Look Magoo, I know you sometimes have this rhetorical thing where you ask a pointed question you insist on an answer for, but I think perhaps you have mistaken me for your trained barking seal.
Your question is absurd, as it is completely speculative.
It is pointness, since they do not have that power, so the question has no purpose except to someone who is fishing for an anwer to string off into another tangent.
So excuse me if I do not bite .
And the law isn't vague; it is pretty straightforward to extend protection in the Human Rights Act and criminal code to include transgendered people. It is a good idea that is a long time in coming.
Will it have to be balanced out against other rights?
Of course, but frankly, some tenured professor worried about its impact on his right to snub people, and spinning it as a left wing agenda isn't high on that list. His spin on it, and the false notion it wil force him to say anything at all IS a conspiracy.