Hi MM
Ok I'm going to pick up on your summary here:
What we see is that all the actions in the indictment were done by a single group. That group was sophisticated enough that it was almost certainly a state actor. The GRU is named, as are specific individuals in that organization. This seems to be based on having compromised the computers used by at least some of these individuals.
Unless the whole indictment is a fabric of lies, which I consider quite unlikely, there are logs and other records which can back up all the allegations, due to the very nature of these allegations. These can't just be guesses, they must be either lies or facts. I consider it overwhelmingly likely that they are facts, but that's just my opinion.
So this all boils down to if this is all lies or not. Am I right? Can a US government body be capable of fabricating this whole entire thing up?
You either have a short memory span or or you are not aware of this story or you believed it all along.
https://theintercept.com/2018/02/06/lie-after-lie-what-colin-powell-knew...
In my opinion, Russiagate is not what it appears. People were charged in this case in full knowledge that they will NEVER appear before an impartial trial to shed light on this. If those charged were to appear, they would have the opportunity to forward evidence that could embarrass the US! I myself personally will never say someone/group is guilty of anything unless that person had the opportunity to give their version of events and was allowed to present evidence.
I will never sacrifice my standards! Why the fuck would I ever lower my standards for the US government?!?!?!?!