Thank you for taking the time to answer for me, setting the stage, so to speak, and misrepresenting my position. Your question is in queue and will be answered as time allows.
You want to destroy my environment so frankly I don't care much for your viewpoint. It is a nuanced one just as the oil industry talking points have become more nuanced. You say you believe in science answers and when I ask you repeatedly about the biggest scientific question and you refuse to answer. Oh well you have largely been neutralized as a voice since people have been drawing out your real opinions. You and NR can continue on talking to each other in oilspeak.
You want to destroy my country while giving the rest of the world a free pass so frankly I don't care much for your failed communist pretensions. But thank you for having "fun" with insincere 'questions' you had no intention of taking seriously. Only a closed minded ideologist will assume that simplistic solutions can solve complex issues. I am very much in favour of continued science and especially more opportunities for education in the STEM disciplines to put more resources into the solutions to global concerns and view the grievance-mongering of the usual assortment of ideologists as counter productive although the protests of activists is helpful in bringing attention to the issue.