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=30654]WHO WAS OSAMA? WHO IS OBAMA?[/url]
In Libya and Syria, Al Qaeda brigades are the foot soldiers of the US-NATO military alliance. Wherever the US military and intelligence apparatus is deployed, Al Qaeda is present:
Al Qaeda in Iraq, Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), the Libya Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), Al Shaabab (Somalia), Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, Jaish-e-Mohammed (JEM) (Army of Mohammed) (Pakistan), Jemaah Islamiya organization (JI) (Indonesia) Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, etc. (See US State Department Foreign Terrorist Organizations, United Nations Security Council, List of individuals, groups, undertakings and other entities associated with Al-Qaida Al-Qaida Sanctions List)
In a bitter irony, in all these countries, US intelligence is covertly coordinating the activities of Al Qaeda affiliated groups. Officially counterterrorism consists in fighting the "Islamic jihad" Unofficially through covert operations, Western intelligence supports their "assets" including terror entities on the US State Department list.
Moreover, these various terrorist organizations are now being used in US-NATO covert military operations against sovereign countries (e.g. Libya and Syria). According to Israeli intelligence sources:
"NATO headquarters in Brussels and the Turkish high command are meanwhile drawing up plans for their first military step in Syria, which is to arm the rebels with weapons for combating the tanks and helicopters spearheading the Assad regime's crackdown on dissent. Instead of repeating the Libyan model of air strikes, NATO strategists are thinking more in terms of pouring large quantities of anti-tank and anti-air rockets, mortars and heavy machine guns into the protest centers for beating back the government armored forces."(DEBKAfile, NATO to give rebels anti-tank weapons, August 14, 2011)
Obama vs Romney with Al-CIA'duh running the fear factor.
We were initially led to believe that Obama and other members of his administration personally watched bin Laden's killing. White House "situation room" photos featured an apparently shocked Hillary Clinton seemingly watching events live - even though it was subsequently admitted by CIA director Leon Panetta that there had been no live feed during the raid. Several other significant revisions were made to the original account of the raid...
The legend of Elvis bin Laden lives on.
On May 8, The New York Times headlined "Rare Double Agent Disrupted Bombing Plot, US says."
Most likely it's double-dealing official lies and misreporting. According to Times-speak, a Saudi intelligence agent "infiltrated (a) terrorist group and volunteered for the mission, American and foreign officials said Tuesday."
Washington claims he provided an "innovative bomb" designed for "aviation attack." The Times reported the story without checking for reliability. If official sources say it, accounts follow true or false.
The agent is back in Saudi Arabia, The Times said. CIA agents were involved.
What's true or false isn't clear. What's certain is another false flag for reasons similar to previous ones. They repeat well-timed for strategic advantage.
They're manufactured to look real. Media scoundrels headline them. Most people don't know they've been had. The scam repeats because it works. No wonder America gets away with murder and much more.
We are at War
against International Terrorism,
defending our Values
and our Civilization.