babble-intro-img
babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.

17-year old youth dead after being stunned by Police Taser

N.Beltov
Offline
Joined: May 25 2003
 

Comments

N.Beltov
Offline
Joined: May 25 2003
quote:CBC: A man is dead after being shot with a Taser stun gun by police in Winnipeg early Tuesday afternoon.

Police have released few details about the incident.

Man dead after Police Taser him.

ETA: I've changed the thread title from "man dead" to "youth dead" after discovering the victim's age.

[ 25 July 2008: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]


Michelle
Offline
Joined: May 10 2001
There seriously needs to be a moratorium on tasers. Cops are clearly using them willy-nilly and they're killing people with them. They think that if it's not a gun, they can just use them whenever they want with impunity. It's ridiculous.

N.Beltov
Offline
Joined: May 25 2003
We don't really know all the relevant information right now; perhaps he was shot by police after he was tasered. Anything is possible, given the scarcity of information so far.

Gah. That was clumsily expressed. What I mean is let's see if the police give some alternate explanation as a cause of death, how long they take to come up with said explanation, and whether they shift into lockdown mode while getting their stories straight.

[ 22 July 2008: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]


N.Beltov
Offline
Joined: May 25 2003
Bump.
quote:CBC: The latest Winnipeg case is believed to be the 22nd fatality (in Canada) following the use of a Taser since 2003.

Taser-related death


Sean in Ottawa
Offline
Joined: Jun 3 2003
On my screen I saw first the headline truncated:
"Man dead after being stunned" and I wondered when the Liberals were going to hold their convention and if I should express condolences to Dion's family. Then of course I saw that this was about tasers.

al-Qa'bong
Offline
Joined: Feb 27 2003
Part of the ABC warfare portion of basic training in the Canadian Forces used to be having to go through a building that was filled with tear gas. The intent of this excercise was in part to teach respect for chemical weapons.

I suggest that recruits in Canadian police departments be tasered to teach them a similar respect.


RosaL
Offline
Joined: Mar 4 2007
Interestingly, the Winnipeg man was outside some kind of microbiology facility.

Bacchus
Offline
Joined: Dec 8 2003
Ah yes I remember going through that that test Al-Q. You have to stay in a small room and when they tell you to, you close your eyes, take off the mask,open your eyes, say your name and then you can run out.

Many never said their name or made it out

And many police departments have that 'testing' as part of their training, I know that Toronto and Peel does now


M. Spector
Offline
Joined: Feb 19 2005
quote:Originally posted by al-Qa'bong:
I suggest that recruits in Canadian police departments be tasered to teach them a similar respect.
You really think that imposing some sort of macho rite of passage would have a salutary effect on police conduct?

Quite the contrary, in my opinion.

"Hey, I took a taser in basic training. We all did. It's no big deal." Or "It's so safe, we even taser each other at cop school."


It's Me D
Offline
Joined: Apr 22 2008
quote: Ah yes I remember going through that that test Al-Q. You have to stay in a small room and when they tell you to, you close your eyes, take off the mask,open your eyes, say your name and then you can run out.

Many never said their name or made it out

And many police departments have that 'testing' as part of their training, I know that Toronto and Peel does

And, thanks to those same police, this is also required "testing" for Canadian activists [img]tongue.gif" border="0[/img]


Bacchus
Offline
Joined: Dec 8 2003
quote: "Hey, I took a taser in basic training. We all did. It's no big deal." Or "It's so safe, we even taser each other at cop school."

Pretty much the attitude of any toronto cop Ive talked to about it. (oddly enough i get to alk to a lot of cops )


Unionist
Online
Joined: Dec 11 2005
quote:Originally posted by RosaL:
Interestingly, the Winnipeg man was outside some kind of microbiology facility.

Don't know where your information comes from.

The Winnipeg "man" was a 17-year-old Metis kid.


N.Beltov
Offline
Joined: May 25 2003
Yes, the police are starting to release information about the incident.

quote:Globe and Mail: Winnipeg police say a 17-year-old male who died after being hit with a taser stun gun was brandishing a knife when he was confronted.... The teen was taken to hospital in critical condition and later pronounced dead. The cause of death has yet to be determined pending an autopsy.

The WPS had a press conference today where these details were released. There is, however, nothing in the Globe report about HOW many times the youngster was zapped with the taser, which puts out 50,000 volts per usage.

Cops: knife - - - > taser - - - > death.


N.Beltov
Offline
Joined: May 25 2003
Taser-related deaths in Canada. They're really starting to add up. I think that makes 22.

quote:RosaL: Interestingly, the Winnipeg man was outside some kind of microbiology facility.

There's a huge parking area behind and to the west of the Health Sciences Centre in Winnipeg, that goes all the way to the Health Canada Microbiology Lab. That's what's relevant about the location, I think, if the police claims of car robbery/theft are to be believed.


Aristotleded24
Offline
Joined: May 24 2005
quote:Originally posted by Michelle:
There seriously needs to be a moratorium on tasers. Cops are clearly using them willy-nilly and they're killing people with them. They think that if it's not a gun, they can just use them whenever they want with impunity. It's ridiculous.

The problem isn't the tasers, the problem is the officers using them. It boils down to the officer's training, judgment, and mechanisms to hold them accountable. Without them, it doesn't matter what the police have, there will be abuses, taser or not.

The other important thing is that the police report that the suspect had a knife. If that is true and they had no tasers, they would have shot him. They're trained not to directly confront someone with a knife, and in that situation, disabling the person by any means necessary is a priority.


RosaL
Offline
Joined: Mar 4 2007
quote:Originally posted by N.Beltov:
[
There's a huge parking area behind and to the west of the Health Sciences Centre in Winnipeg, that goes all the way to the Health Canada Microbiology Lab. That's what's relevant about the location, I think, if the police claims of car robbery/theft are to be believed.

Thanks. I figured you'd know [img]smile.gif" border="0[/img]


RosaL
Offline
Joined: Mar 4 2007
quote:Originally posted by unionist:

Don't know where your information comes from.

The Winnipeg "man" was a 17-year-old Metis kid.

Sorry. I hadn't read that. I'm not in the least surprised this wasn't mentioned (at least in the news reports I saw).

ETA: Looking back, I think my post could be misinterpreted. I wasn't suggesting he deserved it. Even if he was over 18. Or trying to break into some kind of government lab. (Beltov has disabused me of that one but I would have been sympathetic had it been true.)

[ 23 July 2008: Message edited by: RosaL ]


M. Spector
Offline
Joined: Feb 19 2005
quote:Originally posted by Aristotleded24:
...the police report that the suspect had a knife. If that is true and they had no tasers, they would have shot him. They're trained not to directly confront someone with a knife, and in that situation, disabling the person by any means necessary is a priority.
Actually, the media reports say the suspect was "brandishing" a knife. But unless he was within stabbing distance and actually tried to stab someone with it, there was no "priority" need to disable him.

The police are bleating about how they have to make a "split-second decision" on whether to use the taser. That's bullshit, designed to excuse poor judgment. All they did was tell him to drop the knife a couple of times and then they shot him.

If as you say they are trained not to directly confront the suspect, their training failed. Nothing could be more directly confrontational than shooting with a stun gun.

I predict the investigation will reveal that there was in fact no urgent necessity to disarm the youth immediately. Other less drastic tactics were available, but the cops are lazy. They'd rather shoot first.


Frustrated Mess
Offline
Joined: Feb 23 2005
quote: the cops are lazy. They'd rather shoot first.

Cops are trained to always take control of a situation and to resort quickly to violence to effect that control. If you don't believe me, just question a cop's order or demand, no matter how frivolous (such as sit over there), to see what I mean.

Cops lack the training, judgment, and good sense to sometime not immediately take control or to allow their authority to be harmlessly challenged in order to ensure everyone gets to go home when its all over.


Aristotleded24
Offline
Joined: May 24 2005
quote:Originally posted by M. Spector:
Actually, the media reports say the suspect was "brandishing" a knife. But unless he was within stabbing distance and actually tried to stab someone with it, there was no "priority" need to disable him.

Did you not catch my qualification?

Anyways, if you have an issue with that, you have to take it up with the people who train the police.

quote:Originally posted by M. Spector:
If as you say they are trained not to directly confront the suspect, their training failed. Nothing could be more directly confrontational than shooting with a stun gun.

I meant direct hand-to-hand confrontation. Directly approaching someone with a knife is dangerous, and not something I'd want to do, training or not.


jester
Offline
Joined: Jan 18 2006
quote: Cops lack the training, judgment, and good sense to sometime not immediately take control or to allow their authority to be harmlessly challenged in order to ensure everyone gets to go home when its all over.

Bullshit. Cops do not lack the good sense to ensure that they themselves get to go home when its all over. They are trained not to get hurt - regardless of who else does.

If you doubt this, pull a knife and wave it around,refusing to drop it when ordered by cops.


Frustrated Mess
Offline
Joined: Feb 23 2005
quote: Cops do not lack the good sense to ensure that they themselves get to go home when its all over.

So you say they are entirely selfish. That sorta diminishes their whole hero fetish thing, but okay. It doesn't at all contradict my point, however.

quote: If you doubt this, pull a knife and wave it around,refusing to drop it when ordered by cops.

Doing so while un-white will probably cost you your life. I mean, between going home unhurt and wanting that coffee and doughnut, who has time for someone waving a knife or even a tired, lost Polish fella?

jester
Offline
Joined: Jan 18 2006
There is a serious disconnect between the laws of Canada regarding use of force for the citizen and the perversion of those same laws by police intransigence to allow police to kill with impunity.

Most of the victims of police killings suffer from mental illness,not criminal sociopathy.

In Vancouver, a man waves a crowbar from a measurable distance at police and is shot dead. It is discovered that he is mentally ill but not on his medication. The cops walk.

In that same scenario,try telling the judge that you shot this man dead because he was in your yard and you felt threatened. You'll get life.


Frustrated Mess
Offline
Joined: Feb 23 2005
Unless you sit on the police services board. Was his name Norm Gardner?

Bacchus
Offline
Joined: Dec 8 2003
quote:Originally posted by Frustrated Mess:
Unless you sit on the police services board. Was his name Norm Gardner?


Well to be fair, he didnt kill the guy, just shot him in the ass.

But he shouldnt have been able to get a concealed carry permit, no way no how.


Frustrated Mess
Offline
Joined: Feb 23 2005
And despite having a gun permit he shouldn't have had, a gun that was a gift from the police he was supposed to be overseeing, and putting a bullet in the guy's ass, he was acquitted, right?

Robespierre
Offline
Joined: Jul 7 2008
If you are about to be raped, assaulted, robbed at knife point, or your home burlarized or vandalized, you will be glad if the cops intervene before any of those deeds are done. If you are already a crime victim you will be hopeful the perpetrator is caught by the cops. This is why we need cops in society.

We don't need cops to spy on political activists, detain, injure or kill innocent persons for any reason, nor anything else wrong or "politically motivated" or racist, or sexist, that we know cops are capable of doing, especially at the behest of some civilian politician who represents the interests of the ruling class.

I am guessing that tasers have not killed as many persons as guns have, and that if tasers were not available to cops they would use their guns more, and kill more often.

I was tazed once in a bar parking lot. The cop who did it was aiming at a big fellow next to me who was drunk, out of control and violent; he moved just as the cop fired the probes and---ZAP!!---I was on the ground. When I looked up the big dude was punching another cop. Haha! It was a wild night, I'm telling you.

Anyway, that tasing hurt like hell. But, I always wondered what could have happened if that cop only had a gun: would I have been shot dead that night?

I am reluctant to take a blanket position against tasers. Worker control of the police force is not a question for me, however. I'm just not sure that taking way their tasers will help that cause, and I'm inclined to think that more persons could be shot with guns if tasers were not available to cops.


M. Spector
Offline
Joined: Feb 19 2005
Then we'll take away their fucking guns.

N.Beltov
Offline
Joined: May 25 2003
Those who are making the argument that "better the police use tasers than handguns" are getting bushwhacked by another greasy trick. One of the legs of the stool used to justify the introduction of taser use in Canada, as in other jurisdictions, was that its use was as a non-lethal alternative to police use of their guns. We see a growing mountain of evidence that this is simply a steaming pile of police, and Taser International, shit. It's not a non-lethal alternative at all. In fact, it may never have been introduced at all if the propaganda as a non-lethal alternative was shown to be such a revolting pile of animal droppings.

We heard about "more tools in the police toolkit"; we heard about "a non-lethal alternative"; and we've heard and seen a carnival barker's show, with tales of a fictitious medical condition called "excited delirium", about how no deaths following Taser use have anything to do with this lethal product.

Time to knock another leg off the stool. Pardon the pun. Nova Scotia has seen the light and established a moratorium on the use of Tasers. It's time for other jurisdictions to do the same.

[ 23 July 2008: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]


Aristotleded24
Offline
Joined: May 24 2005
quote:Originally posted by jester:
Bullshit. Cops do not lack the good sense to ensure that they themselves get to go home when its all over. They are trained not to get hurt - regardless of who else does.

Yeah, that was my point exactly. I will also point out that in this case we don't have the facts yet. It could very well turn out that this individual was carrying a knife and that the cops had no other alternatives. It could very well be that the WPS is lying through its teeth on this instance.

We can speculate about how to handle a person with a knife, but cops know very well that a knife-wielding suspect who has just been shot or zapped won't try to stab them. Sounds cruel, but that's the reality. I certainly don't plan on brandishing knives around police officers any time soon.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or register to post comments