In post #338, you make the implication here (italics mine):
The mother states she was told by the doctors, the same doctors you rely on for your quotes and expertise, that her daughter would be dead right now if she halted chemotherapy, she halted chemotherapy, employed diet and other modalities, and not only is her daughter alive but apparently cancer free.I'm not sure how else I'm supposed to understand the above other than a promotion of the vegan diet and a denial of the value of chemotherapy.
I stand by my opinion that such implications are not only ill-considered but irresponsible.
I said she employed diet and other modalities, I said nothing about a vegan diet. Do you understand that you lied about what I said and then accused me of being irresponsible for saying something that you made up.