Pipeline champion Rachel Notley casts herself as Alberta’s Iron Lady
Just as only Richard Nixon could go to China, only Rachel Notley could fight for a pipeline this fiercely.
http://edmontonjournal.com/opinion/columnists/paula-simons-pipeline-cham...
Already being discussed at great length in this thread. There is really no need to duplicate and confuse the conversation.
This is fantastic - look at all the free publicity the NDP is getting. The NDP never had it so good! Go Rachel! Go John!
Here is how Rachel Notley could really take the boots to B.C.
Close the highways? Arrest everyone with a B.C. license plate? This fight is already unconstitutional, so why not?
http://nationalpost.com/news/ban-the-vancouver-canucks-here-is-how-ridic...
B.C. Issues Formal Challenge Against Alberta's Wine Ban
Trade Minister Bruce Ralston says the ban is inconsistent with Alberta's obligations under Canada's free trade agreement.
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2018/02/19/bc-alberta-wine-ban-challenge_a_...
What does Rachel say about this?
Oil Companies Should Pay For Climate Change Costs, Says Environmental Group
Auditor general’s report warns BC not meeting emissions targets or prepared for consequences.
https://thetyee.ca/News/2018/02/20/Oil-Companies-Should-Pay-For-Climate-...
B.C. Wine Institute challenges Alberta's constitutional authority to ban out-of-province wines
https://www.straight.com/food/1035531/bc-wine-institute-challenges-alber...
The NDP couldn't buy this publicity, seriously!
Ads and an injunction: Alberta-B.C. pipeline war continues
http://vancouversun.com/news/politics/ads-and-an-injunction-alberta-bc-p...
Alberta touts ‘shared goals’ on climate change
http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/canada/edmonton/alberta-touts-shared-goals-b-c-newspaper-ads-1.4545555
I've reported this duplicate thread and asked it be closed. There is no reason to stop a conversation and re-start the same one somewhere else. Especially when the main point is to link to articles with little or no surrounding discussion. Babble isn't a news aggregation service. Please use the existing thread for this conversation. Yeah, I'm not a mod, but I can express my opinion, and mods need assistance too.
Already being discussed at great length in this thread. There is really no need to duplicate and confuse the conversation.
NR I have to agree with Unionist. Multiple threads on exactly the same topic makes it difficult to follow conversations. I really value many of the links you post so I don't have a problem with that.
Both threads are about Rachel Notley promoting the pipeline. The titles both reflect that. What is supposed to be different about this thread?
Closing.
