This will be updated from time to time - please post your votes or comments in other Rabble Reactions threads, which I will monitor. Thanks!
[center][b][u][size=20]RESOLUTION[/size][/u][/b][/center]
[i]Be it resolved that we implement the following policy:[/i]
[b]1. No personal attacks, whatsoever (understanding that obviously there may be grey areas).[/b]
[b]2. No bans or suspensions (except obvious trolls/spammers).[/b]
[b]3. Mods intervene to lay down the law, gently or firmly as required.[/b]
[b]4. Revisit and reconsider these rules in three (3) months.[/b]
[b][u]IN FAVOUR[/u][/b]:
- G. Pie
- martin dufresne
- Bookish Agrarian (I believe - please confirm)
- Tommy_Paine
- Unionist
- remind
- Stargazer
- Fidel
- janfromthebruce (subject to defining a proper quorum)
- Sineed
- CMOT Dibbler
- Frmrsldr
- Frustrated Mess (but: no more introspective babble threads)
- George Victor
- Prophit
[b][u]OPPOSED:[/u][/b]
- jrootham
- genstrike
- Caissa
- mahmud
- Boom Boom
[b][u]ABSTAIN:[/u][/b]
- Farmpunk
- Lard Tunderin' Jeezus
- Timebandit
- bagkitty
- HeywoodFloyd
- Bubbles
- M. Spector
[b][u]Have commented but awaiting clarification:[/u][/b]
- Infosaturated
- George Victor
- Wilf Day (would vote "yes" if amended to read "no bans" only, but allowing suspensions)
- Pogo (yes, if amnesty for banned babblers upon appeal by 10 babblers, otherwise abstain)
- al-Qa'bong (waiting for mountains to turn blue - await clarification, as some mountains already shimmer blue in their luxuriant robes woven of morning mist)
- Slumberjack (can't interpret his post today)
- Erik Redburn (kinda yes, sorta no, depending on coupla amendments)
- N.Beltov (basically agrees with jrootham and Wilf Day - but didn't vote yet)