GOP scumbag gutter presidential nominee may lead to clean sweep for the Democrats

I think that this isn't the end of his skeletons in his closet. I personally know of much worse that hasn't been addressed yet. It was in the media before but it hasn't come up yet. It's been hush hush so far.

I just looked it up and apparently Obama could be appointed to the Supreme Court. In fact, former President Taft was appointed by Harding eight years after he left the White House and served as a Supreme Court Justice for eight years from 1921-1930. Hillary was once asked about her thoughts of appointing Obama if she won the election, and the media also asked Obama what his thoughts were about going to the Supreme Court after he left office. So, I guess he could do it if he was appointed to go.

NP: I am no expert, but my interpretation of what Wang said is that the election polls in the United States are not volatile, so an event like this latest scandal is not going to shift committed Republican voters away from the GOP. There might be a short term ripple in the polls, but his committed support base are hunkered in at this point behind Trump.

If Orange Hitler is defeated,what becomes of his brand? It's forever tainted. His Hollywood buddies? All gone,save Gary Busey,Meat Loaf and Antonio Sabato Jr?

What we're watching is not just a buffoon's campaign spiralling to its death but the brand,Trump,the name used to sell everything from steaks to douche bags.

He's left with only his groupies. Much of them with very few years left on this planet.

When he comes back to his regular life,he's going to find that the only thing he had going for himself,the brand,his name will forever be synonymous with everything vile,despicable and repulsive. His brand is forever irreparably damaged.

There's his just dessert.

Donald Trump Accused of Raping a Thirteen Year Old Girl! Media Cover-Up!

Huffington Post Article includes:

1.  A list of previous court cases against Trump for sexual assault and rape.

2. One previous court case sounds eerily similar to the taped recording on Friday of Trump bragging about forcing himself on a woman, groping her, and getting away with it because he is famous.

3. Trump has alleged links to Jeffry Epstein, a very high profile Level 3 convicted and registered sex offender.

Why The New Child Rape Case Filed Against Donald Trump Should Not Be Ignored - Huffington Post

NorthReport wrote:

Thanks misfit It's important to spend a bit of time on the background of someone who might have become President before rushing full bore into attacking the President-elect as there will be plenty of time for that I have concerns about a bunch of the usual white males jumping in and attacking the first woman President of the United States even before she has taken office

Unfortunately I cannot fully conform to your stereotype as I am only male, but not white. Nonetheless, if they offend you, please disregard my misogynistic comments towards our saintly first female POTUS as merely mindless attacks of one who objects to the woman candidate not due to any legitimate grievances (because of course there are none) but simply because she is a woman. /s

My only attack on the first woman POTUS in this context is that those in glass houses should not throw stones. If only Bernie Sanders won, I wouldn't be forced to lament that both candidates have close ties to Jeffrey Epstein.

Seriously, how sick is it that when you hear that a generally objectionable candidate is buddies with a convicted pedophile, you can't use it as an effective bludgeon on that candidate because the other candidate is also friends with that same pedophile.

I wonder who the American people will choose. Orange pedo-Hitler 2.0, or the first woman POTUS who is (of course!!) above legitimate reproach. Tsk. Decisions, decisions... /s

Cody87 wrote:

My only attack on the first woman POTUS in this context is that those in glass houses should not throw stones. If only Bernie Sanders won, I wouldn't be forced to lament that both candidates have close ties to Jeffrey Epstein.

Seriously, how sick is it that when you hear that a generally objectionable candidate is buddies with a convicted pedophile, you can't use it as an effective bludgeon on that candidate because the other candidate is also friends with that same pedophile.

I did not know that Bill Clinton is running

bekayne wrote:

Cody87 wrote:

My only attack on the first woman POTUS in this context is that those in glass houses should not throw stones. If only Bernie Sanders won, I wouldn't be forced to lament that both candidates have close ties to Jeffrey Epstein.

Seriously, how sick is it that when you hear that a generally objectionable candidate is buddies with a convicted pedophile, you can't use it as an effective bludgeon on that candidate because the other candidate is also friends with that same pedophile.

I did not know that Bill Clinton is running

I suppose that if people are judged by the company they keep - and they are - then being married to Bill Clinton for decades is pretty relevant in this context.

It takes a real feminist icon to stand by a man like Bill Clinton.

NorthReport wrote:

Cody87

 

Let me break it to you gently. Trump is going to be severely trounced. When the votes are counted in the Electoral College people may wonder if there even was a GOP candidate. 

I don't give two figs who wins in November. Both candidates are horrible. My objection is to you suggesting that attacks against Clinton - an objectively terrible candidate - made in this space are invalid because they are gender-based. This is not to say there are no attacks against Clinton that are gender-based, and of course gender-based attacks are invalid. But here on rabble.ca there are no gender-based attacks on Hillary Clinton.

If you see me "defend" Trump or "attack" Clinton, that is only because I generally only speak up when I see something I disagree with. Since I have seen no invalid criticisms of Clinton in this space, nor invalid defenses of Trump, you don't see me take contrary positions.

When I participate in more balanced forums, I criticize and/or defend both candidates where they are being treated unfairly (either positively or negatively).

If there was someone active in this space who was spewing out Trump propaganda with the mindless devotion and fervor that you spew every bit of partisan nonsense you find, then you would see me criticizing Trump at least as much as I criticize Clinton.