Well said. And all this "if he doesn't like it, he should sue" is very offensive. It's not how allies and supporters of the same cause deal with each other.
Neither is harrassment, and I believe the allegations.
Erin Weir also believes the allegations (including the exaggerated one by the staffer who was trying to shut him down and then sparked the final crisis by going public). He said he realized from reading them what he was doing wrong (although he stopped whenever told), and was going to change. And as for the staffer, he provided the context, once she had gone public. So I believe the allegations also. But I don't for a moment believe the findings of "sexual harassment". I know the definition, and I cited it here back in February, when Singh said that an initial review didn't indicate that there was any harassment of a sexual nature.
What is your point? He wasn't expelled from caucus because of the harassment allegations.